Maddow Blasts Fox from her Glass House at MSNBC

[Bfgrn]

If johnny dollar's place says it, it must be Pulitzer prize journalism

 

[Kat]

Hardly.

Lying requires prior knowledge.

Ohhh you are saying she is stupid then.

Why don't you watch her show sometime?

You might learn something.

The people at FoxLies know they are lying, except maybe for Michelle Malkin who is just bat shit crazy.

How do you know I haven't?

 

[Oddball]

Hardly.

Lying requires prior knowledge.

Which means that you lie here on a daily basis.

And your posts are nothing but moronic insults.

And your posts are nothing but moronic.

What else is new?

 

[DiveCon]

Hardly.

Lying requires prior knowledge.

Which means that you lie here on a daily basis.

And your posts are nothing but moronic insults.

then they fit you, because you are a moron

 

[Chris]

Rachel is head and shoulders above most of the journalists out there...including Olbermann.

Very bright girl...

 

[DiveCon]

If johnny dollar's place says it, it must be Pulitzer prize journalism

did you watch the video, peabrain?

 

[Kat]

Rachel is head and shoulders above most of the journalists out there...including Olbermann.

Very bright girl...

She's head alright. Lying one. Not very bright. She was easy to discredit.

 

[liebuster]

Rachel is head and shoulders above most of the journalists out there...including Olbermann.

Very bright girl...

You need to go to the first post and watch the video. She proclaims that Fox is a political operation because republican canidates will pitch their fundraising sites while at the same time MSNBC is having democrat canidates pitching their fundraising sites.

The fact is she is not a journalist. She gives her opinion. She gave her opinion that Fox is somehow unmoral because they had political canidates pitch their fundraising sites yet she failed to check if her own network is guiilty of the same thing.

I can tell your a Maddow fan because all you can say is "Fox Lies" and "They are not real news" as if your chosen network is

You don't see commentators on Fox accusing MSNBC commentators of "bad journalistic practices" while at the same time claiming to be a journalist. Yet you see that everyday over at MSNBC. Like I said. The arrogance is beyond words.

 

[Bfgrn]

If johnny dollar's place says it, it must be Pulitzer prize journalism

did you watch the video, peabrain?

Yes I did. And, I watched Rachel Maddow's real segment when it was broadcast. She makes some valid points. Did you?

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nZnMumCKXU"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nZnMumCKXU[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

i watched the video in the OP, pinhead
or i wouldnt have asked you if YOU did
get that, pinhead?

and get this, peabrain, i dont give a RATS ASS how much WHO gave to any candidate
the point is she bitches about the very same thing SHE does
shes a fucking HYPOCRITE

 

[Bfgrn]

i watched the video in the OP, pinhead
or i wouldnt have asked you if YOU did
get that, pinhead?

and get this, peabrain, i dont give a RATS ASS how much WHO gave to any candidate
the point is she bitches about the very same thing SHE does
shes a fucking HYPOCRITE

I watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.

There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.

When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.

 

[DiveCon]

i watched the video in the OP, pinhead
or i wouldnt have asked you if YOU did
get that, pinhead?

and get this, peabrain, i dont give a RATS ASS how much WHO gave to any candidate
the point is she bitches about the very same thing SHE does
shes a fucking HYPOCRITE

I watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.

There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.

When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.

no, you were WRONG, as usual

and you give HER a pass for what you just said was wrong
fuck off you pathetic hypocrite

 

[elvis]

i watched the video in the OP, pinhead
or i wouldnt have asked you if YOU did
get that, pinhead?

and get this, peabrain, i dont give a RATS ASS how much WHO gave to any candidate
the point is she bitches about the very same thing SHE does
shes a fucking HYPOCRITE

I watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.

There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.

When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.

why would anyone be too fearful to watch her?

 

[Bfgrn]

i watched the video in the OP, pinhead
or i wouldnt have asked you if YOU did
get that, pinhead?

and get this, peabrain, i dont give a RATS ASS how much WHO gave to any candidate
the point is she bitches about the very same thing SHE does
shes a fucking HYPOCRITE

I watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.

There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.

When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.

why would anyone be too fearful to watch her?

Ask neg reppin' dive.

 

[DiveCon]

I watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.

There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.

When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.

why would anyone be too fearful to watch her?

Ask neg reppin' dive.

i watched it, fucktard

 

[Bfgrn]

i watched the video in the OP, pinhead
or i wouldnt have asked you if YOU did
get that, pinhead?

and get this, peabrain, i dont give a RATS ASS how much WHO gave to any candidate
the point is she bitches about the very same thing SHE does
shes a fucking HYPOCRITE

I watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.

There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.

When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.

no, you were WRONG, as usual

and you give HER a pass for what you just said was wrong
fuck off you pathetic hypocrite

Try not to overwhelm me with your literary acumen. Please keep it down to something smaller than War & Peace.

I apologize, your literary skills were probably stunted by that mean liberal 9th grade teacher who greeted you with 'nice TOOTH'

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I am beginning to believe Maddow post here.

 

[DiveCon]

I am beginning to believe Maddow post here.

bfgrn?

 

[DiveCon]

I watched the OP video, but I also watched Rachel Maddow's segment which I gave you a link to. I figured you would be too fearful to watch it, I was right.

There is nothing wrong with having candidates on the air, and having a candidate promote their website or fund-raising organization.

When a pundit raises money for a candidate or for a party by making public appearances or making on the air endorsements, it is no longer being a pundit, it is being a political hack. But again, I am not surprised by your position, it fits your lack of intelligence and your lack of ethics and character.

no, you were WRONG, as usual

and you give HER a pass for what you just said was wrong
fuck off you pathetic hypocrite

Try not to overwhelm me with your literary acumen. Please keep it down to something smaller than War & Peace.

I apologize, your literary skills were probably stunted by that mean liberal 9th grade teacher who greeted you with 'nice TOOTH'

sorry i dont meet your pathetic standards on here
go fuck yourself

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I am beginning to believe Maddow post here.

bfgrn?

It's possible