I predict Biden will criticize Israel for bombing the AP building in Gaza.

Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
As you can see below, there was something called the British mandate of Palestine. It wasn't a country, and it was compromised of both the area that was to become Palestine (Jordan) and the area reserved for a Jewish homeland.

iu
 
The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
Don't forget the Balfour Declaration which created a path for a Jewish state in 1917.
Truman had nothing to do with it. Are you a liar or stupid?

That's rhetorical by the way. I know what you are.
 
Last edited:

When a party stands with an internationally recognized terrorist group instead of our allies then there is something wrong. Democrats have lost their minds.
 
As you can see below, there was something called the British mandate of Palestine. It wasn't a country, and it was compromised of both the area that was to become Palestine (Jordan) and the area reserved for a Jewish homeland.
Jews and stateless unwanted Arabs were given land for their own nations.
The Jews took it and built a democracy that flourished in the desert.

The Palestinian Arabs refused to live next to Jews and decided they would rather tear down Israel than
build up Palestine. They used their own children as human terrorist bombs.

Now they shelter Hamas while they attempt mass murder of innocent Israeli civilians.
 
Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
There's no such country as Palestine, and the people who claim they are Palestinian are almost entirely from somewhere else.

That makes no sense.
Palestine, (AKA the Land of Canaan, the Levant, etc.,) is always described as the most popular and densely populated in the entire Mideast.
The Oranges of Jaffa were world famous in the 1800s.
In 1922 the census says 3/4 of a million Palestinians, with only 4% being Jewish.
(It actually would have been higher total, but WWI and disease brought it down.)
So then how could 3/4 of a million Palestinian, mostly Moslem, not be a Palestine in 1922?
Especially since Palestine had just been legally mandated by treaty in 1920?
 
Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
There's no such country as Palestine, and the people who claim they are Palestinian are almost entirely from somewhere else.
Does Israel have the right to exist?
Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
There's no such country as Palestine, and the people who claim they are Palestinian are almost entirely from somewhere else.

That makes no sense.
Palestine, (AKA the Land of Canaan, the Levant, etc.,) is always described as the most popular and densely populated in the entire Mideast.
The Oranges of Jaffa were world famous in the 1800s.
In 1922 the census says 3/4 of a million Palestinians, with only 4% being Jewish.
(It actually would have been higher total, but WWI and disease brought it down.)
So then how could 3/4 of a million Palestinian, mostly Moslem, not be a Palestine in 1922?
Especially since Palestine had just been legally mandated by treaty in 1920?
Does Israel have the right to exist and when was the nation of Palestine established?
 

When a party stands with an internationally recognized terrorist group instead of our allies then there is something wrong. Democrats have lost their minds.

Israel has never been our ally, and has never shared interests, bases, or anything else.
Instead, Israel has illegally spied on us, shot and killed US sailors, colluded illegally in US elections, and made enemies for us all over the world.
 

When a party stands with an internationally recognized terrorist group instead of our allies then there is something wrong. Democrats have lost their minds.

Israel has never been our ally, and has never shared interests, bases, or anything else.
Instead, Israel has illegally spied on us, shot and killed US sailors, colluded illegally in US elections, and made enemies for us all over the world.
Does Israel have the right to exist?
 
Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
There's no such country as Palestine, and the people who claim they are Palestinian are almost entirely from somewhere else.

That makes no sense.
Palestine, (AKA the Land of Canaan, the Levant, etc.,) is always described as the most popular and densely populated in the entire Mideast.
The Oranges of Jaffa were world famous in the 1800s.
In 1922 the census says 3/4 of a million Palestinians, with only 4% being Jewish.
(It actually would have been higher total, but WWI and disease brought it down.)
So then how could 3/4 of a million Palestinian, mostly Moslem, not be a Palestine in 1922?
Especially since Palestine had just been legally mandated by treaty in 1920?
Canaan is one thing, and Palestine was another. The later was a creation of the United Nations. It wasn't a country.

You wouldn't ask questions like you did if you had simply read the facts. There has never been a country called Palestine. The territory the UN put Britain in charge of was divided up into Israel and Jordan. The so-called "Palestinians" are actually Jordanians.
 

When a party stands with an internationally recognized terrorist group instead of our allies then there is something wrong. Democrats have lost their minds.

Israel has never been our ally, and has never shared interests, bases, or anything else.
Instead, Israel has illegally spied on us, shot and killed US sailors, colluded illegally in US elections, and made enemies for us all over the world.
Obama interefered in Israel's elections, if you don't recall. The CIA also spies on Israel.
 
As you can see below, there was something called the British mandate of Palestine. It wasn't a country, and it was compromised of both the area that was to become Palestine (Jordan) and the area reserved for a Jewish homeland.
Jews and stateless unwanted Arabs were given land for their own nations.
The Jews took it and built a democracy that flourished in the desert.

The Palestinian Arabs refused to live next to Jews and decided they would rather tear down Israel than
build up Palestine. They used their own children as human terrorist bombs.

Now they shelter Hamas while they attempt mass murder of innocent Israeli civilians.

Lies.

The Palestinians correctly rejected the 1948 UN partition because it gave 55% of the land to the Jews who were only 30% of the population.

Anyone claiming child bombers is lying.

Anyone claiming the 1948 war was not caused by the Zionists massacring Arab villages like Dier Yassin, is a liar.

Hamas has only retaliated against illegal Israeli aggression.
 
AP/AJ are huge Hamas/Iran supporters.
A child knows this fact.
These fuckers have been having lunch in the building every fucking day with Hamas leaders.
Israel showed Biden 100% proof that Hamas had been operating out of the building with the full knowledge of AP/AJ.

And why shouldn't the press be supporters of Hamas, the democratically elected representatives of Palestine?
The government of Palestine, operates out of almost all the commercial buildings in Gaza.
They run all the schools, utilities, libraries, etc.
Why did Abbas cancel the 'election' asshole?
B/c he KNEW he wouldn't get reelected.
That's why Iran told him to start firing off thousands of Iran supplied rockets into Israel. To distract from the FACT that the average Palestinian has fucking had it with living in a violent shithole sand dune. The Palestinian youth have the fucking internet and they fucking KNOW they are being controlled by a bunch of toothless stinking psychopaths who would rather buy bullets than buy food for their granddaughters AKA their future sex slaves.

Wrong.
The election was cancelled because Israel would not allow voting stations in any of the contested areas, which is the entire West Bank.
All the problems in Palestine are caused deliberately by Israel.
Link from a non-Arab site?

{...
Unable to vote, Palestinians shrug off Israel's elections

MAS’HA, West Bank (AP) — Barhoum Saleh’s town is surrounded by Jewish settlements, the sign above his roadside mechanic shop is in Hebrew, most of his customers are Israeli and he needs an Israeli permit to visit the beach a half hour’s drive away.

But unlike his Jewish neighbors, he can’t vote in next week’s elections.

Saleh is among the 2.5 million Palestinians in the West Bank who have no voice in choosing Israel’s next government and no control over whether it decides to annex part or all of the occupied territory, as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to do . With the peace process having sputtered to a halt a decade ago, they also have little hope of getting a state of their own anytime soon.
...}
He's not a citizen of Israel, so why should he be allowed to vote in their elections?

He is on land controlled by the government of Israel.
Israel either has to retreat back to the 1948 partition, or allow all the Arabs in the occupied lands to vote in Israeli elections.

Not true. Palestinians are a gang of criminals. They are not entitled to anything you claim.

Nonsense.
Palestinians did their part to help the Allies in WWI, and it is the Allies that criminally failed to liberate Palestine as required by treaty.
The Zionists of Israel are all illegal immigrants with illegal US weapons they used to murder Palestinians and steal land.
Does Israel have the right to exist?
Don't go there with Rigby!
Hamas is Sunni and Iran is Shiite.
Saudi Arabia is a more likely source of Hamas funding, since they are both Sunni.
Thats an over simplification

Iran is Israels sworn enemy

They would gladly fund hamas

Wrong.
In fact, Iran has never cared about Israel to ever get involved in a single conflict over Palestine.
Iran just says Israel will collapse on its own since it is minority rule.
You're right; Iran was simply busy attacking Iraq.

The war between Iran and Iraq ended in 1988.
The war ended but ISIS didn't get the message until Trump MOABed them.
 
As you can see below, there was something called the British mandate of Palestine. It wasn't a country, and it was compromised of both the area that was to become Palestine (Jordan) and the area reserved for a Jewish homeland.
Jews and stateless unwanted Arabs were given land for their own nations.
The Jews took it and built a democracy that flourished in the desert.

The Palestinian Arabs refused to live next to Jews and decided they would rather tear down Israel than
build up Palestine. They used their own children as human terrorist bombs.

Now they shelter Hamas while they attempt mass murder of innocent Israeli civilians.

Lies.

The Palestinians correctly rejected the 1948 UN partition because it gave 55% of the land to the Jews who were only 30% of the population.

Anyone claiming child bombers is lying.

Anyone claiming the 1948 war was not caused by the Zionists massacring Arab villages like Dier Yassin, is a liar.

Hamas has only retaliated against illegal Israeli aggression.
Too many Links!
I can't keep up!
 
Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
There's no such country as Palestine, and the people who claim they are Palestinian are almost entirely from somewhere else.
Does Israel have the right to exist?
Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
There's no such country as Palestine, and the people who claim they are Palestinian are almost entirely from somewhere else.

That makes no sense.
Palestine, (AKA the Land of Canaan, the Levant, etc.,) is always described as the most popular and densely populated in the entire Mideast.
The Oranges of Jaffa were world famous in the 1800s.
In 1922 the census says 3/4 of a million Palestinians, with only 4% being Jewish.
(It actually would have been higher total, but WWI and disease brought it down.)
So then how could 3/4 of a million Palestinian, mostly Moslem, not be a Palestine in 1922?
Especially since Palestine had just been legally mandated by treaty in 1920?
Does Israel have the right to exist and when was the nation of Palestine established?

Technically Israel has no right to exist at all, being illegal immigrants, guilty of war crimes in 1948.
The only problem is so many new generations have been born since the 1948 crimes by Zionists, that it is now not quite so clear cut?

Palestine was legally established by treaty in 1920.
The Treaty of San Remo and the Treaty of Sevres.
The Allies were contractually obligated to liberate Palestine after they helped the Allies in WWI.
 
Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
There's no such country as Palestine, and the people who claim they are Palestinian are almost entirely from somewhere else.
Does Israel have the right to exist?
Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
There's no such country as Palestine, and the people who claim they are Palestinian are almost entirely from somewhere else.

That makes no sense.
Palestine, (AKA the Land of Canaan, the Levant, etc.,) is always described as the most popular and densely populated in the entire Mideast.
The Oranges of Jaffa were world famous in the 1800s.
In 1922 the census says 3/4 of a million Palestinians, with only 4% being Jewish.
(It actually would have been higher total, but WWI and disease brought it down.)
So then how could 3/4 of a million Palestinian, mostly Moslem, not be a Palestine in 1922?
Especially since Palestine had just been legally mandated by treaty in 1920?
Does Israel have the right to exist and when was the nation of Palestine established?

Technically Israel has no right to exist at all, being illegal immigrants, guilty of war crimes in 1948.
The only problem is so many new generations have been born since the 1948 crimes by Zionists, that it is now not quite so clear cut?

Palestine was legally established by treaty in 1920.
The Treaty of San Remo and the Treaty of Sevres.
The Allies were contractually obligated to liberate Palestine after they helped the Allies in WWI.
Do you realize what a gigantic ass you just made of yourself?
 
Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
There's no such country as Palestine, and the people who claim they are Palestinian are almost entirely from somewhere else.
Does Israel have the right to exist?
Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
There's no such country as Palestine, and the people who claim they are Palestinian are almost entirely from somewhere else.

That makes no sense.
Palestine, (AKA the Land of Canaan, the Levant, etc.,) is always described as the most popular and densely populated in the entire Mideast.
The Oranges of Jaffa were world famous in the 1800s.
In 1922 the census says 3/4 of a million Palestinians, with only 4% being Jewish.
(It actually would have been higher total, but WWI and disease brought it down.)
So then how could 3/4 of a million Palestinian, mostly Moslem, not be a Palestine in 1922?
Especially since Palestine had just been legally mandated by treaty in 1920?
Does Israel have the right to exist and when was the nation of Palestine established?

Technically Israel has no right to exist at all, being illegal immigrants, guilty of war crimes in 1948.
The only problem is so many new generations have been born since the 1948 crimes by Zionists, that it is now not quite so clear cut?

Palestine was legally established by treaty in 1920.
The Treaty of San Remo and the Treaty of Sevres.
The Allies were contractually obligated to liberate Palestine after they helped the Allies in WWI.
Was Palestine established a sovereign nation like Israel was?
 
As you can see below, there was something called the British mandate of Palestine. It wasn't a country, and it was compromised of both the area that was to become Palestine (Jordan) and the area reserved for a Jewish homeland.
Jews and stateless unwanted Arabs were given land for their own nations.
The Jews took it and built a democracy that flourished in the desert.

The Palestinian Arabs refused to live next to Jews and decided they would rather tear down Israel than
build up Palestine. They used their own children as human terrorist bombs.

Now they shelter Hamas while they attempt mass murder of innocent Israeli civilians.

Lies.

The Palestinians correctly rejected the 1948 UN partition because it gave 55% of the land to the Jews who were only 30% of the population.

Anyone claiming child bombers is lying.

Anyone claiming the 1948 war was not caused by the Zionists massacring Arab villages like Dier Yassin, is a liar.

Hamas has only retaliated against illegal Israeli aggression.
What you posted is a lie. Most of the land was given to the Arabs. They got 77% of the land, and Israel got 23%. The attempt to portray the so-called Palestinians as victims couldn't be more absurd.

iu
 
Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.
Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?
So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?
We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?
Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.
Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.
Where are you FACTS supporting your personal opinion such as "there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...

Question for you:
Would you consider a country that committed the following as more criminally than Israel?

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million.
Or how about this country:
From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now why should ANY ONE believe anything you write because right with this stupidly ignorant statement you show that anything you write is totally biased. Totally ignorant. AND truly unsubstantiated.
Compared to 100 million killed by Stalin/Mao i.e Communists which evidently (YOU ARE)... where do you get off on saying ""there has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel"...
Don't you see that anyone who reads that and knows history will say that guy is crazy!
This asshole believes "Palestine" is a real country but Israel isn't.

The natives are Palestinian, while the Zionists are all illegal immigrants, mostly from Poland and Russia.
Palestine was made in 1920 by world treaty and legal obligation.
Israel was created essentially by Truman's unilateral fiat in 1949.
There's no such country as Palestine, and the people who claim they are Palestinian are almost entirely from somewhere else.

That makes no sense.
Palestine, (AKA the Land of Canaan, the Levant, etc.,) is always described as the most popular and densely populated in the entire Mideast.
The Oranges of Jaffa were world famous in the 1800s.
In 1922 the census says 3/4 of a million Palestinians, with only 4% being Jewish.
(It actually would have been higher total, but WWI and disease brought it down.)
So then how could 3/4 of a million Palestinian, mostly Moslem, not be a Palestine in 1922?
Especially since Palestine had just been legally mandated by treaty in 1920?
Canaan is one thing, and Palestine was another. The later was a creation of the United Nations. It wasn't a country.

You wouldn't ask questions like you did if you had simply read the facts. There has never been a country called Palestine. The territory the UN put Britain in charge of was divided up into Israel and Jordan. The so-called "Palestinians" are actually Jordanians.

Wrong.
Palestine was created by the League of Nations, the Treaty of San Remo, the Treaty of Sevres, and the Allies from WWI, in 1920.
That was before the UN was created in 1945.
The UN had nothing to do with creating Palestine in 1920.

The British were mandated only to create an Arab Palestine, and there is no legal basis for Israel.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.
{...
Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}
 

Forum List

Back
Top