Zone1 If DEI is the SOLE Reason for Every U.S. Disaster Since 1964 Then Logical Reasoning REQUIRES Not a Single Disastrous Incident Occurred PRIOR to 1964.

There have been fewer accidents.
yes not because of people but better technology, that is what I said

you know 1980 to now is 45 years, I would hope they would improve

still you put some DEI which have no clue what they are doing I don't give a shit if they are using Ai, they would probably
still fuck it up

right people, right tech.......things are safer like flying

both did 4 years in the air force ,not a 1 year crash course at some community college

together they saved about 7 planes from near air collisions
 
Last edited:
yes not because of people but better technology, that is what I said

you know 1980 to now is 45 years, I would hope they would improve

still you put some DEI which have no clue what they are doing I don't give a shit if they are using Ai, they would probably
still fuck it up

right people, right tech.......things are safer like flying
You don't even know what DEI is. You're a dumb MAGAT who fell for the DEI race hustle.

For example, a white Air Force veteran would be a DEI hire. White doesn't mean competence.
 
You don't even know what DEI is. You're a dumb MAGAT who fell for the DEI race hustle.

For example, a white Air Force veteran would be a DEI hire. White doesn't mean competence.
haha DEI means a person hired based on a certain basis NOT due to education

only you state that while does not mean competence and that is not the debate at all

deflection for $100 Alex....
 
haha DEI means a person hired based on a certain basis NOT due to education

only you state that while does not mean competence and that is not the debate at all

deflection for $100 Alex....
Wrong. So again, you don't know what DEI is.
 
Wrong. So again, you don't know what DEI is.
DEI stands for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, a framework used to promote fair treatment, representation, and participation of all individuals, particularly those from historically underrepresented or marginalized groups. DEI initiatives are commonly implemented in workplaces, educational institutions, and other organizations to foster inclusive environments and address systemic inequalities.

putting people into a job they don't belong BASED on aww they were too fucking stupid to do the job so we need to be fair is the nutshell of the matter

there is no need for a lesbian plumber who does not know what a pipe wrench is just because there are no lesbian plumber and you would not know regardless unless they look ultra butch.......haha

just one example

there are plenty of black and brown people in jobs but not because of their color but because they are educated and can prove they actually know what they are doing

you are clueless on what merit based means
 
DEI stands for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, a framework used to promote fair treatment, representation, and participation of all individuals, particularly those from historically underrepresented or marginalized groups. DEI initiatives are commonly implemented in workplaces, educational institutions, and other organizations to foster inclusive environments and address systemic inequalities.

putting people into a job they don't belong BASED on aww they were too fucking stupid to do the job so we need to be fair is the nutshell of the matter

there is no need for a lesbian plumber who does not know what a pipe wrench is just because there are no lesbian plumber and you would not know regardless unless they look ultra butch.......haha

just one example

there are plenty of black and brown people in jobs but not because of their color but because they are educated and can prove they actually know what they are doing

you are clueless on what merit based means
A white man talking about merit is like a blind man trying to teach somebody how to see.

A lesbian can't be a plumber without being trained and certified as a plumber. Again, you don't know what DEI is.
 
A white man talking about merit is like a blind man trying to teach somebody how to see.

A lesbian can't be a plumber without being trained and certified as a plumber. Again, you don't know what DEI is.
actually you don't seem to understand. you keep throwing race around and not merit

a lesbian can be a good plumber if trained, again you are going by sexual orientation

well is that not ironic against your argument

apparent you hate white straight males and see them all as incompetent when they kinda built the USA

funny you don't share location.....are you not from here?
 
The existence of major disasters long before DEI proves that human error, incompetence, and systemic failures have always been present, regardless of who was in charge.
Nice, wrong, not correct at all.

It always makes a difference who is in charge.

What is inexcusable is the excuses, obfuscations, redirection, and deflection attempting to somehow hide the fact that incompetent people were hired based on dei
 
Chump blamed dei for a disaster. He said it was common sense that was the cause. What happened, did you see a squirrel?
No he didn’t. He said it MAY have.

Are we supposed to pretend that prioritizing diversity over the most competent possible does not lower the competency level? Do we have to pretend that discriminating against whites has no downside?
 
Nice, wrong, not correct at all.

It always makes a difference who is in charge.

What is inexcusable is the excuses, obfuscations, redirection, and deflection attempting to somehow hide the fact that incompetent people were hired based on dei
They don’t want to admit that hiring based on DEI rather than the most competent has downsides. That’s because they want to keep being able to discriminate against whites.
 
A white man talking about merit is like a blind man trying to teach somebody how to see.

A lesbian can't be a plumber without being trained and certified as a plumber. Again, you don't know what DEI is.
She can if not enough lesbians are passing the certification test so they dumb it down until enough do.

That is what has happened with college admissions in order to increase the percentage of blacks. They lowered the grade and test score cut-off until enough blacks qualified.

Harvard invited blacks with SAT scores as low as 1100 to apply but required 1250 of whites and 1350 of Asians.
 
She can if not enough lesbians are passing the certification test so they dumb it down until enough do.

That is what has happened with college admissions in order to increase the percentage of blacks. They lowered the grade and test score cut-off until enough blacks qualified.

Harvard invited blacks with SAT scores as low as 1100 to apply but required 1250 of whites and 1350 of Asians.
Harvard has more Asians admitted than blacks, Hispanics and Native Americans combined. Whites were allowed into Harvard with lower scores than 1100 on legacy or ALDC'.

Admissions Statistics, A Brief Profile of the Admitted Class of 2028, Harvard welcomes students from across the country and all over, Admissions Statistics

Daniella Silva, Study on Harvard finds 43 percent of white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff, Study finds 43 percent of Harvard's white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff

Peter Arcidiacono, Josh Kinsler, Tyler Ransom, National Bureau Of Economic Research, Legacy And Athlete Preferences At Harvard, Working Paper 26316, Legacy and Athlete Preferences at Harvard

Furthermore, a Georgetown study shows that Asians apply to Ivy League schools even when their scores are too low to be admitted.

Under SAT-Only Admissions, Asian American Applicants to Selective Colleges Would Gain Fewer than 3,000 Seats Out of 120,000, Georgetown University Report Finds
21% of Asian American students at the most selective colleges would not have been admitted under a test-only admissions policy

Asian American applicants face lower acceptance rates at highly selective colleges compared to other racial and ethnic groups, but they are also much more likely to apply regardless of test scores. Even if standardized test scores were the only factor considered in admissions, the Asian American share of enrollment at selective colleges would increase by no more than 2 percentage points. The data do not support the claim that selective colleges adjust the number of Asian American students they admit to maintain a long-term racial balance of students. “If we used test-based merit as the singular admissions requirement, the gain for Asian American applicants would be marginal,” CEW Director and lead author Anthony P. Carnevale said. “But on the flip side, 21% of Asian American applicants who were previously admitted would no longer qualify.”


You're a liar Lisa. Now shut up.

This is the reality.

1738940235973.webp


The other one is that YOU were a DEI hire.
 
Chump blamed dei for a disaster. He said it was common sense that was the cause. What happened, did you see a squirrel?
The OP’s claim was every disaster since 1964.

If you’re going to come in hot, at least know what you’re taking about. Go hang your head in shame
 
Harvard has more Asians admitted than blacks, Hispanics and Native Americans combined. Whites were allowed into Harvard with lower scores than 1100 on legacy or ALDC'.

Admissions Statistics, A Brief Profile of the Admitted Class of 2028, Harvard welcomes students from across the country and all over, Admissions Statistics

Daniella Silva, Study on Harvard finds 43 percent of white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff, Study finds 43 percent of Harvard's white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff

Peter Arcidiacono, Josh Kinsler, Tyler Ransom, National Bureau Of Economic Research, Legacy And Athlete Preferences At Harvard, Working Paper 26316, Legacy and Athlete Preferences at Harvard

Furthermore, a Georgetown study shows that Asians apply to Ivy League schools even when their scores are too low to be admitted.

Under SAT-Only Admissions, Asian American Applicants to Selective Colleges Would Gain Fewer than 3,000 Seats Out of 120,000, Georgetown University Report Finds
21% of Asian American students at the most selective colleges would not have been admitted under a test-only admissions policy

Asian American applicants face lower acceptance rates at highly selective colleges compared to other racial and ethnic groups, but they are also much more likely to apply regardless of test scores. Even if standardized test scores were the only factor considered in admissions, the Asian American share of enrollment at selective colleges would increase by no more than 2 percentage points. The data do not support the claim that selective colleges adjust the number of Asian American students they admit to maintain a long-term racial balance of students. “If we used test-based merit as the singular admissions requirement, the gain for Asian American applicants would be marginal,” CEW Director and lead author Anthony P. Carnevale said. “But on the flip side, 21% of Asian American applicants who were previously admitted would no longer qualify.”


You're a liar Lisa. Now shut up.

This is the reality.

View attachment 1075643

The other one is that YOU were a DEI hire.
Gee all those “qualifications” and she couldn’t string a sentence together or remember her talking points.
 
Back
Top Bottom