Is Trump broken!?

I don't know about whether Trump's done. Hillary rightfully has horrible "truth" numbers, but Trump's are rightfully worse.

Mitt was not truly done until Clint came out with the empty chair, which was funnier than most parodies, and it wasn't a parody. Old, out of touch, wayyyy too white.

The main attack against Hillary was her odious fund raising for the Foundations and use of emails. Benghazi is red meat for the faithful, but Hillary's also weak in being blamed for the ME, which frankly was handed to Obama by W, but it was a festering would even before W. So blaming her is really blaming Tues morning for the sun being so bright in the east, but hey .... somebody always gets blamed.

Trump would not be toast if he could get back on message. But his "big speech" for Monday appears to be telling us how bad the Clintons were 20 years ago. Wow.

And therein lays the gop problem. Trump''s message is a wall Mexico will pay for (not happening). He's going to bring back jobs by renogiating trade deals (Ford is not closing Mexico plants and GM is not closing china plants.) All illegals will be deported, even those with kids who are citizens (nah) Trump's gonna make the rich pay more taxes. (put down the bong)

There are legit issues on immigration, trade and wealth inequality. But Trump never bothered to create any actual policy to deal with them. So getting BACK on track is hard when you have no track to get back to.

The gop was hoping for Hillary and the emails. And they are damning, esp in terms of her truthfulness. But the Trump U suit is bad, and the NY AG action is much worse, because it involves Rico (racketeering). That and it's been know for a decade that Trump has left contractors and suppliers stuck with unpaid bills for work done that he accepted.

He's a horrible candidate. I have no sympathy for the gop elite that seems to say "people voted for him, so we have to support him, even if he is a racist crook." They didn't have to. Less than half were voting for him. The charges against him are not new, the gop just chose to let him bitch slap the other candidates while for some reason it was wrong to speak ill of Trump.

As to whether he's done ... I suppose it is more of whether Hillary will finish him off with a clean kill. It seems to me that her biggest news (propaganda) weakness is for policy, which is pretty funny since we're not at war with Iran and they have no nuke. And ISIS is losing. But like Trump the racist and Trump U, what the reality appears to be is often less real than merely a kernel of truth. Maybe she should let Warren and Bernie and Obama work the base, and maybe she needs a guy like Gates, whom Trump can claim is the problem, but when push comes to shove everyone going back to HW Bush will got to the mat over.


Excellent, I read every word of your post. You are 100% spot on.

I first read about the Trump U charges in February, when the BBB's website laid out the whole story after Trump got into a pissing contest with Megyn Kelly about Trump U's BBB rating. There is no rating because it's been out of business since 2013. I was wondering then why the press wasn't talking about the NY Supreme Court's decision to turn it back to the AG with suggested charges of fraud. Wow.

Now USA Today is reporting about contractor's who got stiffed and gypped by Trump. Yeah, that's how you get to be a billionaire. Don't pay your bills and then file bankruptcy. He's a fucking asshole. Bottom line.

 
and is he broke?

Why won't he release his tax returns? Practically every GOP nominee since the 1970s has. Being under audit doesn't change a damn thing or in any way hinder a taxpayer's returns and negotiations with the IRS. He's a lying bag of shit.

CHRIS WALLACE
"Every Republican nominee since Richard Nixon, who at one time was under an audit, has released their tax returns."
— PunditFact on Wednesday, May 18th, 2016
All Mostly True statements involving Chris Wallace | PunditFact


""Each Republican nominee in the past nine presidential elections has released his tax returns: Ronald Reagan (1980, 1984), George H. W. Bush (1988, 1992), Bob Dole (1996), George W. Bush (2000, 2004), John McCain (2008) and Mitt Romney (2012).

That leaves one nominee since Nixon, Nixon’s vice president, Gerald Ford."""

rulings%2Ftom-mostlytrue.gif
 
Donald Trump backs down on comments about District Judge Gonzalo Curiel

Nooooo!!!

Say it ain't Soooopp!!

Trump back down from his statement about Curiel, leaving a lot of his supporters out to dry when they came out to fight for him.

Trump said Curiels heritage does not make him incapable of being impartial!!

Why did Trump fold? Is it because the RNC betray him? Did the MSM break him?

Did Hillary anal rape him, beat him and left him in the ditch to die?

Well, if Trump keep falling to his knees like this, that's what Hillary going to do!!

Look at your nominee, right wingers!! He is on his knees and kissing ass so he can be accepted. Trump should never back down. Now he is just another weakling bent over for Hillary's PC America!!

. What a sad sad sight!

Trump has never been whole in the first place. He's nothing but a douche bag realtor from Queens who shystered his way into Manhattan.
 
Obviously.

Why anyone is sticking with this guy is the real mystery.
David Koch Won't Fund Trump Coronation in Cleveland
Source: Bloomberg

David Koch, one of the biggest backers of the 2012 Republican National Convention, won't support the party's next gathering in July where Donald Trump is expected to be named the party's presidential nominee.

Neither David nor his brother Charles will contribute to the RNC Host Committee this year, said Kenneth Spain, a spokesman for their company, Koch Industries. The billionaires are among the country's biggest and most influential conservative donors.

The Kochs' political organization, which plans to spend some $450 million on conservative causes this year, has made no secret of its distaste for Trump. Charles Koch said in an interview with USA Today this week that Trump would have to shift his stance on a number of policies in order to win his support, and that he found the candidate's recent comments about a judge's Mexican heritage "unacceptable."

The Kochs' refusal to support the convention suggests that Trump's alienation of some of the party's biggest donors has ramifications beyond the presidential race. While the focus of the gathering, scheduled to begin on July 18 in Cleveland, is on the selection of a presidential nominee, it's also an important opportunity for thousands of the party's activists, candidates, and donors to rub elbows.

David Koch, 76, gave $1 million to support the convention in Tampa, Florida, four years ago, making him one of the top individual supporters, and he also attended as a delegate from New York. He isn't a delegate this year and doesn't plan on attending the convention at all, Spain confirmed.


Read more: David Koch Won’t Fund Trump Coronation in Cleveland
 
Elizabeth Warren is going to open a can of whoopass on that guy, the likes not seen since medieval times.

Watch.

#LOLGOP

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
 
The Latest: Trump yanks Washington Post credentials


Sorry, this loser is in no way qualified to be president of the local dairy collective, let alone the presidency. This authoritarian whackjob rejects the tenets of American democracy. Freedom of the press which is in the 1ST AMENDMENT is something he doesn't want to tolerate.

Sorry chump, it's in the Constitution, your opinion on it is meaningless. You dopes that support this loon, do you no longer support the Constitution of the United States? Trump cannot be president, he is a walking colostomy bag.
 

Forum List

Back
Top