Hubris – Peter Strzok Argues in Court His First Amendment Rights Were Violated…

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,877
The FBI official who led the team effort to violate the fourth amendment rights of U.S. person Carter Page via unlawful surveillance, is now claiming his first amendment rights to free speech were violated when the FBI fired him for gross misconduct.

WASHINGTON DC – Former FBI agent Peter Strzok, a onetime member of former special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe, is claiming the FBI and Justice Department violated his rights of free speech and privacy when firing him for uncovered texts that criticized President Trump. (link)

Our research indicates the lawsuits filed by Peter Strzok & Lisa Page have an undisclosed purpose. It appears both lawsuits are designed to block the DOJ from releasing the unredacted text conversations. The redactions are hiding evidence of FBI motive.

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...

Ah yes, the First Amendment right of the chosen few to overthrow the duly elected President of the United States and to plot that overthrow while being paid with taxpayer dollars to uphold the Constitution.....
 
Peter Strzok said out lout what everyone in Washington is thinking.

Trump is a fucking idiot.
 
Peter Strzok said out lout what everyone in Washington is thinking.

Trump is a fucking idiot.
Put 5 cents in the jar, plz. Thx.
man-paying-swear-jar-bar-soap-his-mouth-39141313.jpg
 
Strzok, treasonous bastard that he is, deserves to be charged with treason for his part in the coup. Anything less is just a slap on the wrist.
 
Strzok, treasonous bastard that he is, deserves to be charged with treason for his part in the coup. Anything less is just a slap on the wrist.
He seems to be playing the "The best defense is a good offense" game.

If the lower courts try and let him off the hook, the Supremes won't. His calumny and threats to take out a President of the United States amounted to flattery for the Democrats but treason against the people of the United States of America. When you work for the government and you use government space in order to take out a specific person from public office using your mistress to conspire with you, you deserve to be fired with benefits removed from your work so the people do not have to fund your own hubris. Take out the mistress part, and you still have a loose cannon with a load of explosives. He should take his lumps and learn a lesson not to engage in corruption any more. IMHO.
 
Strzok, treasonous bastard that he is, deserves to be charged with treason for his part in the coup. Anything less is just a slap on the wrist.
He seems to be playing the "The best defense is a good offense" game.

If the lower courts try and let him off the hook, the Supremes won't. His calumny and threats to take out a President of the United States amounted to flattery for the Democrats but treason against the people of the United States of America. When you work for the government and you use government space in order to take out a specific person from public office using your mistress to conspire with you, you deserve to be fired with benefits removed from your work so the people do not have to fund your own hubris. Take out the mistress part, and you still have a loose cannon with a load of explosives. He should take his lumps and learn a lesson not to engage in corruption any more. IMHO.
Sorry but I don't want to pay that treasonous bastards benefits. Hang em.
 
The FBI official who led the team effort to violate the fourth amendment rights of U.S. person Carter Page via unlawful surveillance, is now claiming his first amendment rights to free speech were violated when the FBI fired him for gross misconduct.

WASHINGTON DC – Former FBI agent Peter Strzok, a onetime member of former special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe, is claiming the FBI and Justice Department violated his rights of free speech and privacy when firing him for uncovered texts that criticized President Trump. (link)

Our research indicates the lawsuits filed by Peter Strzok & Lisa Page have an undisclosed purpose. It appears both lawsuits are designed to block the DOJ from releasing the unredacted text conversations. The redactions are hiding evidence of FBI motive.

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...

Ah yes, the First Amendment right of the chosen few to overthrow the duly elected President of the United States and to plot that overthrow while being paid with taxpayer dollars to uphold the Constitution.....





More and more I am convinced he's a sociopath.
 

Forum List

Back
Top