Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Robert Mueller posted his evidence online. You would think Giuliani would do the same. Except that would mean people could see them, and prove whether or not the people lied on them.What "hotel ballroom meeting?" I have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
Do you really believe I'm going to post the contents of 250 affidavits in this forum?
They MUST get Trump to concede or the fraud will not work. They were hoping that a complete oversell of the bullshit results would pressure Trump to give it up.You lost....now concede....hurry up.
And, how many YEARS (not days) did it take for Mueller to post his evidence? You fucking idiot.Robert Mueller posted his evidence online. You would think Giuliani would do the same. Except that would mean people could see them, and prove whether or not the people lied on them.What "hotel ballroom meeting?" I have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
Do you really believe I'm going to post the contents of 250 affidavits in this forum?
With all these allegations of voter fraud, why didn't anybody take out their cellphone to document it?
Plenty of people did and there are clips all around.
But it's somewhat difficult to get video evidence since recording is not allowed near the ballots for obvious reasons. Then other avenues of evidence must be used.
"It" got tossed from court. What is "it"? Can you be factual and specific?It got tossed from court.
Repeating baseless accusations that have been tossed from court does not make it true.
With all these allegations of voter fraud, why didn't anybody take out their cellphone to document it?Plenty of people did and there are clips all around.
But it's somewhat difficult to get video evidence since recording is not allowed near the ballots for obvious reasons. Then other avenues of evidence must be used.
The ballots are in secret envelopes, in outer envelopes (for mail-in ballots) So documenting any fraud there would be perfectly legal.
It's in-person ballots that you can't take video of. So strangely you've shown that it's harder to catch in-person voter fraud, than mail-in ballot fraud.
You're conflating ballots with ballot envelopes.What is the obvious reason that recording is not allowed near the ballots? I sure can't think of one.
In Pennsylvania, in the middle of the night, after they stopped counting votes and sent everyone home, they found a batch of 600,000 votes, and 99.5% of them were for Biden.
I think I'm detecting just a wee little bit of fraud here.
The mainstream media hasn't reported this, as far as I'm aware.
Nope. Nothing to see here folks. This is not the voting fraud you are looking for. Move along. Move along.
"They could say or wave anything they wanted to without anyone examining any of their statements or wipe-ass pieces of paper."At any hearing, the panel is allowed to see the physical evidence being presented. They weren't just waving cookie recipes around in the air. Glad to educate you on how a hearing works.Who the fuck knows, there is no sourcing, it's just some paper they are holding up.
That was a Republican presser at a hotel, not any kind of actual formal government hearing.
They could say or wave anything they wanted to without anyone examining any of their statements or wipe-ass pieces of paper.
This is one of those things you ought to look up before opening your dummy mouth about educating someone.
For all the dumb asses, litigation takes time. You want these cases brought to trial in 3 days and if not.....
WHY HAVEN'T YOU PRESENTED ANY EVIDENCE!!!
Fucking idiots.
BECAUSE THEY WERE KEPT 25 FUCKING YARDS AWAY, YOU PIECE OF COCKSUCKING SHIT!!!!Why didn't they do what anyone would do and whip out their cell phone and takes pics/videos and alert the media?
BECAUSE IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
Link(s)? Show me what cases they were and give me the opinions of the Court and reasoning for dismissing.For all the dumb asses, litigation takes time. You want these cases brought to trial in 3 days and if not.....
WHY HAVEN'T YOU PRESENTED ANY EVIDENCE!!!
Fucking idiots.
34 judges have thrown these respective cases out for lack of evidence and/or the cases were deemed frivolous.
You know more about this than 34 judges?
www.propublica.org
BECAUSE THEY WERE KEPT 25 FUCKING YARDS AWAY, YOU PIECE OF COCKSUCKING SHIT!!!!Why didn't they do what anyone would do and whip out their cell phone and takes pics/videos and alert the media?
BECAUSE IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
And they're phones could only record up to 74 feet?BECAUSE THEY WERE KEPT 25 FUCKING YARDS AWAY, YOU PIECE OF COCKSUCKING SHIT!!!!Why didn't they do what anyone would do and whip out their cell phone and takes pics/videos and alert the media?
BECAUSE IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
Biden got 80.1 million votesBiden did get 278 million votes and T only 7 million
BECAUSE THEY WERE KEPT 25 FUCKING YARDS AWAY, YOU PIECE OF COCKSUCKING SHIT!!!!Why didn't they do what anyone would do and whip out their cell phone and takes pics/videos and alert the media?
BECAUSE IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
philadelphia.cbslocal.com
I do question it... But I don't out right throw it out either. You're absolutely right, they were not under oath. But the whole idea is to go to Trial. If they recant before the court nothing happens. If they stay with their current story... You should question that.Nobody was under oath, there was no testimony. Just bizarre rantings from face drip and others who spew all this bile but won't bring any of it into a court of law. You should question that.
And they're phones could only record up to 74 feet?BECAUSE THEY WERE KEPT 25 FUCKING YARDS AWAY, YOU PIECE OF COCKSUCKING SHIT!!!!Why didn't they do what anyone would do and whip out their cell phone and takes pics/videos and alert the media?
BECAUSE IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
