the_human_being
Gold Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 15,277
- 2,741
- 290
A lot of companies don't. Most food service companies don't as well as many others. You said the company that makes her line of clothes. Does she actually own that company? Cindy Crawford has a line of furniture that bears her name and she does commercials in support, Cindy does not however, own the furniture company itself. Does Michael Jordan own Nike? I don't think so.
Good point, and that's why...
That’s why [Sarah Jane] Glynn says, “Paid family leave is a fundamental, basic labor right to which all people should have access.” It shouldn’t be up to businesses alone to provide the benefit, she adds. “As a society, we need to provide that. Leaving it fully up to the market is not the best mindset to understand this issue.”
Especially because, just as the life circumstances that might require someone to take leave from work — and get paid for that time — are out of an individual’s control, there are also circumstances that might prohibit a business from being able to provide paid family leave to its employees, even if it might want to.
“This is a large-scale societal issue,” says Glynn. “Everyone needs benefits for when people can’t work, for whatever reason, whether because someone has had a baby or whether someone is trying to take care of their mom who is really ill.” The thinking behind not doing businesses with companies that don’t provide paid family leave “makes sense as a model, but my concern is that if this is only expected of employers to do, there will always be some companies that, for whatever reason, have a really hard time being able to do so,” she adds. “There are lots of factors that make it hard for businesses [to be able to provide paid family leave] on their own that have nothing to do with selfishness or greed or not wanting to do the right thing.”
Furthermore, Glynn explains, countries that do make paid family leave available only through an employer mandate often end up seeing widespread employment discrimination as a result.
“If you’re expecting businesses to take [paid family leave] on 100 percent themselves — if you’re just looking at maternity leave, for example, it can make people reticent to hire women,” points out Glynn. “It makes hiring young women more expensive if a company is expected to be paying maternity leave 100 percent themselves.”
Which is why Glynn feels that paid leave is absolutely essential, but it needs to be addressed outside of the private sector — namely, with the federal government’s involvement.
[Sarah Jane] Glynn explains that the vast majority of other countries, and every other advanced economy, offers paid family leave as a government benefit; in none of these economies are businesses themselves expected to provide paid leave to their employees 100 percent on their own. The U.S., by comparison, is the only country in which it’s up to employers to fully and independently fund any kind of paid leave offered to their employees.
RWNJ hero D. Trump understands average Joe's and Jane's need help with Family Paid Leave/maternity leave but-----but D. Trump is so far removed from the reality of everyday peoples-everyday lives that he doesn't understand that a tax break for family/maternity leave would be a benefit for people with high incomes but do very little to nothing for the low the income people he professes to want to help.
That's exactly what we need -- more government meddling. Soon, they will be allocating the times you can go pee in a day.