Blackrook
Diamond Member
- Jun 20, 2014
- 21,339
- 11,042
I watch a lot of movies, and I think it's quite remarkable that the characters in these movies are far more often white than the real life population of America.
Hispanics and Asians might as well not even exist. A Hispanic might be cast as a maid or gardener, but otherwise, no. Asians might get a role as the "non-sexual" friend, in fact casting an Asian in a role guarantees that he will not be a love interest to the white character. It's really racist how this happens, because real Asians do have sex.
Blacks are the minority that get the best treatment because they are more organized. But most will be cast in supporting roles, not as main characters. There are a few exceptions, but not many.
The homosexuals have made inroads so that every movie must have at least one or two token homosexuals, usually cast as the "gay best friend" for the female lead. This person will never have real character development, just a simple side story that has no impact on the main plot.
Now the transgenders are also getting token characters, but like other non-white, non-straights, they almost never have a leading role.
I think the situation is quite hilarious, proving that Hollywood greed overwhelms Hollywood liberalism every time.
The thinking of Hollywood studio execs is that movies about non-whites, non-straights are niche audience movies, not a movie for everyone, and therefore, less profitable.
Hispanics and Asians might as well not even exist. A Hispanic might be cast as a maid or gardener, but otherwise, no. Asians might get a role as the "non-sexual" friend, in fact casting an Asian in a role guarantees that he will not be a love interest to the white character. It's really racist how this happens, because real Asians do have sex.
Blacks are the minority that get the best treatment because they are more organized. But most will be cast in supporting roles, not as main characters. There are a few exceptions, but not many.
The homosexuals have made inroads so that every movie must have at least one or two token homosexuals, usually cast as the "gay best friend" for the female lead. This person will never have real character development, just a simple side story that has no impact on the main plot.
Now the transgenders are also getting token characters, but like other non-white, non-straights, they almost never have a leading role.
I think the situation is quite hilarious, proving that Hollywood greed overwhelms Hollywood liberalism every time.
The thinking of Hollywood studio execs is that movies about non-whites, non-straights are niche audience movies, not a movie for everyone, and therefore, less profitable.