Judge blocks Trumps EO to end birthright citizenship

[Slade3200]

You keep pretending to miss the common sense part that must be applied in both scenarios.

The element you’re talking about is why I’d vote that a child of two non citizens should not make that child a citizen. If the issue was up for a vote that’s where I would land. But it’s not up for a vote. We do have a constitution and we have a 14th amendment. Just because I don’t agree with some elements of it doesn’t mean I’m going to lie about it or snub the law like you are doing

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You keep pretending to miss the common sense part that must be applied in both scenarios.

Gaslighting. There is no equivalency at all.

 

[teddyearp]

Then the judge was paid to do so. the 14A says those born in america AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF are citizens. Birthright citizenship violates the 14A.

Exactly. The only jurisdiction one who entered this country illegally is subject to is deportation for breaking the law. Pretty cut and dried to me. But it takes a Harvard or Yale degree to rewrite it complicated style.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Exactly. The only jurisdiction one who entered this country illegally is subject to is deportation for breaking the law. Pretty cut and dried to me. But it takes a Harvard or Yale degree to rewrite it complicated style.

Teddy, you are babbling again.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

That's totally twisted. That's what hatred does to person's values , corrupts them completely.

HAHAHAHA. The board notes you have no answer and so sink to name-calling. Sorry i ruined your day.

 

[Slade3200]

Then the judge was paid to do so. the 14A says those born in america AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF are citizens. Birthright citizenship violates the 14A.

The SCOTUS ruled on a case where two undocumented immigrants had a child on US soil. That child was deemed to be a US citizen. The 14th was interpreted by SCOTUS and precedent set. If you want to change it then legislate and change the constitution. But don’t lie about our laws

 

[BrokeLoser]

The SCOTUS ruled on a case where two undocumented immigrants had a child on US soil. That child was deemed to be a US citizen. The 14th was interpreted by SCOTUS and precedent set. If you want to change it then legislate and change the constitution. But don’t lie about our laws

I remember when purple hair people said Roe was case law/precedent…they said it would never be overturned.

 

[Slade3200]

I remember when purple hair people said Roe was case law/precedent…they said it would never be overturned.

I remember that too

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I remember when purple hair people said Roe was case law/precedent…they said it would never be overturned.

That is one of maybe four major precedents ignored in more than 200 years.