Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again
quite obvious what your insinuation was, winger
You did not read the article. So therefore you assume I'm assuming without any evidence. However, there is plenty of evidence to see that the main opposition guy is a Republican and his opponents are Republicans. The guy is essentially Democrat.
Join the rest of us in reality.
Join the rest of us in reality... your first statement was about 'republicans' and conservatives as a group... and you assumed... not a fringe group... nice attempt to deflect away from your initial insinuation though
Where else but North Carolina
So why he is likely a Democrat? Because he's black? Nice Job RGS!
The Bass is a African American and a Republican. Guess that destroys your theory.![]()
Maybe you should pay more attention to what you post? You know, actually read it with some level of reading comprehension and intelligence.
Go ahead provide us a link to all the heads of NAACP chapters that are Republican. The Congressional Black Caucus is on record for expelling the only black Republican that was a member. I seriously doubt the NAACP would support a Republican.
The NAACP isn't a political organization.
Worse, he not only doesn't believe in God, but he also doesn't believe in angels, demons, devils, holy ghosts, friendly ghosts, fairies, leprechauns, ogres, witches, astrology, sorcerers, magic or the supernatural. What kind of man IS he?
The next thing you know, they will be telling us the Grand Canyon WASN'T formed by Noah's Flood.
FOXNews.com - Lawsuit Threatened if Atheist North Carolina Councilman Gets Sworn In
Well, in the end, the Atheist will win. Meanwhile, Republicans will still continue to be stuck in 1868. I do wonder what is so Conservative about denying people who do not believe in a God a right to hold office anyway.
Talk about a stinker legal case. This one has "establishment clause" written all over it. If it accomplishes anything, it will just lead to the archaic state law being chucked.
"No religious litmus test" means just that.
I think there was a Supreme Court case vs the state of Maryland in the 1960s that pretty much reaffirmed that a religious test for government employment is unConstitutional.
Talk about a stinker legal case. This one has "establishment clause" written all over it. If it accomplishes anything, it will just lead to the archaic state law being chucked.
"No religious litmus test" means just that.
I think there was a Supreme Court case vs the state of Maryland in the 1960s that pretty much reaffirmed that a religious test for government employment is unConstitutional.
Correct and it is interpreted to be addressed in the 1st Amendment.