Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, in Canada, the national anthem references God, so what is your point? There is no law, nor has there ever been any interpretation of the Canadian constitution which proclaims a separation between church and state, as there is in America. You can put up the 10 Commandments in a Canadian court house if you want.
Thus, by this standard, America is more "communist" than Canada.
But can't you see how stupid this line of reasoning is? What you are saying is that a place is becoming communist because someone's religious practices are being restricted. Religious practices are being restricted all the time in all countries. There is no absolute right to practice religion in any way one sees fit in America. And this does not make America "communist."
I have no use for the Human Rights Commissions in Canada, but to say that their rulings are evidence of "communism" merely reflects one's ignorance and lack of understanding of what communism is about.
Hog wash. The Canadian system is ordering a main stream Christian religious figure to cease practicing his religion. That is ignorant and tyranical. A sight different then some court ordering some murderous vampire worshipper from not slaughtering people for his "religion"
Go ahead keep justifying the actions of Canada, it just shows how ignorant you are on the subject.
Hog wash. The Canadian system is ordering a main stream Christian religious figure to cease practicing his religion. That is ignorant and tyranical. A sight different then some court ordering some murderous vampire worshipper from not slaughtering people for his "religion"
Go ahead keep justifying the actions of Canada, it just shows how ignorant you are on the subject.
As Toro pointed out, an economic system doesn't care about free speech or freedom of religion, it's an economic system. The folks who run the country make the decisions about human rights. It doesn't follow that communism=totalitarianism.
Bullshit, all of it, utter and total hyperbole and inaccurate to boot.
No-one has been ordered to stop practising their religion. Absolute bullshit and a complete misrepresentation. The facts are there but you continue to make assertions to the contrary. You need to get a job with Fox
"Mr. Boissoin and The Concerned Christian Coalition Inc. shall cease publishing in newspapers, by e-mail, on the radio, in public speeches, or on the Internet, in future, disparaging remarks about gays and homosexuals. Further, they shall not and are prohibited from making disparaging remarks in the future about … Lund or … Lund's witnesses relating to their involvement in this complaint. Further, all disparaging remarks versus homosexuals are directed to be removed from current Web sites and publications of Mr. Boissoin and The Concerned Christian Coalition Inc.," the lawyer opined.
Nowhere is that ordering someone to cease practising their religion, unless his religious practice involves spreading hatred.
When he is told he can't hold a service or preach to his congregation then I'll be happy to be up in arms. He hasn't been. He has been told to cut the hate speech. It would be the same for a Muslim Imam who tried this crap and was told cut the hate speech. By all means keep worshipping but cut the hate speech.
There, that wasn't so bad was it?
A court reverses a parent's grounding of his 12 year-old daughter.
globeandmail.com: Father doesn't know best, court rules in girl's fight to get grounding overruled
I think this is fundamentally just an argument between a teenager against over protective parents. Parents need to learn to "chill out" more often. The father in this case was being unreasonable and the daughter decided that she felt strongly enough that she was going to take him to court over it.
If something happened to that girl you wouldnt being saying that. Then you would be screaming at the top of your lungs that the father didnt do enough and that he should be hung by his toenails.
Cant have it both ways toots!
She posted photos of herself on a dating website...? What was going to happen to her beyond the chance of meeting some guy who might not call her again after the first date?
Seriously.
People are way too paranoid about rapists/etc on the internet when it comes to their teenagers. The Paul Bernardos of the world don't pick up girls online because they know there will be an electronic record of their conversation that the police can trace back to them.
And its not like she wasn't going to be cautious anyway. Meet in a public place, tell her friends who she was meeting, where and when, and then maybe to go a dinner and a movie.
Statistically a young woman is more likely to be raped at a friend's party while everyone is passed out on the floor from drinking too much (because then the rapist can claim they were both drunk and that she was willing). That or date rape by some guy on the football team.
The girl in question probably has a tonne of photos on Facebook or some other website anyway. Who doesn't these days? Parents haven't caught up with the technology and how society has changed.
Call it the classic struggle of the over-protective parent vs the teenager who wants to spread their wings.
The internet doesn't rape people, people rape people.
She posted photos of herself on a dating website...? What was going to happen to her beyond the chance of meeting some guy who might not call her again after the first date?
Seriously.
People are way too paranoid about rapists/etc on the internet when it comes to their teenagers. The Paul Bernardos of the world don't pick up girls online because they know there will be an electronic record of their conversation that the police can trace back to them.
And its not like she wasn't going to be cautious anyway. Meet in a public place, tell her friends who she was meeting, where and when, and then maybe to go a dinner and a movie.
Statistically a young woman is more likely to be raped at a friend's party while everyone is passed out on the floor from drinking too much (because then the rapist can claim they were both drunk and that she was willing). That or date rape by some guy on the football team.
The girl in question probably has a tonne of photos on Facebook or some other website anyway. Who doesn't these days? Parents haven't caught up with the technology and how society has changed.
Call it the classic struggle of the over-protective parent vs the teenager who wants to spread their wings.
The internet doesn't rape people, people rape people.
Obama wants to take away our rights as parents and indoctrinate our children with his Moslem terrorist-loving, gay-loving and anti-American black power philosophy. He should go run for King of Canada.
