The Fundamental Dishonesty of "REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS".

[Robert W]

That will no doubt be a cornerstone of Kamala's campaign. And it is of course a complete misrepresentation of ABORTION RIGHTS. In fact, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS are the exact opposite of ABORTION RIGHTS. Furthermore, no one in the Republican Party has EVER threatened women's rights to reproduce. Has there ever been any legislation about forced tubal ligations? NO. Anything about forced contraception? NO. Forced abstinence? NO.

Whenever you hear Kamala proclaiming REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ARE UNDER ATTACK feel free to laugh because it is truly a joke.

They believe very much the mother has the right to hire a killer to kill her own child.

 

[Robert W]

You have a perception problem .........why should a minority of the population control the majority?

After all it is the semen that is the problem not the women.

Why should any number control other humans? In the case of the woman, to prevent her having her child murdered by a doctor.

 

[progressive hunter]

.

If you have the stomach for it, here's the book that I couldn't bring myself to read. It's about a group of warriors who rescue aborted babies from clinic dumpsters, in order to give them respectful Christian burials.

View attachment 985213

thanks but I will pass,,, I have seen enough pictures for a lifetime of fighting against abortion except for the most serious of cases

 

[boevans]

The process in #14 is not the issue.

The issues aere #1, a fetus is not human, and #2, this should be the woman's choice not the state.

 

[boevans]

Why should any number control other humans? In the case of the woman, to prevent her having her child murdered by a doctor.

Abortion is a medical term.

Murder is a legal term.

 

[MarathonMike]

There is a fundamental dishonesty in attacking reproductive rights.

The Democrats have successfully gaslighted you. I am simply pointing out how dishonest the Democrats are in cloaking fetal termination with the flowery and COMPLETELY inaccurate term "Reproductive Rights". As I stated, no one is limiting a woman's right to REPRODUCE in any way, shape or form.

 

[Robert W]

Abortion is a medical term.

Murder is a legal term.

Death is both.

 

[Robert W]

The Democrats have successfully gaslighted you. I am simply pointing out how dishonest the Democrats are in cloaking fetal termination with the flowery and COMPLETELY inaccurate term "Reproductive Rights". As I stated, no one is limiting a woman's right to REPRODUCE in any way, shape or form.

No law I am aware of stops women from getting pregnant.

 

[MarathonMike]

The process in #14 is not the issue.

The issues aere #1, a fetus is not human, and #2, this should be the woman's choice not the state.

A fetus is not human? WOW. That's what you are going with? What is it, a mouse? A tumor? Please elaborate.

 

[progressive hunter]

Abortion is a medical term.

Murder is a legal term.

I know I put you on ignore for a good reason,,


youre a fucking idiot,,

murder is the act of killing someone for no reason,, "UNJUSTIFIED" and it was made illegal,,

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

thanks but I will pass,,, I have seen enough pictures for a lifetime of fighting against abortion except for the most serious of cases

.

Thank you for fighting for the unborn!

.

 

[irosie91]

just more proof you need to buy a dictionary and read a medical journal on the subject,,

or are you to retarded to know what those things are,,

On what subject?----the FACT that a large number of conceptions DON'T MAKE IT? something like 30 % the FACT was demonstrated and published when I was an under-grad---more than 50 years ago. How many medical journals have you read
"on the subject"?

 

[progressive hunter]

.

Thank you for fighting for the unborn!

.

ditto,,

 

[progressive hunter]

On what subject?----the FACT that a large number of conceptions DON'T MAKE IT? something like 30 % the FACT was demonstrated and published when I was an under-grad---more than 50 years ago. How many medical journals have you read
"on the subject"?

natural deaths have nothing to do with the intentional killing of a human child in the womb,,

so please stop using that excuse to make yourself feel better about the horrible thing you support,,

 

[irosie91]

natural deaths have nothing to do with the intentional killing of a human child in the womb,,

so please stop using that excuse to make yourself feel better about the horrible thing you support,,

you are sick and clueless and very rude. The issue of abortion has nothing to do with the fact that you shit and spit on people who quote real stats. How many times have you been pregnant?

 

[progressive hunter]

you are sick and clueless and very rude. The issue of abortion has nothing to do with the fact that you shit and spit on people who quote real stats. How many times have you been pregnant?

I have two living children and would have three if I wasnt young and dumb and tricked into allowing a doctor to kill our first child,,


and your stat of failed pregnancies due to natural deaths has nothing to do with abortion which is the intentional killing of an innocent child in the womb,,

you using that stat is what people that dont value life tell themselves so they can sleep beer at night knowing they are supporting the killing of innocent children,,

 

[MarathonMike]

They believe very much the mother has the right to hire a killer to kill her own child.

But it's ok, they are knocked out and never see it. As the hardcore abortionists like to say, it's akin to tumor removal.

 

[irosie91]

I have two living children and would have three if I wasnt young and dumb and tricked into allowing a doctor to kill our first child,,


and your stat of failed pregnancies due to natural deaths has nothing to do with abortion which is the intentional killing of an innocent child in the womb,,

you using that stat is what people that dont value life tell themselves so they can sleep beer at night knowing they are supporting the killing of innocent children,,

You are beyond DISGUSTING----(which is how I also describe
beer) I do not believe that a DOCTOR talked you into aborting
a normal pregnancy or even a slightly risky one or FORCED
it on you----that is what nuts who want to MAKE A CASE--
say. Doing so is contrary to medical ethics----you had to
GIVE CONSENT. I am familiar with people who make such
claims.

 

[progressive hunter]

You are beyond DISGUSTING----(which is how I also describe
beer) I do not believe that a DOCTOR talked you into aborting
a normal pregnancy or even a slightly risky one or FORCED
it on you----that is what nuts who want to MAKE A CASE--
say. Doing so is contrary to medical ethics----you had to
GIVE CONSENT. I am familiar with people who make such
claims.
to medical ethics

youre the one trying to justify murdering an innocent child,, so your rant means nothing to me,,

 

[Toro]

That will no doubt be a cornerstone of Kamala's campaign. And it is of course a complete misrepresentation of ABORTION RIGHTS. In fact, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS are the exact opposite of ABORTION RIGHTS. Furthermore, no one in the Republican Party has EVER threatened women's rights to reproduce. Has there ever been any legislation about forced tubal ligations? NO. Anything about forced contraception? NO. Forced abstinence? NO.

Whenever you hear Kamala proclaiming REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ARE UNDER ATTACK feel free to laugh because it is truly a joke.

Yes. Doing nothing will be an effective strategy.