Supreme Court Takes up Fourteenth Amendment Challenge to Trump's Candidacy

[rampart]

You are talking five people dude. FIVE. Get an actual argument. Its been long enough.

i named 5. would you like to add hawley, taylor green, jordan, brooks, tubberville and the other traitors?

 

[rampart]

Nobody tried to "overthrow" the government, that's just idiotic.

the plan was idiotic, but that does not mean flynn (with lindell and rfk jr) isn't out recruiting and training "proud boys " for their next putsch..

 

[Independentthinker]

Their Decision is expected by October 9. Let's dispense with these Democrat's nonsense once and for all.

Supreme Court to Take up First Fourteenth Amendment Challenge to Trump's Candidacy​

"The US Supreme Court is poised to take up the issue of whether the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution bars former president Trump from running for president in 2024. The case originates with alleged GOP write-in candidate John Anthony Castro of Texas. So far, he's filed lawsuits challenging Trump's eligibility for office in eight states: Wyoming, Utah, Oklahoma, North Carolina, West Virginia, Montana, Kansas, and Idaho. A lawsuit by Castro in Florida has already been dismissed.

Castro's lawsuit is a long shot. The bar he has to cross is to prove he is personally injured by Trump's candidacy. He hopes to clear that hurdle by claiming that his candidacy is damaged by Trump's presence "based on a political competitive injury in the form a diminution of votes."

Newsweek says we should have the Supreme Court's decision in about a month."

Supreme Court to Take up First Fourteenth Amendment Challenge to Trump's Candidacy

Really, it should have never really gotten out of the gate in the first place. Even state Democratic leaders have said it is nonsense. The Supreme Court shouldn't have to rule every time someone has a wet dream.

 

[TNHarley]

i named 5. would you like to add hawley, taylor green, jordan, brooks, tubberville and the other traitors?

People that got charged with something major. 5 people. Get a valid argument

 

[Independentthinker]

How many insurrection convictions you got?
More people might take you seriously about this issue if all you people didnt use hyperbole as your argument.

The left says they don't need Trump to be found guilty to keep him off the ballot.

 

[TNHarley]

The left says they don't need Trump to be found guilty to keep him off the ballot.

You are talking about a collective of complete stupidity. So that isnt surprising.

 

[Independentthinker]

oh sorry. that 22 year sentence was for "seditious conspiracy" to overthrow an election .

if tarrio (and his co conspirators, bannon, stone, flynn, and lindell, and over 100 congresscritters) had been successful, who would now be president?

What does that have to do with Trump?

 

[rampart]

The left says they don't need Trump to be found guilty to keep him off the ballot.

again, thinker, all of these 14th amendment proposals are coming from repub officials in red states. where are these democrats in your post?

 

[surada]

Their Decision is expected by October 9. Let's dispense with these Democrat's nonsense once and for all.

Supreme Court to Take up First Fourteenth Amendment Challenge to Trump's Candidacy​

"The US Supreme Court is poised to take up the issue of whether the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution bars former president Trump from running for president in 2024. The case originates with alleged GOP write-in candidate John Anthony Castro of Texas. So far, he's filed lawsuits challenging Trump's eligibility for office in eight states: Wyoming, Utah, Oklahoma, North Carolina, West Virginia, Montana, Kansas, and Idaho. A lawsuit by Castro in Florida has already been dismissed.

Castro's lawsuit is a long shot. The bar he has to cross is to prove he is personally injured by Trump's candidacy. He hopes to clear that hurdle by claiming that his candidacy is damaged by Trump's presence "based on a political competitive injury in the form a diminution of votes."

Newsweek says we should have the Supreme Court's decision in about a month."

Supreme Court to Take up First Fourteenth Amendment Challenge to Trump's Candidacy

Great. The US Supreme Court upholds and defends the US Constitution.. Trump took an oath to do the same.

 

[rampart]

What does that have to do with Trump?

were you at the dec 23 white house meeting? trump was.

 

[JGalt]

Great. The US Supreme Court upholds and defends the US Constitution.. Trump took an oath to do the same.

I not sure if you understand what the SC is going to rule on. They're going to decide whether or not secretaries of state can kick Trump off the ballot or not.

 

[Faun]

The left says they don't need Trump to be found guilty to keep him off the ballot.

Of what do you think Trump needs to be found guilty for states to keep him off their ballots based on the 14th Amendment?

 

[Dekster]

Meaningless because Castro has no standing.

When a State Secretary of State takes up the case in a BLUE state, then the issue will be more relevant.

If the SCOTUS could invent the standing in the student loan forgiveness case, it can do it here as well. They have become very opportunistic like that.

 

[Faun]

What does that have to do with Trump?

Tarrio was the leader of the Proud Boys.

"Proud Boys, stand back and stand by," somebody’s got to do something about antifa and the left ~ Donald Trump

They followed their orders.

 

[JoeB131]

Of course, because everyone knows how those blue state folks like to disregard the US Constitution and Supreme Court decisions. That's how they got "blue" in the first place.

More like, we don't have inbred idiots like the Red States who vote against their own economic interests because of their racial, religious, and sexual fears.

 

[JoeB131]

If the SCOTUS could invent the standing in the student loan forgiveness case, it can do it here as well. They have become very opportunistic like that.

Maybe... or maybe they realize that Trump isn't worth the precendents he's setting.

Once you've declared it's okay to attack an institution of government for making decisions you don't like, SCOTUS could find itself hanging from the bra-straps of angry Feminists

 

[jbrownson0831]

castro is a repub. the states where this is an issue are all red states. please change your first paragraph tp remove the word "democrats," unless you can connect this to a non republican party.

i think trump can win this in the supreme court with an "original intent" argument that the 14th applies to confederates only.

arguing that jan 6 was not an insurrection is really not working with most people, and might end up 7-2 against dear leader. .

on edit, the states involved are all red states. texas and florida also
Wyoming, Utah, Oklahoma, North Carolina, West Virginia, Montana, Kansas, and Idaho.

Waah waah waah.....American flags and baby carriage crowd is not an insurrection bo matter the opinion of the Reich.