- Apr 21, 2010
- 98,559
- 59,731
So we attack and ridicule the people doing the research? Seems to me people don't want an answer if it might offend their ideology. I'd say it is analogous to those who don't believe in evolution because it contradicts the literal interpretation of the Bible.The part I dispute is the rate of change argument. Specifically that there is no other known precedent from the past. Why? Because there isn't that kind of resolution in the data.
It seems to me to be a disingenuous argument.
I will attack anyone who demands that an opposing voice be silenced. The only people who demand that no other voice be heard are those who have no legitimate argument. The ONLY people demanding that no debate be heard are the AGW pushers.