HUGE: House Speaker McCarthy Handed Over 41,000 Hours of Jan 6 Video to Tucker Carlson

There is plenty of evidence but the courts seem afraid to rule on it. Our elections have become a joke and no better than in most 3rd world countries.
Yep just like the Republicans from Bush Jr. days. "They have WMD all over the place, to the north, and south, east and somewhat west of the city!"

Then after a few years it became, "They did find WMD in Iraq", "You progs just don't want to believe it!"
 
There is plenty of evidence but the courts seem afraid to rule on it. Our elections have become a joke and no better than in most 3rd world countries.
The evidence didn’t make it to court because there’s repercussions to making false claims in court.

People talked about this evidence on TV. They had entirely different stories when they got before a judge.

Ask the former Republican AG of Arizona, who was reluctant to tell you the truth.

 
It has everything to do with your claim that Trump’s allies were frozen out of media. I gave you three examples of his allies that have prime time shows on the most watched cable news network.
Besides the limited footage available, what material would have been used to objectively provide a defense? What do these Fox News hosts have available now that they didn't over the last 2 years?
 
Yep just like the Republicans from Bush Jr. days. "They have WMD all over the place, to the north, and south, east and somewhat west of the city!"

Then after a few years it became, "They did find WMD in Iraq", "You progs just don't want to believe it!"

Yeah uummm....I hate to break it to ya: But things have changed quite a bit with both parties since then.

The Democrats are now the party of the Deep State/Forever Wars; and they embrace Bush/Cheney as the "good Republicans".

You stood against Iraq and the WMD lies despite the fact that anyone questioning it was sullied as a "terrorist" and jeopardizing "National Security". I applaud that.

But wait? Today, which party says anyone who disagrees with them is a "RACIST!", and what reason do they give for not releasing more J6 footage to the public? Oh yeah...."NATIONAL SECURITY!"

Welcome to 2023.

Instead of pledging allegiance to a letter of the alphabet, a little objective consistency would take you a long way down the road toward truth..
 
Corruptly influencing his followers to the point that they engaged in violence to support him. He had a right to speak his mind, but there might be consequences.

The constitution says that Congress has the power to impeach. That’s what they did, rightfully so.

it's not rightly so if there was no impeachable offense. The Nazi mentality is they can impeach for whatever, whenever they want. That's not what the Constitution says. Nor does it say that any American is responsible for the actions of others by exercising their free speech rights. And exercising ones rights is not a crime yet alone a high crime.
 
Besides the limited footage available, what material would have been used to objectively provide a defense? What do these Fox News hosts have available now that they didn't over the last 2 years?
limited footage? The rioters did us a huge favor by taking excessive amounts of footage they uploaded to social media documenting their crimes. There was no defense. They tried blaming it on antifa but that fell apart quickly as there was no evidence to support it.

But remember, the committee wasn’t just about the riot, it was about Trump’s actions to change the result.
 
Aa
it's not rightly so if there was no impeachable offense. The Nazi mentality is they can impeach for whatever, whenever they want. That's not what the Constitution says. Nor does it say that any American is responsible for the actions of others by exercising their free speech rights. And exercising ones rights is not a crime yet alone a high crime.
The founders set up the constitution to say that Congress decided when to impeach. The founders were very worried about demagogues using their power to corruptly influence their faction.

This was a fine example of the use of impeachment. Trump demonstrated he is a threat to the republic which is a high crime.
 
Aa

The founders set up the constitution to say that Congress decided when to impeach. The founders were very worried about demagogues using their power to corruptly influence their faction.

This was a fine example of the use of impeachment. Trump demonstrated he is a threat to the republic which is a high crime.

There was no threat to the Republic. Anybody that thinks a bunch of clowns dressed up as fake wrestlers is a threat to the strongest military country in the world is either stupid or brainwashed. Trump trying to find ways to win the election is not a threat to the Republic.

There was no impeachable offense because there was no crimes committed.
 
Yeah uummm....I hate to break it to ya: But things have changed quite a bit with both parties since then.

The Democrats are now the party of the Deep State/Forever Wars; and they embrace Bush/Cheney as the "good Republicans".

You stood against Iraq and the WMD lies despite the fact that anyone questioning it was sullied as a "terrorist" and jeopardizing "National Security". I applaud that.

But wait? Today, which party says anyone who disagrees with them is a "RACIST!", and what reason do they give for not releasing more J6 footage to the public? Oh yeah...."NATIONAL SECURITY!"

Welcome to 2023.

Instead of pledging allegiance to a letter of the alphabet, a little objective consistency would take you a long way down the road toward truth..
The Democrats have always had plenty of warhawks. I disagree with Democrat policies all the time and I've only been called racist once by some fool.

Rambling on about how election fraud stole the election from the Trumpybear is like claiming Iraq was a threat because it had WMD.
 

Forum List

Back
Top