It saddens me to see the continuation of justice delayed/denied.

[Rawley]

Allow me to answer all your questions. Repairing the Rule of Law: An Agenda for Post-Trump Reform

Sad that you can't defend your own posts. Oh well.

 

[Crepitus]

View attachment 1043996

Dude, I'm talking about his age and general poor health, not threatening to do him in.

 

[justoffal]

Dude, I'm talking about his age and general poor health, not threatening to do him in.

Yes....I understand... understood...

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Berg has a lot of people on ignore

He needs a safe space echo chamber.

Where the hell's the fun in that? I never understood people who use the ignore feature.

 

[Nostra]

Georgia appeals court postpones Trump arguments​

Donald Trump’s criminal case in Georgia is now on hold — indefinitely.

The Georgia Court of Appeals announced Monday that it has canceled arguments that were set for next month in the president-elect’s bid to kick Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis off of the case in which he’s charged with conspiring to corrupt Georgia’s 2020 election results.

The one-page order, signed by the clerk of the court, doesn’t explain the decision to scuttle the scheduled Dec. 5 arguments or identify which judges signed off on it. All four of Trump’s criminal cases have now faced delays since his election to a second presidential term.

A spokesperson for Willis and an attorney for Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/18/georgia-appeals-court-postpones-trump-arguments-00190286

trump supporters would have us believe Fani Willis is corrupt. Alvin Bragg is corrupt. Judge Lewis Kaplan is corrupt. Letisha James is corrupt. Jack Smith is corrupt. Judge Juan Merchan is corrupt. Judge Tanya Chutkan is corrupt. AG Merrick Garland is corrupt. Every member of every grand jury that voted to indict trump and his co-defendants is corrupt. In order for you not to be corrupt your actions must align with trump's wishes. Like Judge Aileen Cannon.

Essentially, they would have us believe anyone involved in the prosecution of trump's alleged and adjudicated crimes is inherently corrupt by virtue of the fact they are involved in the prosecution. How did they come to this conclusion? trump, the defendant, who worked with his co-conspirators to launch a scheme to hold on to power using slates of fake electors, who refused to comply with a subpoena demanding the return of classified documents in his possession, told them to believe it. And obediently, they did.

If you were facing multiple criminal indictments in multiple jurisdictions, but could make those cases go away before being adjudicated, how could you make appear as though justice was served when in fact it was not?

“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.”

Poor berg80 accept your crushing defeat, loser.

 

[justoffal]

He isn't going to jail because the cases were bogus.

Ahhh....it's pretty much the last thing they have to cling onto. It will all away when there is no fulfillment.

 

[justoffal]

Where the hell's the fun in that? I never understood people who use the ignore feature.

Yeah ... You miss too much...one of the reasons for being here is confrontation.

 

[kyzr]

Your column? I guess you think that lie will impress readers. The thing is, Turley is a shill for anyone who will pay him or give him attention.

Turley is a Law Professor at GWU. You will see how the Lawfare plays out and who is right.

Turley's LEGAL arguments are irrefutable.

 

[scruffy]

There was no lawfare, prosecutorial misconduct, or anything illegal in pursuing prosecution of trump's alleged crimes.

Sure, leftard. Keep trying, maybe you can find someone gullible enough to believe your bullshit.

The opportunity for the public to judge his guilt or innocence based on the outcome of the cases being decided in courts of law, except for the two cases he lost, is likely over. It's a travesty of justice pure and simple.

Your head is going to explode when every single J6 political prisoners gets pardoned.

 

[Lisa558]

There was no lawfare, prosecutorial misconduct, or anything illegal in pursuing prosecution of trump's alleged crimes. The opportunity for the public to judge his guilt or innocence based on the outcome of the cases being decided in courts of law, except for the two cases he lost, is likely over. It's a travesty of justice pure and simple.

The public will judge on the two cases he supposedly “lost” - the one where he paid his loan back according to terms and the one where he paid a non-disclosure fee - when they go to Appeal and the entire world sees how the Dems fabricated charges in order to damage their political opponent.

 

[berg80]

Grand Juries in handpicked jurisdictions

Horseshit. But you ineffectual attempt to attack the credibility of the grand jury's decisions is noted.

 

[berg80]

Turley's LEGAL arguments are irrefutable.

He's a shill for conservatives who likes face time on TV.

Jonathan Turley Defends William Barr | Law & Crime

Attorney and law professor Jonathan Turley on Tuesday penned an op-ed defending his friend Attorney General William Barr against what he describes as a “Kafkaesque” rush to judgement.

lawandcrime.com

 

[justoffal]

The public will judge on the two cases he supposedly “lost” - the one where he paid his loan back according to terms and the one where he paid a non-disclosure fee - when they go to Appeal and the entire world sees how the Dems fabricated charges in order to damage their political opponent.

Pretty much what everyone said was going to happen from the very outset.
The New York case in fact both New York cases are more chewing gum and string than they are legal leverage.

 

[berg80]

Sad that you can't defend your own posts. Oh well.

I didn't need to. The author of the article did. If you don't accept the factual material he provided that's your business.

 

[berg80]

The public will judge on the two cases he supposedly “lost”

The judge and jury already have, based on the facts.

 

[Lisa558]

The judge and jury already have, based on the facts.

The judge and jury were biased, which is why we need for the Appeal Court to rule.

 

[Rawley]

I didn't need to. The author of the article did. If you don't accept the factual material he provided that's your business.

Sorry, not reading a ten page rant by a loon that starts his screed with a "Trumpian tunnel" simply because you cannot support your argument.

 

[berg80]

The judge and jury were biased, which is why we need for the Appeal Court to rule.

But for trumples a guilty verdict necessarily equates to a sign of bias and acquittal is a sign of fairness. The real world isn't like that.

 

[Lisa558]

But for trumples a guilty verdict necessarily equates to a sign of bias and acquittal is a sign of fairness. The real world isn't like that.

Oh please…..Americans saw through all the fake lawfare.

 

[kyzr]

He's a shill for conservatives who likes face time on TV.

Two things can be true. Turley is a FNC contributor AND a legal expert as a current LAW PROFESSOR.