How many thousands more auto jobs moving to Mexico and China?

[danielpalos]

only the Right Wing, nevers gets the moral aspect.

you cant answer a question can you?....why dont you just make up a story like you usually do?....like the one about ellis island,that was hilarious....

Europeans found it. How difficult can it be.

but yet you could not....

nice story, bro.

what story is that?.....or is this just more danny talk?.........

you have nothing but fallacy; why should anybody take You seriously.

 

[hadit]

Why do you want to apply wartime policies to peaceful times? If it wasn't for capitalism, the US wouldn't have all the wealth the socialists are desperate to take.

LOL. If it weren't for right wing fantasy of special pleading, the right wing would have no arguments at all.

Let's abolish our alleged and fake wars on crime, drugs, and terror because there is no applying wartime policies to peaceful times.

Translation: You want to sit in Mom's basement all day smoking pot, and get paid for it.

sure; it beats financing fake wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror.

Only in loonyville. In the real world, you don't get paid simply for existing.

You are the looney. Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Why forget that? Nothing but fallacy, like usual.

Temporary unemployment. Chronic, or refusing to even look for work is not unemployment. I've taught you this before, but you didn't learn.

 

[Harry Dresden]

you cant answer a question can you?....why dont you just make up a story like you usually do?....like the one about ellis island,that was hilarious....

Europeans found it. How difficult can it be.

but yet you could not....

nice story, bro.

what story is that?.....or is this just more danny talk?.........

you have nothing but fallacy; why should anybody take You seriously.

but yet you cant give any examples....more danny talk?...and danny,going buy the responses you get to your nonsense,i dont think many take you seriously....just sayin...

 

[danielpalos]

LOL. If it weren't for right wing fantasy of special pleading, the right wing would have no arguments at all.

Let's abolish our alleged and fake wars on crime, drugs, and terror because there is no applying wartime policies to peaceful times.

Translation: You want to sit in Mom's basement all day smoking pot, and get paid for it.

sure; it beats financing fake wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror.

Only in loonyville. In the real world, you don't get paid simply for existing.

You are the looney. Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Why forget that? Nothing but fallacy, like usual.

Temporary unemployment. Chronic, or refusing to even look for work is not unemployment. I've taught you this before, but you didn't learn.

I thought a minimum wage was only temporary and not a way of life according to right wing propaganda? forgot it already for your special pleading.

 

[danielpalos]

Europeans found it. How difficult can it be.

but yet you could not....

nice story, bro.

what story is that?.....or is this just more danny talk?.........

you have nothing but fallacy; why should anybody take You seriously.

but yet you cant give any examples....more danny talk?...and danny,going buy the responses you get to your nonsense,i dont think many take you seriously....just sayin...

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

 

[Harry Dresden]

but yet you could not....

nice story, bro.

what story is that?.....or is this just more danny talk?.........

you have nothing but fallacy; why should anybody take You seriously.

but yet you cant give any examples....more danny talk?...and danny,going buy the responses you get to your nonsense,i dont think many take you seriously....just sayin...

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

 

[danielpalos]

nice story, bro.

what story is that?.....or is this just more danny talk?.........

you have nothing but fallacy; why should anybody take You seriously.

but yet you cant give any examples....more danny talk?...and danny,going buy the responses you get to your nonsense,i dont think many take you seriously....just sayin...

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

 

[hadit]

Translation: You want to sit in Mom's basement all day smoking pot, and get paid for it.

sure; it beats financing fake wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror.

Only in loonyville. In the real world, you don't get paid simply for existing.

You are the looney. Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Why forget that? Nothing but fallacy, like usual.

Temporary unemployment. Chronic, or refusing to even look for work is not unemployment. I've taught you this before, but you didn't learn.

I thought a minimum wage was only temporary and not a way of life according to right wing propaganda? forgot it already for your special pleading.

What does that have to do with your continued insistence that you should be paid to stay in Mom's basement smoking pot?

 

[hadit]

what story is that?.....or is this just more danny talk?.........

you have nothing but fallacy; why should anybody take You seriously.

but yet you cant give any examples....more danny talk?...and danny,going buy the responses you get to your nonsense,i dont think many take you seriously....just sayin...

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

Because you don't know the meanings of the words you spout.

 

[danielpalos]

sure; it beats financing fake wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror.

Only in loonyville. In the real world, you don't get paid simply for existing.

You are the looney. Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Why forget that? Nothing but fallacy, like usual.

Temporary unemployment. Chronic, or refusing to even look for work is not unemployment. I've taught you this before, but you didn't learn.

I thought a minimum wage was only temporary and not a way of life according to right wing propaganda? forgot it already for your special pleading.

What does that have to do with your continued insistence that you should be paid to stay in Mom's basement smoking pot?

envy the Poor instead of the Richest?

 

[danielpalos]

you have nothing but fallacy; why should anybody take You seriously.

but yet you cant give any examples....more danny talk?...and danny,going buy the responses you get to your nonsense,i dont think many take you seriously....just sayin...

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

Because you don't know the meanings of the words you spout.

I know them better than you.

 

[hadit]

but yet you cant give any examples....more danny talk?...and danny,going buy the responses you get to your nonsense,i dont think many take you seriously....just sayin...

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

Because you don't know the meanings of the words you spout.

I know them better than you.

Only in your own mind. For example, unemployment compensation is for those who, through no fault of their own, are released from their job and are looking for another. You try to spin that into getting paid even though you never held a job or just quit because you didn't want to work any more. The words simply don't mean that, multiple people have explained to you that they don't, yet you continue popping up in here claiming they do. That tells me that you have no intention of acknowledging that your interpretation is just plain wrong.

No one takes you seriously because of that.

Now, as for immigration, we have a problem because so many that we have no knowledge of are entering this country and staying. In this day of heightened terrorism alertness, we need to know who is coming here and what are their intentions. Your yammering about an immigration clause is meaningless, yet you keep popping up, starting it all over again.

 

[danielpalos]

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

Because you don't know the meanings of the words you spout.

I know them better than you.

Only in your own mind. For example, unemployment compensation is for those who, through no fault of their own, are released from their job and are looking for another. You try to spin that into getting paid even though you never held a job or just quit because you didn't want to work any more. The words simply don't mean that, multiple people have explained to you that they don't, yet you continue popping up in here claiming they do. That tells me that you have no intention of acknowledging that your interpretation is just plain wrong.

No one takes you seriously because of that.

Now, as for immigration, we have a problem because so many that we have no knowledge of are entering this country and staying. In this day of heightened terrorism alertness, we need to know who is coming here and what are their intentions. Your yammering about an immigration clause is meaningless, yet you keep popping up, starting it all over again.

Proof the right wing clueless and Causeless?

We have a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the legal concept of employment at the will of either party.

Why do the more fortunate make it more difficult for the less fortunate?

 

[Harry Dresden]

what story is that?.....or is this just more danny talk?.........

you have nothing but fallacy; why should anybody take You seriously.

but yet you cant give any examples....more danny talk?...and danny,going buy the responses you get to your nonsense,i dont think many take you seriously....just sayin...

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

ask those dumbasses in congress you vote for year after year....

 

[danielpalos]

you have nothing but fallacy; why should anybody take You seriously.

but yet you cant give any examples....more danny talk?...and danny,going buy the responses you get to your nonsense,i dont think many take you seriously....just sayin...

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

ask those dumbasses in congress you vote for year after year....

the democrats don't have their own democrat doctrine like the republicans. they use the federal doctrine.

 

[Harry Dresden]

but yet you cant give any examples....more danny talk?...and danny,going buy the responses you get to your nonsense,i dont think many take you seriously....just sayin...

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

ask those dumbasses in congress you vote for year after year....

the democrats don't have their own democrat doctrine like the republicans. they use the federal doctrine.

and it seems to be working as well as the republican one.....meaning they give a shit about fixing it as much as the republicans do...

 

[hadit]

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

Because you don't know the meanings of the words you spout.

I know them better than you.

Only in your own mind. For example, unemployment compensation is for those who, through no fault of their own, are released from their job and are looking for another. You try to spin that into getting paid even though you never held a job or just quit because you didn't want to work any more. The words simply don't mean that, multiple people have explained to you that they don't, yet you continue popping up in here claiming they do. That tells me that you have no intention of acknowledging that your interpretation is just plain wrong.

No one takes you seriously because of that.

Now, as for immigration, we have a problem because so many that we have no knowledge of are entering this country and staying. In this day of heightened terrorism alertness, we need to know who is coming here and what are their intentions. Your yammering about an immigration clause is meaningless, yet you keep popping up, starting it all over again.

Proof the right wing clueless and Causeless?

We have a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the legal concept of employment at the will of either party.

Why do the more fortunate make it more difficult for the less fortunate?

How does that resolve your problem with using words incorrectly?

 

[hadit]

but yet you cant give any examples....more danny talk?...and danny,going buy the responses you get to your nonsense,i dont think many take you seriously....just sayin...

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

ask those dumbasses in congress you vote for year after year....

the democrats don't have their own democrat doctrine like the republicans. they use the federal doctrine.

And again, you use words incorrectly.

 

[danielpalos]

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

ask those dumbasses in congress you vote for year after year....

the democrats don't have their own democrat doctrine like the republicans. they use the federal doctrine.

and it seems to be working as well as the republican one.....meaning they give a shit about fixing it as much as the republicans do...

There is nothing wrong with the federal doctrine.

 

[danielpalos]

Why are we losing money on border policy? We don't have an immigration clause.

what border policy?....

We have no immigration clause; why do we have an illegal problem?

ask those dumbasses in congress you vote for year after year....

the democrats don't have their own democrat doctrine like the republicans. they use the federal doctrine.

And again, you use words incorrectly.

you use them more incorrectly.