Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There’s a huge difference between campaign contributions and handing money over for personal use.
Not the issue. And state laws apparently DIDNT handle this.
Conservative justices gutted campaign finance laws so we are twice as fucked because of you losers.
This guy included or was caught including his son in an inside trade deal... that is still illegal in congress... if he had just acted on his own he would not have been charged...
Trump pardons ex-U.S. Rep. Chris Collins, busted for insider trading
President Trump pardoned disgraced former Rep. Chris Collins late Tuesday, granting a reprieve to the upstate New York politician who was forced from Congress after he was caught on camera phoning …nypost.com
You assholes are always complaining about government corruption yet here you are defending SCOTUS as they bend over backwards to excuse it.No, there really isn't. Especially when the campaigns pay out the people on the campaign. More graft.
Then re-write the State law, don't federalize everything.
Because the laws only wanted to restrict spending one side didn't like. Either ban everyone or ban no one.
Don't try to ban corporations but let unions and lefty "non profits" continue to contribute as they want.
Triggered?....You assholes are always complaining about government corruption yet here you are defending SCOTUS as they bend over backwards to excuse it.
Go fuck yourselves. This is just another partisan bullshit fight that you’re only making because you chose a team.
That’s a lie.This guy included or was caught including his son in an inside trade deal... that is still illegal in congress... if he had just acted on his own he would not have been charged...
Of course not.Can you expect a fair ruling from a court when the judge knows he will receive gifts, and all he has to do is rule in favor of what ever the gift giver wants?
You assholes are always complaining about government corruption yet here you are defending SCOTUS as they bend over backwards to excuse it.
Go fuck yourselves. This is just another partisan bullshit fight that you’re only making because you chose a team.
So you don’t worry about politicians getting $13k checks from companies that got taxpayer money because of them?We worry about government political corruption as used to crush one's "enemies, like the J6 overreach, and the FBI's seeming major concern over Catholics attending Latin Masses vs. the Large amount of vocal pissed of Muslims we have.
Meanwhile we kicked out Santos from congress, but Mendez still has his seat. Why?
So you don’t worry about politicians getting $13k checks from companies that got taxpayer money because of them?
Or maybe you don’t worry about it when it’s not something you can use to attack Biden.
Can’t limit campaign contributions because conservative justices say that contributions are equivalent to speech.They get far more from anyone and we love it because it's a campaign contribution. Fix the law, that's all the Court has said. Congress can try again and be more specific, or they can do the right thing and let the State handle it.
And I noticed you ignored my point on Santos vis a vis Mendez. Why won't the dems expel him? he's going to trial!
Can’t limit campaign contributions because conservative justices say that contributions are equivalent to speech.
There’s no reason to fix the law because there’s nothing wrong with the law. The problem is SCOTUS justices who don’t like the law so they invented a reason to ignore it.
I guess this decision in favor of the Biden admin is also corrupt?
Supreme Court rules on challenge to Biden admin's effort to influence social media
The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of the Biden administration in a challenge to its alleged coordination with social media companies.www.foxnews.com
Campaign finance law is totally unrelated.You can if you limit it to one value FOR EVERYONE. Once you set limits based on who or what gives them, then you get into content based restrictions and first amendment issues.
The problem is both sides only want the other one silenced, but more so with the left wanting to silence the right.
Well 6 of em said fix it, and 3 said don't, so the 6 beat the 3.
Fix it.
Campaign finance law is totally unrelated.
And your interpretation of Citizens United is wrong. You can’t limit any Americans contributing to PACs at all.
This decision is about conservative justices finding a way to change the law they don’t like for political reasons. Not legal reasons.
According to whom?
Money for the campaign is different than money going in someone's bank account. Even a political hack like you would be able to see the difference. Especially after your favorite justices decided that donating to PACs is equivalent to free speech. Handing a check over to a politician because they helped your company sure as hell isn't free speech.If you think that you are gullible as well as stupid. It's all about money going from X to Y.
Because you can't stop people from talking about an election just because you disagree with them and they have money.
No, that was Chevron, Plessey, Roe, Obergfell and other "progressive decisions" that were based on political desires and bullshit.
And Chevron is the next one to get fucked over, and rightly so.
Money for the campaign is different than money going in someone's bank account. Even a political hack like you would be able to see the difference. Especially after your favorite justices decided that donating to PACs is equivalent to free speech. Handing a check over to a politician because they helped your company sure as hell isn't free speech.
Because there’s a lot of laws about how campaign funds can be used and how private funds can be used including disclosures where people can and are prosecuted for breaking.Is it really? It's a different account, but weren't you the idiot talking about taxes and a forgiven loan being fungible, or does that not apply here?
Because there’s a lot of laws about how campaign funds can be used and how private funds can be used including disclosures where people can and are prosecuted for breaking.
It’s not fungible at all.
