Make no mistake, Harris-Biden will pack the courts

[LeftofLeft]

Harris came off like an insecure HS sophomore last night sneering and jeering and shaking her head at Pence when he was calling out her record. She didn’t have the balls to stand on her own record.

The most confident she got is when Pence called her out to see if she was going to pack the court. First, she played the race card which is what Democrats and Liberals do when they can’t argue then she tried to invoke Lincoln..... but never answered the question.

Democrats lose and they immediately want to change the rules. A Harris-Biden Presidency will result in an expanded Supreme Court and Elimination of the Electoral College.

Harris-Biden. You read that correctly.

 

[rightwinger]

You have a problem with that?

 

[LeftofLeft]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

 

[Brain357]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Repubs see their ideas are not popular. Now they are trying to rule through appointed judges. Lie, cheat, steal, the republican way.

 

[rightwinger]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Childish?

Like refusing to consider an opponents Supreme Court Pick for a year?

Condemn both actions and I will agree with you

 

[Camp]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Actually, the problem developed when Republicans refused to honor the nomination for a replacement justice made by President Obama on March 16, over seven months before the next election and has been compounded by naming a replacement for Ginsburg less than two months from an election. Democrats will always feel cheated, and hence, justified for an evening of the score.

 

[miketx]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Repubs see their ideas are not popular. Now they are trying to rule through appointed judges. Lie, cheat, steal, the republican way.

Wrong, chinaman.

 

[Camp]

Federal Courts are overcrowded. Folks are forced to wait years for their cases to be heard. We need more courts and judges.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

You have a problem with that?

Yes. It is part of the burning down and fundamental transformation of America into something completely different.

If a Democrat tells you they won't pack the court and you believe them, you're an idiot.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Childish?

Like refusing to consider an opponents Supreme Court Pick for a year?

Condemn both actions and I will agree with you

Elections have consequences Democrat scum.

What would scum like Harry Reid do?

 

[rightwinger]

You have a problem with that?

Yes. It is part of the burning down and fundamental transformation of America into something completely different.

If a Democrat tells you they won't pack the court and you believe them, you're an idiot.

Constitution says Congress gets to decide
You have a problem with the Constitution?

Tradition says 9 Justices
Tradition says the sitting President gets to fill vacancies

Tradition loses

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Repubs see their ideas are not popular. Now they are trying to rule through appointed judges. Lie, cheat, steal, the republican way.

So Trump should appoint 5 new SCOTUS Justices today?

 

[rightwinger]

Elections have consequences Democrat scum.

Glad you said that
Dems win the election, they can pack the court

 

[rightwinger]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Repubs see their ideas are not popular. Now they are trying to rule through appointed judges. Lie, cheat, steal, the republican way.

So Trump should appoint 5 new SCOTUS Justices today?

He doesn’t have Congress

 

[LeftofLeft]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Actually, the problem developed when Republicans refused to honor the nomination for a replacement justice made by President Obama on March 16, over seven months before the next election and has been compounded by naming a replacement for Ginsburg less than two months from an election. Democrats will always feel cheated, and hence, justified for an evening of the score.

Evening the score is all part of politics but when that involves radical transformation that includes increasing the size of the court and elimination of the Electoral College, clearly you’ve moved into a mode of vengeance where you are willing to transform the country away from a Representative Democracy.

Or, more likely, modern Democrats don’t know how to win in a Representative Democracy nor do they care. They want more Socialist models of government in the US and they want themselves locked-in as true 1 percenters.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Elections have consequences Democrat scum.

Glad you said that
Dems win the election, they can pack the court

Ya they will. We agree. They will also get rid of the EC.

Democrats aim to fundamentally transform America. This could be the last election if Democrats win.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Democrats openly admit they will pack the court.

Republicans need to start packing the court right now with Republican activist because Democrats will the moment they gain power.

 

[LeftofLeft]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Repubs see their ideas are not popular. Now they are trying to rule through appointed judges. Lie, cheat, steal, the republican way.

So Trump should appoint 5 new SCOTUS Justices today?

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Childish?

Like refusing to consider an opponents Supreme Court Pick for a year?

Condemn both actions and I will agree with you

Great idea. Trump and the Republican Senate should pack the Courts as much as possible. In turn, Democrats will pack them even more. What happens? The Courts become diluted.

The voice of 9 carries more weight and significance than the voice of 15 or 19. But, if liberals want to dilute the significance of the court, let them. It will bite them in the ass.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Repubs see their ideas are not popular. Now they are trying to rule through appointed judges. Lie, cheat, steal, the republican way.

So Trump should appoint 5 new SCOTUS Justices today?

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Childish?

Like refusing to consider an opponents Supreme Court Pick for a year?

Condemn both actions and I will agree with you

Great idea. Trump and the Republican Senate should pack the Courts as much as possible. In turn, Democrats will pack them even more. What happens? The Courts become diluted.

The voice of 9 carries more weight and significance than the voice of 15 or 19. But, if liberals want to dilute the significance of the court, let them. It will bite them in the ass.

This is just like when Democrat scum changed the rules to approve a supreme court justice. This is all their fault. Now a simple majority is all you need and they thought they would never lose power.

 

[rightwinger]

You have a problem with that?

I do. I think it is a childish, knee-jerk reaction to a “problem” that was not a problem until modern Democrats lost elections and their most powerful vehicle for shaping the direction of this country, The Supreme Court.

I have a problem in that a vote in Montana should count as much as a vote in Chicago. I have a problem in that the Legislative Branch and the States should have the biggest weight shaping the direction of our Country.

Harris-Biden will fundamentally transform that.

Actually, the problem developed when Republicans refused to honor the nomination for a replacement justice made by President Obama on March 16, over seven months before the next election and has been compounded by naming a replacement for Ginsburg less than two months from an election. Democrats will always feel cheated, and hence, justified for an evening of the score.

Evening the score is all part of politics but when that involves radical transformation that includes increasing the size of the court and elimination of the Electoral College, clearly you’ve moved into a mode of vengeance where you are willing to transform the country away from a Representative Democracy.

Or, more likely, modern Democrats don’t know how to win in a Representative Democracy nor do they care. They want more Socialist models of government in the US and they want themselves locked-in as true 1 percenters.

It is all about WINNING

Republicans won the Senate and blocked Obama from filling Federal Court seats along with blocking the filling of a Supreme Court vacancy for a year.

Dems win the Senate, they will end the filibuster and add judges to the court.

Who cares as long as you WIN
Voters don’t care