India Versus Pakistan WAR Looming.

Are you fucking retarded?

I mean, I know you are racist and you think it's only brown people dying, so no biggie.

But a nuclear exchange between Pakistan and India would have worldwide consequences that would make Covid look like a church picnic.


More than 100 million people could die immediately if India and Pakistan wage a nuclear war, followed by global mass starvation, according to a Rutgers coauthored study.

“Such a war would threaten not only the locations where bombs might be targeted but the entire world,” said Alan Robock, a Distinguished Professor in the Department of Environmental Sciences at Rutgers University–New Brunswick.

The research found that fires ignited by exploding nuclear weapons could release 16 million to 36 million tons of soot (black carbon) in smoke that would rise into the upper atmosphere, spreading around the world within weeks.

Actually, no. They didn't "found" it. Its just their assumption. And those assumptions looks like wrong.
The soot would absorb solar radiation, heating the air and boosting the smoke’s swift rise. Sunlight reaching Earth would decline by 20 to 35 percent, cooling the surface by 3.6 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit (2 to 5 degrees Celsius) and reducing precipitation by 15 to 30 percent, with larger regional impacts.

Vegetation growth would decline by 15 to 30 percent on land and ocean productivity would decline by 5 to 15 percent. Recovery from all these impacts would take more than 10 years because the smoke would linger in the upper atmosphere.
Just fairy tales.
But yes, political and economic impacts will be quite serious anyway.
 
India and Pakistan are preparing to go at it hammer and tongs.

Central to the fight is Kashmere region, water rights and number of militant Muslim Terrorist attacks

so India has canceled ALL Pakistani visas and all Pakistani have 48 hours to leave the nation. Pakistan retaliated by expelling India's diplomat.



Both got nukes and despise each other. Trump has bought out the hate in the entire world.

annie pp 1.56.gif
 
India and Pakistan are preparing to go at it hammer and tongs.
i dont thinks so, they love cricket too much

2 news are interconnected


Why ?
  • Pakistan has nuclear weapons; without them, it would be very difficult to defend Belarus against Moscow's predatory imperialism.
  • Due to connections with MI6-SAS, Pakistan practically saved Ukraine; from there, the Englishmen, via Cyprus, transported all the weapons from the beginning of the war.

FbqfA2EWAAUMYb_.webp

  • han-China: Pakistan has the best connections with han-China.
  • India is a long-time friend of Moscow's imperialism, so Belarus is strategically playing against India.
 
Not racist....only Democrats own that moniker. They are racist and actively discriminate against anyone who is not a sexual deviant or a minority performing terrorist actions or riots. Have you ever been to a DNC event? The number of white people and lack of minorities is nuts.

And I'm A-Political. Not a fan of either party..

Your side's racism speaks for itself.

So....
I'm fully aware of the consequences of a nuclear exchange between these two. It's not as bad as you say....but it won't be good.

India is a globally leading producer of medicines, cotton, and sugar.
Pakistan makes worthless pocket knives. Also cheap single edge razors. (Friends don't let friends shave with Pakistani steel)

So....this is gonna be a brew-haha.

Did you miss the parts about the result of a nuclear winter, or did you just not understand the science?
 
Did you miss the parts about the result of a nuclear winter, or did you just not understand the science?
There is not a lot of science in the conception of nuclear winter. It based on some false assumptions.

1. Nuclear war is mostly exchange of nuclear bursts in the cities. It's lie. Both India and Pakistan prefer to save their citizens to murder civilians of the adversary. Therefore the first strike is counter-force in the both side strategies.
2. Nuclear bursts in the cities will cause massive fires. It's lie. For most air conditions and yields of nukes, radius of demolition is larger than the radius of wood ignition. There will be no "city fires" (as there were in Hiroshima). There will be "soldering in debris".
3. Numerous city fires unite in a super-firestorm. It's lie. In the modern cities with their concrete buildings and wide streets small fires doesn't really spread and unite. Small towns don't have enough of organic to cause a firestorm.
4. Super-firestorm burn all organic in ash and send it stratosphere. Its lie. Super-firestorms means high temperature and it means that all organic is burning to CO_2 and H_2O. No ash, no sooth.
5. Sooth cause decreasing of temperature. Its lie. The guys simply ignore greenhouse effects of CO_2 and water vapour. It might even cause "global warming".
6. The lack of harvest cause starvation. Only if you don't reserves and can't take food from someone else.
 
There is not a lot of science in the conception of nuclear winter. It based on some false assumptions.

1. Nuclear war is mostly exchange of nuclear bursts in the cities. It's lie. Both India and Pakistan prefer to save their citizens to murder civilians of the adversary. Therefore the first strike is counter-force in the both side strategies.
2. Nuclear bursts in the cities will cause massive fires. It's lie. For most air conditions and yields of nukes, radius of demolition is larger than the radius of wood ignition. There will be no "city fires" (as there were in Hiroshima). There will be "soldering in debris".
3. Numerous city fires unite in a super-firestorm. It's lie. In the modern cities with their concrete buildings and wide streets small fires doesn't really spread and unite. Small towns don't have enough of organic to cause a firestorm.
4. Super-firestorm burn all organic in ash and send it stratosphere. Its lie. Super-firestorms means high temperature and it means that all organic is burning to CO_2 and H_2O. No ash, no sooth.
5. Sooth cause decreasing of temperature. Its lie. The guys simply ignore greenhouse effects of CO_2 and water vapour. It might even cause "global warming".
6. The lack of harvest cause starvation. Only if you don't reserves and can't take food from someone else.

Wow, Boris, you really don't seem to get why Nuclear war would be a bad thing for everyone.

I don't want to be in the position of "Taking food from someone else", and I'm not sure how you think that's a good idea.

Then again, you live in a country where you have the most land and still have to wait in line for food, and you think your leaders are so fucking smart.
 

Here’s why a flare-up between India and Pakistan over Kashmir matters

25 Apr 2025 ~~ By Sheikh Saaliq


NEW DELHI (AP) — India and Pakistan have intensified their hostilities over the hotly contested Kashmir region following a massacre of 26 mostly Indian tourists, which New Delhi linked to Pakistan.
Pakistan denies it was behind Tuesday’s attack by gunmen on a group of tourists in Kashmir. Both sides have since escalated the tensions by exchanging diplomatic and trade sanctions against each other and raising fears of a military conflict.
Here are five reasons why a flare-up between India and Pakistan.
The Kashmir attack can lead to an armed conflict between two neighbors
Kashmir is a nuclear flashpoint between the archrivals
A conflict could drag in China:

India and China are geopolitical rivals whose armies clashed along the disputed Himalayan border in 2020. Ties between the Asian giants have improved since but they still maintain large numbers of troops on their borders. Their borders are also contiguous to Pakistan’s, making it the world’s only three-way nuclear junction.​
Beijing also controls a part of the Kashmir region that New Delhi says belongs to India.​
On the other hand, China is also a main ally of Pakistan and has helped advance its missile programs, creating additional military concerns for New Delhi. Meanwhile, India maintains strong defense ties with the U.S., which has long sought to limit Beijing’s rise in the Indo-Pacific region.​
Kashmir tensions can lead to a war over water:
In response to the massacre, India suspended a crucial treaty that governs the flow of river waters into Pakistan. Pakistan said it would consider any attempt to stop the flow of water from India an “act of war.”​
Under the Indus Water treaty, India is obliged to let six rivers flow freely to Pakistan. If India follows through and restricts the flow, it can have a devastating impact on Pakistan’s agriculture as it battles acute water shortages.​

Connentary:
Hmm...., Two neighboring nuclear powers with nearly a century of mutual hate fighting each other again and we have a ‘why it matters’? When it comes to history,’bad blood’ and world-changing possible outcomes, Russia/Ukraine has nothing compared to India/Pakistan.
Have India and Pakistan ever been close to nuclear conflict in the time since both have publicly acknowledged having these weapons?
Indeed, lest we forget the Pakistani terror attack on Mumbai in 2008. Surely, the Indian government has not forgotten, nor are the concerns of the alliance of Pakistan and China.
 
wrong, oriental Moscow 🇷🇺imperialism is the sole antagonist in the Moscow-Ukraine war
ps

~~~~~~

Good riddance to Biden’s incompetent Ukraine policies​

24 Nov 2024 ~~ By Keith Naughton

For all the failings of the Biden administration, none is more clear-cut than the disaster that is its national security policy. The trail of misjudgments, failed negotiations and rank incompetence has no parallel in American history. Team Biden conducting national security policy is like watching a troop of baboons fly an airplane: You know it’s going to hit a mountain, you just don’t know when.
It all starts with deterrence, which the new breed of Democratic foreign policy boffins considers a relic.
~Snip~
Understanding and applying game theory is fundamental to geopolitics, particularly in times of potential and real conflict. It is not a relic, and the multi-year Biden policy fiasco in Ukraine proves it.
~Snip~
Why did Russian President Vladimir Putin invade Ukraine? For the same reason wars are always started — Putin thought he could get away with it. And he was partly correct. The first reaction from Team Biden was to give up and run away. It was only resoluteness by Ukraine’s leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, that forced the West’s hand.
The timid aid process for Ukraine has hardly restored deterrence. Team Biden has seen Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro thumb his nose and steal another election, Hamas and Israel ignore Team Biden’s entreaties, and Iran arm their Houthi proxies and attack Red Sea shipping.

Commentary:
In essence the incompetence of Joey Xi Baidung and his keystone kop advisors screwed the pooch on each and every National Security Foreign Policy.
"Their incompetence has lengthened the Ukraine war, made it more dangerous and jeopardized domestic political support — a barely comprehensible trifecta of post-modernist neurotic bumbling. Even worse, a dynamic has developed due to Team Biden’s incompetence: Their weakness has encouraged Putin to bluster and bluff. Finding that his nuclear threats caused very public trembling in the West, Putin became quite cavalier about it."
 
Biden’s incompetent
did i say that Biden was competent ?

still, all what we need to do :
 
Back
Top Bottom