Laughing at Democrats!!!!!

[The Rabbi]

Does anyone see the connection here because I dont. Its almost like hes saying you cannot be a victim because politicians exist.

Great post btw...awesome

The inability to read and derive logical information marks someone as having lower intelligence. Not like that's a shock in your case.

No, the point made is that poor/entitlement people, being more numerous, are the ones who elect many politicians, who come into office pledged to increase subsidies to those people. But if they are the ones essentially in power through their elected reps then how can they be the victims of anything?

Because people being victims are a separate issue from who you elect? I'm just thinking out loud here but people elect politicians they are not responsible for what that pol decides to do once in office.

The inability to draw reasonable inferences from what is read marks the inferior intelligence.

 

[ClosedCaption]

You say that every post...just skip that part and expla....oh I see. You cant.

 

[Iceweasel]

But people get free cell phones thanks to Republican presidents. Reagan started the LifeLine program and Bush changed it to include cell phones.

That was Clinton and a big expansion from what Reagan started. And it's grown....

Lifeline (Obama Phone) - Federal Safety Net

LIFELINE (Obama Phone)
The Lifeline program is a $9.25 per month phone bill subsidy available to low-income Americans. Telecommunication Companies administer the program directly with consumers by reducing their phone bill and then obtaining reimbursement from the federal government. The subsidy can be used for residential phone service or cell phone service. The program is paid for by a tax on all business, residential and cell phone usage. The program is administered by the FCC (Federal Communications Commission).

 

[Jarhead]

Does anyone see the connection here because I dont. Its almost like hes saying you cannot be a victim because politicians exist.

Great post btw...awesome

The inability to read and derive logical information marks someone as having lower intelligence. Not like that's a shock in your case.

No, the point made is that poor/entitlement people, being more numerous, are the ones who elect many politicians, who come into office pledged to increase subsidies to those people. But if they are the ones essentially in power through their elected reps then how can they be the victims of anything?

Because people being victims are a separate issue from who you elect? I'm just thinking out loud here but people elect politicians they are not responsible for what that pol decides to do once in office.

they are when they re-elect said politician DESPITE said politicians actions during the first term.

 

[The Rabbi]

You say that every post...just skip that part and expla....oh I see. You cant.

The inability to draw reasonable conclusions from what was read marks an inferior intelligence.

You don't have to prove my statement with every post. You just need to quit posting.

 

[ClosedCaption]

The inability to read and derive logical information marks someone as having lower intelligence. Not like that's a shock in your case.

No, the point made is that poor/entitlement people, being more numerous, are the ones who elect many politicians, who come into office pledged to increase subsidies to those people. But if they are the ones essentially in power through their elected reps then how can they be the victims of anything?

Because people being victims are a separate issue from who you elect? I'm just thinking out loud here but people elect politicians they are not responsible for what that pol decides to do once in office.

they are when they re-elect said politician DESPITE said politicians actions during the first term.

No, I thought the right was all about personal responsibility. Now you're trying to sell me that I am responsible for the actions of people I vote for too?

Uh no..

 

[Jarhead]

Because people being victims are a separate issue from who you elect? I'm just thinking out loud here but people elect politicians they are not responsible for what that pol decides to do once in office.

they are when they re-elect said politician DESPITE said politicians actions during the first term.

No, I thought the right was all about personal responsibility. Now you're trying to sell me that I am responsible for the actions of people I vote for too?

Uh no..

lol...of course not. "not my fault I voted for the guy...and again...and again. Sure, the guy sucked every term, but not my fault. I simply voted for him"

You come across more and more like a child with every post I read of yours.

 

[Erand7899]

5. The poor keep getting poorer – yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

Wouldn't that indicate that the poor are actually getting less poor?

No. It indicates that the definition of being poor has evolved here in the US. And that is a good thing. None of us want our poor to suffer like they do in other countries. Our poor suffer...sure....but not like our poor suffered a half a decade ago.

Surprised you don't see it that way.

I actually believe you do.....but too much into knocking a debate opponent to admit it.

It would be a healthier debate, if you actually defined the poor correctly, and separated the poor from those in poverty. Poverty can be defined as those who have insufficient resources of their own to provide for the basic needs of food, shelter, clothing. etc.. The poor do have sufficient resouces to provide for all basic needs, but little more. The poor can get along without help from anyone, and ususally do so. Those in poverty can not, and they must rely on charity and/or government assistance.

If we were just providing for those in poverty, we could easily justify it, and the cost would be acceptable. However, the liberal/socialists also want us to subsidize the poor and somehow lift them up into the middle class. This not only can not be done, it destroys the independence and drive of the poor.

 

[Jarhead]

Wouldn't that indicate that the poor are actually getting less poor?

No. It indicates that the definition of being poor has evolved here in the US. And that is a good thing. None of us want our poor to suffer like they do in other countries. Our poor suffer...sure....but not like our poor suffered a half a decade ago.

Surprised you don't see it that way.

I actually believe you do.....but too much into knocking a debate opponent to admit it.

It would be a healthier debate, if you actually defined the poor correctly, and separated the poor from those in poverty. Poverty can be defined as those who have insufficient resources of their own to provide for the basic needs of food, shelter, clothing. etc.. The poor do have sufficient resouces to provide for all basic needs, but little more. The poor can get along without help from anyone, and ususally do so. Those in poverty can not, and they must rely on charity and/or government assistance.

If we were just providing for those in poverty, we could easily justify it, and the cost would be acceptable. However, the liberal/socialists also want us to subsidize the poor and somehow lift them up into the middle class. This not only can not be done, it destroys the independence and drive of the poor.

THIS (above) is EXACTLY what the debate should be about.

None of us want to see a child hungry.

Many of us don't believe that one is "struggling" and in need of help if they have food, shelter, warmth, access to education...but no cell phone.

 

[buckeye45_73]

When did you turn on the ultra rich plutocrats that you used to love so much?

It is not my fault that the ultra rich are subsidized by the government. (to big to fail ring a bell)

Not my fault that the ultra wealthy play the "victim" card all the damn time. You even play it for the them.

Not my fault that the ultra wealthy are able to buy their politicians. All the while playing the victim card.

And of course with the ultra wealthy running the government, they keep getting richer and the poor keep getting poorer. And you seem surprised.

And by God, the poor can shop at Goodwill and buy all kinds of shit that the poor in Africa can only dream about. Oh boy. Do we live in Africa? No. So what fucking difference does it make? Send Goodwill to Africa and they to can buy cheap used shit.

About the only fact you actually got right on purpose was that the poor keep getting poorer and the rich richer.

lol. The poor can shop at goodwill. I didn't know that goodwill gives out free cell phones, new nike athletic shoes, flat screen TV's and an AC in every room.

People like you are so ignorant to reality it is almost humorous.

But then again, you are one who SWORE you were in the mortgage industry for a lifetime so you would know more about what caused the housing bubble than anyone else in a mortgage thread....and then said "FM writes thousands of loans"...when, in fact, anyone who is in the industry would know they wrote zero.

So you are not only ignorant...you are a liar.

But people get free cell phones thanks to Republican presidents. Reagan started the LifeLine program and Bush changed it to include cell phones.

link?

but you are saying republicans helped poor people, doesnt that break the imagemcreated by the left......hmmm so its not someasy as lefties think.....interesting.....ill check to make sure this is legit

 

[Duped]

The definition of Conundrum is something that is puzzling or confusing; a riddle.


Here are six Conundrums of socialism in the United States of America:


1. America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized.

2. Half of the population is subsidized – yet they think they are victims.

3. They think they are victims – yet their representatives run the government.

4. Their representatives run the government – yet the poor keep getting poorer.

5. The poor keep getting poorer – yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about – yet they want America to be more like those other countries.


Think about it! And that, my friends, pretty much sums up the USA in the early 21st Century.


Conundrums of Socialism in America » The Florida Cracker


Fascinating huh??!!!!


Is this not hysterical? Certainly proves one thing beyond a shadow of a doubt.......that a large percentage of the people who vote Democrat are pretty much brainless.

Poignant Poetry

 

[skookerasbil]

The definition of Conundrum is something that is puzzling or confusing; a riddle.


Here are six Conundrums of socialism in the United States of America:


1. America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized.

2. Half of the population is subsidized – yet they think they are victims.

3. They think they are victims – yet their representatives run the government.

4. Their representatives run the government – yet the poor keep getting poorer.

5. The poor keep getting poorer – yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about – yet they want America to be more like those other countries.


Think about it! And that, my friends, pretty much sums up the USA in the early 21st Century.


Conundrums of Socialism in America » The Florida Cracker


Fascinating huh??!!!!


Is this not hysterical? Certainly proves one thing beyond a shadow of a doubt.......that a large percentage of the people who vote Democrat are pretty much brainless.

When did you turn on the ultra rich plutocrats that you used to love so much?

It is not my fault that the ultra rich are subsidized by the government. (to big to fail ring a bell)

Not my fault that the ultra wealthy play the "victim" card all the damn time. You even play it for the them.

Not my fault that the ultra wealthy are able to buy their politicians. All the while playing the victim card.

And of course with the ultra wealthy running the government, they keep getting richer and the poor keep getting poorer. And you seem surprised.

And by God, the poor can shop at Goodwill and buy all kinds of shit that the poor in Africa can only dream about. Oh boy. Do we live in Africa? No. So what fucking difference does it make? Send Goodwill to Africa and they to can buy cheap used shit.

About the only fact you actually got right on purpose was that the poor keep getting poorer and the rich richer.

lol. The poor can shop at goodwill. I didn't know that goodwill gives out free cell phones, new nike athletic shoes, flat screen TV's and an AC in every room.

People like you are so ignorant to reality it is almost humorous.

But then again, you are one who SWORE you were in the mortgage industry for a lifetime so you would know more about what caused the housing bubble than anyone else in a mortgage thread....and then said "FM writes thousands of loans"...when, in fact, anyone who is in the industry would know they wrote zero.

So you are not only ignorant...you are a liar.

yeah, well, Zeke is one of those guys hopelessly trapped in the matrix hate America bubble......blames all societal problems on the wealthy.

 

[skookerasbil]

The definition of Conundrum is something that is puzzling or confusing; a riddle.


Here are six Conundrums of socialism in the United States of America:


1. America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized.

2. Half of the population is subsidized – yet they think they are victims.

3. They think they are victims – yet their representatives run the government.

4. Their representatives run the government – yet the poor keep getting poorer.

5. The poor keep getting poorer – yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about – yet they want America to be more like those other countries.


Think about it! And that, my friends, pretty much sums up the USA in the early 21st Century.


Conundrums of Socialism in America » The Florida Cracker


Fascinating huh??!!!!


Is this not hysterical? Certainly proves one thing beyond a shadow of a doubt.......that a large percentage of the people who vote Democrat are pretty much brainless.

Poignant Poetry

Indeed......showed it to my 14 year old and he laughed has ass off.

 

[LeftofLeft]

When did you turn on the ultra rich plutocrats that you used to love so much?

It is not my fault that the ultra rich are subsidized by the government. (to big to fail ring a bell)

Not my fault that the ultra wealthy play the "victim" card all the damn time. You even play it for the them.

Not my fault that the ultra wealthy are able to buy their politicians. All the while playing the victim card.

And of course with the ultra wealthy running the government, they keep getting richer and the poor keep getting poorer. And you seem surprised.

And by God, the poor can shop at Goodwill and buy all kinds of shit that the poor in Africa can only dream about. Oh boy. Do we live in Africa? No. So what fucking difference does it make? Send Goodwill to Africa and they to can buy cheap used shit.

About the only fact you actually got right on purpose was that the poor keep getting poorer and the rich richer.

lol. The poor can shop at goodwill. I didn't know that goodwill gives out free cell phones, new nike athletic shoes, flat screen TV's and an AC in every room.

People like you are so ignorant to reality it is almost humorous.

But then again, you are one who SWORE you were in the mortgage industry for a lifetime so you would know more about what caused the housing bubble than anyone else in a mortgage thread....and then said "FM writes thousands of loans"...when, in fact, anyone who is in the industry would know they wrote zero.

So you are not only ignorant...you are a liar.

But people get free cell phones thanks to Republican presidents. Reagan started the LifeLine program and Bush changed it to include cell phones.

Impossible! The Left has taught US that Reagan Bush were against the poor. Are you telling US that Reagan and Bush weren't so bad after all in the eyes of the poor??

 

[NYcarbineer]

The definition of Conundrum is something that is puzzling or confusing; a riddle.


Here are six Conundrums of socialism in the United States of America:


1. America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized.

2. Half of the population is subsidized – yet they think they are victims.

3. They think they are victims – yet their representatives run the government.

4. Their representatives run the government – yet the poor keep getting poorer.

5. The poor keep getting poorer – yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about – yet they want America to be more like those other countries.


Think about it! And that, my friends, pretty much sums up the USA in the early 21st Century.


Conundrums of Socialism in America » The Florida Cracker


Fascinating huh??!!!!


Is this not hysterical? Certainly proves one thing beyond a shadow of a doubt.......that a large percentage of the people who vote Democrat are pretty much brainless.

Who got poorer when Medicaid became law?

Anyone? Can anyone help skooker out? He seems to have been rendered mute.

 

[Faun]

lol. The poor can shop at goodwill. I didn't know that goodwill gives out free cell phones, new nike athletic shoes, flat screen TV's and an AC in every room.

People like you are so ignorant to reality it is almost humorous.

But then again, you are one who SWORE you were in the mortgage industry for a lifetime so you would know more about what caused the housing bubble than anyone else in a mortgage thread....and then said "FM writes thousands of loans"...when, in fact, anyone who is in the industry would know they wrote zero.

So you are not only ignorant...you are a liar.

But people get free cell phones thanks to Republican presidents. Reagan started the LifeLine program and Bush changed it to include cell phones.

Nope. It is Obama who is giving away free cell phones. Just watch this confirmed Obama voter explain it succinctly.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio]Original Obamaphone Lady: Obama Voter Says Vote for Obama because he gives a free Phone - YouTube[/ame]

Moron ... free phones were available even before Obama became president. Why do you think just because there are people who get phones through the LifeLine program under Obama, that it started with him?? Do you really want people here to think you're as stupid as you sound??

Reagan started the program back in 1985. Bush expanded the program to include cell phones in 2005.

FCC: Lifeline Program

 

[Faun]

But people get free cell phones thanks to Republican presidents. Reagan started the LifeLine program and Bush changed it to include cell phones.

That was Clinton and a big expansion from what Reagan started. And it's grown....

Lifeline (Obama Phone) - Federal Safety Net

LIFELINE (Obama Phone)
The Lifeline program is a $9.25 per month phone bill subsidy available to low-income Americans. Telecommunication Companies administer the program directly with consumers by reducing their phone bill and then obtaining reimbursement from the federal government. The subsidy can be used for residential phone service or cell phone service. The program is paid for by a tax on all business, residential and cell phone usage. The program is administered by the FCC (Federal Communications Commission).

Not sure how you see a "big expansion" under Clinton, but say nothing about it under Reagan given the number increased by roughly 2 million for each. Regardless, Reagan started the program.

 

[Iceweasel]

But people get free cell phones thanks to Republican presidents. Reagan started the LifeLine program and Bush changed it to include cell phones.

That was Clinton and a big expansion from what Reagan started. And it's grown....

Lifeline (Obama Phone) - Federal Safety Net

LIFELINE (Obama Phone)
The Lifeline program is a $9.25 per month phone bill subsidy available to low-income Americans. Telecommunication Companies administer the program directly with consumers by reducing their phone bill and then obtaining reimbursement from the federal government. The subsidy can be used for residential phone service or cell phone service. The program is paid for by a tax on all business, residential and cell phone usage. The program is administered by the FCC (Federal Communications Commission).

Not sure how you see a "big expansion" under Clinton, but say nothing about it under Reagan given the number increased by roughly 2 million for each. Regardless, Reagan started the program.

Reagan started a discount phone service for the poor, the big expansion is on Obama.


Who Started the Obama Phone?
“Who started the Obama Phone?” is one of the questions that’s asked most frequently about this government program.

The simple answer is that any number of Presidents could claim credit for it, but the program is usually called the Obama Phone because it expanded so rapidly during his administration.

Some authorities go back even further and say the Obama Phone program can trace its roots back to the Clinton administration because that’s when the Federal Communications Commission authorized a subsidy for landline telephones as part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Act authorized subsidized landline telephones for America’s needy and it was approved by both houses of Congress and signed into law by President Clinton.

 

[The Rabbi]

But people get free cell phones thanks to Republican presidents. Reagan started the LifeLine program and Bush changed it to include cell phones.

Nope. It is Obama who is giving away free cell phones. Just watch this confirmed Obama voter explain it succinctly.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio]Original Obamaphone Lady: Obama Voter Says Vote for Obama because he gives a free Phone - YouTube[/ame]

Moron ... free phones were available even before Obama became president. Why do you think just because there are people who get phones through the LifeLine program under Obama, that it started with him?? Do you really want people here to think you're as stupid as you sound??

Reagan started the program back in 1985. Bush expanded the program to include cell phones in 2005.

FCC: Lifeline Program

So are you saying the Cleveland Cell Phone Lady is wrong? Why do you despise black people?

 

[ClosedCaption]

they are when they re-elect said politician DESPITE said politicians actions during the first term.

No, I thought the right was all about personal responsibility. Now you're trying to sell me that I am responsible for the actions of people I vote for too?

Uh no..

lol...of course not. "not my fault I voted for the guy...and again...and again. Sure, the guy sucked every term, but not my fault. I simply voted for him"

You come across more and more like a child with every post I read of yours.

Didnt know that when some pol does something stupid its my fault for not being able to predict the future. Good to know