Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can ayone explain where there is one iota of logic in this rant??
This rant is completely delusional......
Freedom of the press? Freedom of Speech? Where have I ever posted anything questioning those values? How can.....property of the ownership of that press can be stripped from those owners to satisfy the NEEDS of those who are suffering a DECLINING LIFE STYLE.... be stripped away?
You are completely nuts here
ROFLMNAO... Friends the entire discussion is directly above...
And that's the beautiful thing about Text forums... The record is crystal clear... and readily available for ALL to see...
What ya have here is the delusion wherein the common leftist comes to advocate against the natural American right to private property... through the pedestrian leftist assertion that a NEED is all it takes to rightfully usurp the property of another to fulfill that need.
Only to beSHOCKED!
to learn that ANYONE could take them to believe that they're against the the unalienable human right to the unfettered use of the product of one's labor.
And therein... lies... the lie.
What you witnessed in the above discussion was the utter evisceration of a typical 'Centrist'... the complete anihilation of the would-be principles of leftism where such is demonstrated to be little more than a fatally flawed circular species of reasoing; reasoning possessed and advocated by those who are wholly ignorant of that flaw... and this born from their simple inability to develope intellectually sound, logically valid reason.
They're idiots and it's just no more complex.... that that.
Well that is simply not true... as she advanced precisely the opposite, in another thread, in the same HOUR... To wit:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/87897-unacceptable-redistribution-of-wealth.html#post1507512
![]()
![]()
![]()
DELUSION PERSONIFIED!
Notice how the premise here, requires that 'the wealth' belongs to those from whom the Rich 'took it'... OKA: The Poor. Which is left-speak for: "The People..."
Thus the premise requires that 'the Wealth' does NOT belong to those who earned it... it is NOT THE PROPERTY OF THOSE WHO LABORED FOR IT... NO no... 'the wealth' belongs to the ethereal collective... and what's more 'the wealth' was taken from them, by cutting the tax liability to the RICH... which requires, for one to come to THAT conclusion; that Taxation is the means by which the Poor get BACK, the money that the rich steal from them...
Same with tax shelters... these are legal instruments which HIDE money stolen from the poor, BY those who stole it... to prevent the poor from getting their money back...
Again the money is the PROPERTY of 'the ethereal 'People'... NOT the SPECIFIC individuals that earned it.
But the last one is the cutest... Americans understand that valid and sustainable rights can only exist on the responsibilties which are intrinsic in those rights...
3. Reinstate workforce protections
Protections... for workers... protections which workers need because the Worker... read: "the poor" have conceded their reponsibility for their protection to the State...
Now we're to believe that the Worker is ENTITLED to all the money... that the money BELONGS TO THE WORKER... and that the WORKER NEEDS PROTECTIONS TO KEEP THAT MONEY WHICH BELONGS TO THEM FROM BEING STOLEN FROM THEM...
The Money is RIGHTFULLY OWNED BY THE WORKER... who has absolutely NO RESPONSIBILITY for any sustaining facet of that right...
This gal is TYPICAL of the Advocates of CHANGE! She's not some dimwitted exception to the rule.... SHE IS THE RULE...
These people have no understanding of what human rights EVEN ARE... they've absolutely NO IDEA of what the US IS, how it was founded, who the people that started it were, or what they believed... this person is an abyss of abject ignorance...
YET SHE IS ALLOWED TO VOTE!
Now I ask you... HOW LONG CAN A CULTURE THAT ALLOWS THIS LEVEL OF IGNORANCE... POSSIBLY SUSTAIN ITSELF, WHEN PEOPLE LIKE THIS ARE GIVEN THE MEANS TO ELECT OTHER PEOPLE TO THE LEADERSHIP OF THAT CULTURE?
The answer is: Not long...
It's time we began to discuss the unenviable work of what needs to be done to stop the intellectuall hemorrhaging... and set the nation back on it's tracks... by requiring a minimal understanding of what America is and an unambiguous pledge of loyalty to that concept, before ANYONE is allowed to cast a vote for anything... except the addled-minded nonsense of who stays on the island and what team of celebrities danced best...
What a rambling discourse on nothing
Can someone please make sense of this and put it into English?
The best sign from today's DC protest...
![]()
What's the issue you have with this well reasoned sentiment? And please... be as specific as your intellectual limitations allow...
Granted that doesn't leave much room... but with a fair effort, I really believe that you can pull this one off...
First....what the hell is Obamacare, anyway? And please be specific. Additionally, why use the "with Kennedy" at all? Kennedy was a great American servant and he JUST passed away. What is the purpose of using his name on this sign?
That sign is quite psychopathic, don't you think? How old is that girl? 14? Some people should not be allowed to have children. She probably has no idea what that means. That's like the Phelps gang and their toddlers carrying "God hates fags" signs.
ROFLMNAO... Friends the entire discussion is directly above...
And that's the beautiful thing about Text forums... The record is crystal clear... and readily available for ALL to see...
What ya have here is the delusion wherein the common leftist comes to advocate against the natural American right to private property... through the pedestrian leftist assertion that a NEED is all it takes to rightfully usurp the property of another to fulfill that need.
Only to beSHOCKED!
to learn that ANYONE could take them to believe that they're against the the unalienable human right to the unfettered use of the product of one's labor.
And therein... lies... the lie.
What you witnessed in the above discussion was the utter evisceration of a typical 'Centrist'... the complete anihilation of the would-be principles of leftism where such is demonstrated to be little more than a fatally flawed circular species of reasoing; reasoning possessed and advocated by those who are wholly ignorant of that flaw... and this born from their simple inability to develope intellectually sound, logically valid reason.
They're idiots and it's just no more complex.... that that.
Well that is simply not true... as she advanced precisely the opposite, in another thread, in the same HOUR... To wit:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/87897-unacceptable-redistribution-of-wealth.html#post1507512
![]()
![]()
![]()
DELUSION PERSONIFIED!
Notice how the premise here, requires that 'the wealth' belongs to those from whom the Rich 'took it'... OKA: The Poor. Which is left-speak for: "The People..."
Thus the premise requires that 'the Wealth' does NOT belong to those who earned it... it is NOT THE PROPERTY OF THOSE WHO LABORED FOR IT... NO no... 'the wealth' belongs to the ethereal collective... and what's more 'the wealth' was taken from them, by cutting the tax liability to the RICH... which requires, for one to come to THAT conclusion; that Taxation is the means by which the Poor get BACK, the money that the rich steal from them...
Same with tax shelters... these are legal instruments which HIDE money stolen from the poor, BY those who stole it... to prevent the poor from getting their money back...
Again the money is the PROPERTY of 'the ethereal 'People'... NOT the SPECIFIC individuals that earned it.
But the last one is the cutest... Americans understand that valid and sustainable rights can only exist on the responsibilties which are intrinsic in those rights...
Protections... for workers... protections which workers need because the Worker... read: "the poor" have conceded their reponsibility for their protection to the State...
Now we're to believe that the Worker is ENTITLED to all the money... that the money BELONGS TO THE WORKER... and that the WORKER NEEDS PROTECTIONS TO KEEP THAT MONEY WHICH BELONGS TO THEM FROM BEING STOLEN FROM THEM...
The Money is RIGHTFULLY OWNED BY THE WORKER... who has absolutely NO RESPONSIBILITY for any sustaining facet of that right...
This gal is TYPICAL of the Advocates of CHANGE! She's not some dimwitted exception to the rule.... SHE IS THE RULE...
These people have no understanding of what human rights EVEN ARE... they've absolutely NO IDEA of what the US IS, how it was founded, who the people that started it were, or what they believed... this person is an abyss of abject ignorance...
YET SHE IS ALLOWED TO VOTE!
Now I ask you... HOW LONG CAN A CULTURE THAT ALLOWS THIS LEVEL OF IGNORANCE... POSSIBLY SUSTAIN ITSELF, WHEN PEOPLE LIKE THIS ARE GIVEN THE MEANS TO ELECT OTHER PEOPLE TO THE LEADERSHIP OF THAT CULTURE?
The answer is: Not long...
It's time we began to discuss the unenviable work of what needs to be done to stop the intellectuall hemorrhaging... and set the nation back on it's tracks... by requiring a minimal understanding of what America is and an unambiguous pledge of loyalty to that concept, before ANYONE is allowed to cast a vote for anything... except the addled-minded nonsense of who stays on the island and what team of celebrities danced best...
What a rambling discourse on nothing
Can someone please make sense of this and put it into English?
ROFLMNAO... and the defense grows less and less adament... weaker in spirit and content as any hope of successfully advocating for anti-Americanism becomes less likely in the face of unapologetic, irrepresible American common sense.
She would have preferred to have just left this alone... but she couldn't muster the discipline... feeling compelled to say something... ANYTHING... which inevitably leads to that most humiliating of all wimpish retorts... the patented Leftist: NUH UH! Defense...
ROFL...
Loser... I want you to know that I believe in giving credit where credit is due... and Sis... It's clear to me, as I am sure it is to the other objective members of this board; that you're doing the very BEST you CAN... God bless your ignorant ass and your inability to prevent yourself from humiliating yourself through the constant advocacy of principle-less, diametrically oppossing points of view... OKA: Left-think.
First....what the hell is Obamacare, anyway? And please be specific. Additionally, why use the "with Kennedy" at all? Kennedy was a great American servant and he JUST passed away. What is the purpose of using his name on this sign?
That sign is quite psychopathic, don't you think?
No... I don't see the sign demonstrating somebody affected with a personality disorder marked by aggressive, violent, antisocial thought and behavior and a lack of remorse or empathy ... I see a sign which declares the unapologetic rejection of Socializing 1/6th of the US Economy and in so doing destroying the best healthcare system on earth, so that the lowest common denominator in the US Culture can feel better about their sorry lot... and suggests that this subversive legislation should be buried with Ted Kennedy, who was himself a life-long subversive; along with being a murderer and a general reprobate and degenerate.
How ya get psychopathic out of that is known only to you.
How old is that girl? 14? Some people should not be allowed to have children. She probably has no idea what that means. That's like the Phelps gang and their toddlers carrying "God hates fags" signs.
I'd wager that the little girl holding that sign could give you a lesson on the issue...
What's the issue you have with this well reasoned sentiment? And please... be as specific as your intellectual limitations allow...
Granted that doesn't leave much room... but with a fair effort, I really believe that you can pull this one off...
First....what the hell is Obamacare, anyway? And please be specific. Additionally, why use the "with Kennedy" at all? Kennedy was a great American servant and he JUST passed away. What is the purpose of using his name on this sign?
That sign is quite psychopathic, don't you think? How old is that girl? 14? Some people should not be allowed to have children. She probably has no idea what that means. That's like the Phelps gang and their toddlers carrying "God hates fags" signs.
First....what the hell is Obamacare, anyway? And please be specific. Additionally, why use the "with Kennedy" at all? Kennedy was a great American servant and he JUST passed away. What is the purpose of using his name on this sign?
That sign is quite psychopathic, don't you think? How old is that girl? 14? Some people should not be allowed to have children. She probably has no idea what that means. That's like the Phelps gang and their toddlers carrying "God hates fags" signs.
stfu you ignorant pile
Instead of calling others "dumb fuck", "moron" or "morans" as do rag dude proclaimed, "idiot"...trying listening to their concerns. Resorting to name calling makes you look like a "dumb fuck", in everyone's eyes.
And it is an incontrovertible FACT that the BOY King was born to a Muslim Father, thus is a Muslim; and that the blue-lipped POS is a Marxist, thus a LEFTIST and Sis...
I thought this was America, and according to the first Ammendment YOU get to choose your religion not your father
Once again Publius shows his disdain for the US Constitution
What a rambling discourse on nothing
Can someone please make sense of this and put it into English?
ROFLMNAO... and the defense grows less and less adament... weaker in spirit and content as any hope of successfully advocating for anti-Americanism becomes less likely in the face of unapologetic, irrepresible American common sense.
She would have preferred to have just left this alone... but she couldn't muster the discipline... feeling compelled to say something... ANYTHING... which inevitably leads to that most humiliating of all wimpish retorts... the patented Leftist: NUH UH! Defense...
ROFL...
Loser... I want you to know that I believe in giving credit where credit is due... and Sis... It's clear to me, as I am sure it is to the other objective members of this board; that you're doing the very BEST you CAN... God bless your ignorant ass and your inability to prevent yourself from humiliating yourself through the constant advocacy of principle-less, diametrically oppossing points of view... OKA: Left-think.
Publius....notice how much scrolling you make people do just to get through your diatribe??
That is what makes the English language so great. You are able to be concise in your reasoning rather than force the reader to go through an enless rant to try to figure out what the hell you are whining about.
ROFLMNAO... and the defense grows less and less adament... weaker in spirit and content as any hope of successfully advocating for anti-Americanism becomes less likely in the face of unapologetic, irrepresible American common sense.
She would have preferred to have just left this alone... but she couldn't muster the discipline... feeling compelled to say something... ANYTHING... which inevitably leads to that most humiliating of all wimpish retorts... the patented Leftist: NUH UH! Defense...
ROFL...
Loser... I want you to know that I believe in giving credit where credit is due... and Sis... It's clear to me, as I am sure it is to the other objective members of this board; that you're doing the very BEST you CAN... God bless your ignorant ass and your inability to prevent yourself from humiliating yourself through the constant advocacy of principle-less, diametrically oppossing points of view... OKA: Left-think.
Publius....notice how much scrolling you make people do just to get through your diatribe??
That is what makes the English language so great. You are able to be concise in your reasoning rather than force the reader to go through an enless rant to try to figure out what the hell you are whining about.
Well concision is readily subject to misrepresentation...
Depth, tends to overwhelm such likelihood... as this instance verifies... In this case... you've exposed yourself as a n unbridled fool... and any objective reading of the record will simply confirm that.
Publius....notice how much scrolling you make people do just to get through your diatribe??
That is what makes the English language so great. You are able to be concise in your reasoning rather than force the reader to go through an enless rant to try to figure out what the hell you are whining about.
Well concision is readily subject to misrepresentation...
Depth, tends to overwhelm such likelihood... as this instance verifies... In this case... you've exposed yourself as a n unbridled fool... and any objective reading of the record will simply confirm that.
You confuse rambling with depth. Notice how nobody is picking up your clarion call....you bore them to death........get to the point
Well concision is readily subject to misrepresentation...
Depth, tends to overwhelm such likelihood... as this instance verifies... In this case... you've exposed yourself as a n unbridled fool... and any objective reading of the record will simply confirm that.
You confuse rambling with depth. Notice how nobody is picking up your clarion call....you bore them to death........get to the point
Hey shit-for-brains... you conceded the debate four posts back...
Now that means that there's no reason for you to try and change the subject.
U n d e r s t a n d ?
Y o u - l o s t !
Instead of calling others "dumb fuck", "moron" or "morans" as do rag dude proclaimed, "idiot"...trying listening to their concerns. Resorting to name calling makes you look like a "dumb fuck", in everyone's eyes.
First... I want to thank you for your words...
Second, I hear you saying that you feel that I should listen to others... instead of denigrating them through derogatory epithets or... "lables...'
Third, I don't 'call' or 'lable' anyone... anything... I merely relate to them the lable which they have, identified themselves as, through their words...
Now here's the thing... Idiocy happens... and it happens most consistantly in those who advocate for the ideological left.
For instance, CNN is presently 'reporting' that 60% of those polled 'say that the President did not LIE in his speech to the congress...' Which is nothing if not incontrobvertible FACT that 60% of those polled are idiots...
The incontrovertible fact is that Illegal immigrants are entitled to receive medical treatment as are all human beings... that the left; specifically the President wants to project that medical treatment for "ILLEGAL ALIENS WILL NOT BE PROVIDED MEDICAL TREATMENT FUNDED BY THIS BILL" is a damnable lie... as the President is KNOWINGLY portraying THIS BILL AS A COMPLETE RE-CONSTRUCTION OF THE US MEDICAL SYSTEM... while DEMONSTRATING THAT THE SYSTEM REMAINS SUBJECTED TO THE UNENDING, EVER ESCALATING VOLUME OF HUMAN NEED... and simply ADDS EXPENSE TO INJURY...
The President is therefore letting the Americans know that HE BELIEVES THAT AMERICANS ARE IDIOTS...
And that is a HUGE mistake... one which is typical to the common leftists.
My vote goes to:
"Nearly two million attend protests in DC"
Now that was a hoot!
You're an idiot...
Care to explain, dumbass?
You confuse rambling with depth. Notice how nobody is picking up your clarion call....you bore them to death........get to the point
Hey shit-for-brains... you conceded the debate four posts back...
Now that means that there's no reason for you to try and change the subject.
U n d e r s t a n d ?
Y o u - l o s t !
Your not in my league,
You confuse rambling with depth. Notice how nobody is picking up your clarion call....you bore them to death........get to the point
Hey shit-for-brains... you conceded the debate four posts back...
Now that means that there's no reason for you to try and change the subject.
U n d e r s t a n d ?
Y o u - l o s t !
Self proclaimed victories have no merit
Your not in my league, ...
... Just save me the pointless rants and write in real english. Its not hard....they teach it in all the schools