- Thread starter
- #121
Michael Shane DaughtryI’m happy to engage in any kind of introspection. There’s only so far I can go with absurd inaccurate assumptions many of these morons make
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Michael Shane DaughtryI’m happy to engage in any kind of introspection. There’s only so far I can go with absurd inaccurate assumptions many of these morons make
No it doesn’t. Nowhere in my comment did it involve agreeing with me. Scruffy said that Biden and Miorkas ignored every law in the book. That’s an outright falsehood. That’s just a fact, do you agree or disagree?You're really not very good at this. I was pointing out your definition of honesty requires agreeing with you.
And it does. Don't bother denying it.
What about him?Michael Shane Daughtry
The entire riot and insurrection was a fight against law enforcement. Many of the convictions that Trump pardoned were for assaults against police officers. What world are you living in?!The Right have more of a track record of supporting law enforcement. The only time we saw the Right get upset about law enforcement was when a J6 Protestor was shot unarmed - which, coincidentally, was the only time we saw the Left cheer law enforcement. Otherwise, the Left would burn down a city and hurl objects at police.
Why would I explain? I don’t make excuses for Biden. I don’t think he was a good president and I don’t agree with much of what he did. Why are we talking about Biden again?You asked for it, now explain.
Michael Shane Daughtry
You did set a precedent. Duly notedGot his so your going along with that precedent that you think was set to justify your own disregard for law and order. Got it.
Makes you an unprincipled hypocrite and no better than those you criticize
It was a protest against a stolen election, until law enforcement attacked the protesters. Your political persecution doesn't fly. That's my world and the reality of it.The entire riot and insurrection was a fight against law enforcement. Many of the convictions that Trump pardoned were for assaults against police officers. What world are you living in?!
So you admit it was Democrats versus MAGA. Now we're getting somewhereThey can prosecute when laws are broken. That’s how it works
You are welcome to provide parallels in law where this many people received this harsh of treatment for a protest. You are the one coming up empty here.That’s how you’re labeling it but when asked to back it up you come up empty.
You pointed to one case you thought was unfair but provided no reason why you think it was unfair. I posted the facts of the case which you still have t responded to.
LOL................the trigger king attempts in futility.The entire riot and insurrection was a fight against law enforcement.
I don’t think he was a good president and I don’t agree with much of what he did.
Because of your inherent hypocrisy and your reluctance to differentiate the actions of Bidens and Trumps pardons.Why are we talking about Biden again?
Again, you are all up about assaults on police officers. Where were you during 2020 when police officers were getting assaulted? As for the pardons for assaults on the Capitol, Carter and Clinton set precedent.The entire riot and insurrection was a fight against law enforcement. Many of the convictions that Trump pardoned were for assaults against police officers. What world are you living in?!
So you say. If that’s what you believe then aren’t you being an unprocessed hypocrite by doing the same as those who you criticize?You did set a precedent. Duly noted
Police attacked protestors and made them break into the capital and destroy shit?! Yeah right. Do you even hear yourself?It was a protest against a stolen election, until law enforcement attacked the protesters. Your political persecution doesn't fly. That's my world and the reality of it.
It was law enforcement vs MAGA insurrectionists and rioters. Not what you saidSo you admit it was Democrats versus MAGA. Now we're getting somewhere
The case you posted about laid out laws that a jury found the defendant broke. The penalty for the laws he was found guilty for added up to 30-37 months imprisonment. He got 19 months. What’s your issue?You are welcome to provide parallels in law where this many people received this harsh of treatment for a protest. You are the one coming up empty here.
I still have to go back to the precedent you set during the summer of love.
“Controlling the legal authority” is not part of the definition of insurrection. If you disagree then post and source the definition.You want to argue, again, ad nauseam, over the legal definitions of insurrection, even no 'controlling legal authority' ever breached that premise?
I literally just posted it. Why do you need another post?Funny, I couldn't locate a post where you thought Biden was wrong for pardoning a guy who killed two FBI agents....but you're all over Trump for pardoning a bunch of violent 'non cop killers'.
This thread isn’t about Biden. You’re trying to make it so to distract from the topic.of your inherent hypocrisy and your reluctance to differentiate the actions of Bidens and Trumps pardons.
Smatter', can't defend your own hypocrisy?“Controlling the legal authority” is not part of the definition of insurrection. If you disagree then post and source the definition.