More Slings And Arrows For Jews From Progressives

Both the Bolshevik and French revolutions demonstrated that progressivism leads to the death of everyone who isn’t considered the most radical.

French Revolution didn't kill that many people.... On the other hand, the American revolution lead to an extension of slavery and genocide of Native Americans that wouldn't have happened had the British won.

Of course if you were too stupid to see the correlation between today’s progressivism and yesteryears before, you will probably ignore what I am saying now and you will likely be slain by one of your “allies” later if someone like myself doesn’t get to you first. I just hope I get to witness your death either way.

Buddy, I'm a tough old Army vet.... someone who comes after me will be making a terminal career choice.



"French Revolution didn't kill that many people."


Why that driving need you have to prove you're a total imbecile???


A well-deserved self-hatred????




In the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

"That's in a country with between 24 and 26 million people, about the current population of Texas. In terms of population loss, that would be the equivalent of the United States having a 9/11 attack every day for seven years." Coulter, "Demonic," p. 266.


And that's not counting the 100 million slaughtered in the revolutions that modeled the French Revolution.
 
Last edited:
Both the Bolshevik and French revolutions demonstrated that progressivism leads to the death of everyone who isn’t considered the most radical.

French Revolution didn't kill that many people.... On the other hand, the American revolution lead to an extension of slavery and genocide of Native Americans that wouldn't have happened had the British won.

Of course if you were too stupid to see the correlation between today’s progressivism and yesteryears before, you will probably ignore what I am saying now and you will likely be slain by one of your “allies” later if someone like myself doesn’t get to you first. I just hope I get to witness your death either way.

Buddy, I'm a tough old Army vet.... someone who comes after me will be making a terminal career choice.



"French Revolution didn't kill that many people."


Why that driving need you have to prove you're a total imbecile???


A well-deserved self-hatred????




. In the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

"That's in a country with between 24 and 26 million people, about the current population of Texas. In terms of population loss, that would be the equivalent of the United States having a 9/11 attack every day for seven years." Coulter, "Demonic," p. 266.


And that's not counting the 100 million slaughtered in the revolutions that modeled the French Revolution.


JoeB131 bats .997 at being wrong. ;)
 
….with a theological basis.

Progressive….meaning ‘progress’? Seems, instead, they’ve devolved to that ol’ time religion to attack Jews.




1.The Democrat Party et al is well known to be anti-Semitic….here, tons of proof:

Jews and Democrats….Oil and Water ...which includes this warning…

“America’s Democratic Party is failing to purge from its own ranks agitators against the Jews. It’s even elevating them to important committees.

“Some of the most fashionable, high-profile progressives in the country at the moment — the leaders of the Women’s March, groundbreaking politicians celebrated for shattering glass ceilings — are the ones who hold deeply disturbing views …

We are in the early stages of an election where anti-Semitism is likely to emerge as one of the issues…” A Pasionara Against Progressive Anti-Semitism





2. From the Jewish magazine, The Tablet, an erudite explanation of the Progressive Theology (Why the Left Is Repeating Christianity's Most Dangerous Historical Mistakes, and Why It's Bad for the Jews)

The author provides an impassioned attempt to explain Progressives hatred of Israel as in " the early history of Christianity….What we’re seeing right now, then, is the strange spectacle of progressives pursuing the same thorny theology that much of Christendom abandoned long ago, the theology of supersessionism. Also known as replacement theology, this idea developed early on in the history of Christianity, …[if] Christians were God’s new chosen people, what, then, was to be done about the chosen people of old, the Jews? …the Jews had forfeited their right to their special status…




3. …it was Augustine …the early Christian theologian was, as ever, the smartest person around, and he offered his fellow Christians a better alternative. The Jews, he argued, were Christianity’s witnesses: “But the Jews who slew Him,” he wrote, referring, naturally, to Jesus, “are thus by their own Scriptures a testimony to us that we have not forged the prophecies about Christ.” See things this way and the Jews are no longer worthy of eternal servitude. Instead, they become intimates of their Christian brothers and sisters. “For in the Jewish people was figured the Christian people,” Augustine wrote.

4. While the Celts and the Druids and the other tribes who came under the church’s rule could be slaughtered or assimilated or otherwise made to disappear, the Jews continued to pose a special problem: Christian civilization, it seemed, often couldn’t live without them, and even more often couldn’t live with them. And so, the Jews were mocked, discriminated against, relegated to narrow ghettos, forced to convert, tortured by the Inquisition, expelled, accused, despised. But they persisted, because all but the most maniacal bigots understood that they were the children of God, and that their covenant with the Creator, even if you believed it to have expired, was still meaningful enough to respect, however begrudgingly.” Why the Left Is Repeating Christianity's Most Dangerous Historical Mistakes, and Why It's Bad for the Jews



So....according to the most atavistic of Christians.....who were the new 'chosen people'???

“Supersessionism, also called replacement theology or fulfillment theology, is a Christian doctrine which asserts that the New Covenant through Jesus Christsupersedes the Old Covenant, which was made exclusively with the Jewish people.” Supersessionism - Wikipedia

No longer Christian doctrine…..but useful to Progressives.





Next….how and why Christianity gave replacement theology up.
I think saying, that "Christians" persecuted Jews, is a little bit inaccurate and vague. It was The State Church of Rome that did the overwhelming majority of that. Roman Catholicism.

But as your comments about The Democrat Party, there is a reason I call them DemNazis.



"I think saying, that "Christians" persecuted Jews, is a little bit inaccurate and vague. "

Actually, it is factual.

But I believe you missed some of the thread.
While early Christian fundamentalists aimed to eliminate the Jews, feeling that they had replaced them as the chosen people through Christ, Augustine made the case that the Jews remained an important aspect of the history of religion.


And it is the Progressives who have assumed the position of those early fundamentalists.

You can see the anti-Semitism in Omar, Ocasio, et al.....but the Democrats have no Augustine.

I am not disagreeing with your premise. I am saying that one part of it is too general, or rather the source of your comments which you provided through your research...that person is who stated that Christianity persecuted Jews, and that statement was too general.

There were many Jewish Messianic Churches. These Jews were not persecuted. There were many "informal churches" that entirely embraced and understood The Inheritance that The Jews had passed on to Christianity, and they did not persecute Jews, they befriended them.

Primarily, Persecution of Jews was done by The Official State Church of The Roman Empire, The Catholic Church, which some will argue is not actually Christianity but is a mash up of Roman Pantheism, and Christianity. But that is another topic.

Other than that, I completely agree with everything you wrote. On the point I disagreed with, that is too much of a voluminous topic, & that discussion would take up way too much space in your thread to properly discuss. I was just disagreeing on a minor point.
 
its good to have a well armed and lethal Ally named Israel in the middle east den of enemies .
 
CopyPaste Barbie wants us to believe she gives a shit about Jews.

upload_2019-3-7_22-9-15-gif.249213
upload_2019-3-7_22-9-16-gif.249214
upload_2019-3-7_22-9-17-gif.249215
 
its good to have a well armed and lethal Ally named Israel in the middle east den of enemies .


But it seems the battle is right here in Washington, D.C.

It didn't start with Obama, but he sure poured a lot of gas on the fire to push Antisemitism to the forefront in America and around The World.

Obama's History of Hostile Actions Against Israel


... after 8 year of what all evidence indicates as having fronted a Muslim as President….yes, that’s what analysis proves……and I’d be happy to provide that evidence for any who need be ‘woke.’




Obama-Farrakhan-Photo.jpg
 
its good to have a well armed and lethal Ally named Israel in the middle east den of enemies .


But it seems the battle is right here in Washington, D.C.

It didn't start with Obama, but he sure poured a lot of gas on the fire to push Antisemitism to the forefront in America and around The World.

Obama's History of Hostile Actions Against Israel


... after 8 year of what all evidence indicates as having fronted a Muslim as President….yes, that’s what analysis proves……and I’d be happy to provide that evidence for any who need be ‘woke.’




Obama-Farrakhan-Photo.jpg
we have a First Amendment.
 
There's nothing to apologize for. America is the strongest and freest nation on the planet.

Nothing to apologize for?

How about slavery?
The Trail of Tears?
Internment of Japanese Americans in WWII?
Wars of aggression in Iraq, Vietnam and the Philippines, not to mention a lot of intervention in Latin America?

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man." "

Um.. yeah, they kind of were! What's your point?
 
There's nothing to apologize for. America is the strongest and freest nation on the planet.

Nothing to apologize for?

How about slavery?
The Trail of Tears?
Internment of Japanese Americans in WWII?
Wars of aggression in Iraq, Vietnam and the Philippines, not to mention a lot of intervention in Latin America?

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man." "

Um.. yeah, they kind of were! What's your point?
Lol
You do realize the original slaveowners on this continent were my ancestors American Indians... And they were socialists
 
... after 8 year of what all evidence indicates as having fronted a Muslim as President….yes, that’s what analysis proves……and I’d be happy to provide that evidence for any who need be ‘woke.’

He brought us back from the worst recession in 80 years... He could worship Dread C'Thulhu for all I care.


Your lies are easier and easier to destroy....you need that B12 shot...


Watch this:

Here is the Left-leaning Reuters shooting your post to ribbon>


"The unemployment rate announced three days after his election was 6.5%....not particularly terrible. But it was the only economic news, and had Obama insisting we were suffering "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression."
Obama: U.S. in worst crisis since Depression | Reuters




Remember the last time you were right about anything....?



Me neither.
 
There's nothing to apologize for. America is the strongest and freest nation on the planet.

Nothing to apologize for?

How about slavery?
The Trail of Tears?
Internment of Japanese Americans in WWII?
Wars of aggression in Iraq, Vietnam and the Philippines, not to mention a lot of intervention in Latin America?

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man." "

Um.. yeah, they kind of were! What's your point?

Shut your silly communist ass up with your bullshit? :dunno:
 
In the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

Yeah, that's really not a lot of people. We killed a lot more Native Americans... and more people died in single battles in WWI or WWII.


1. There are no 'Native' Americans....not if you're applying the term to the stone age savages who made war on each other and the settlers.
Any who are born here are native.

2. "We" didn't kill most....disease did.

Gads, you're a dunce....a compendium of every anti-America trope




3. And...yes.....600,000 is quite a lot of people.
Only your forebears, the Bolsheviks slaughtered more.....taking their instructions from the French Revolution.
Bolsheviks claimed descent: “Historians of the French Revolution, which the Russians saw as a model for their own…” Bolshevik Festivals, 1917–1920



Have you ever read a book???

I know...silly question to ask a Leftist.
 
"The unemployment rate announced three days after his election was 6.5%....not particularly terrible.

Are you some kind of a fucking retard? In November 2008, EVERYONE knew the economy was collapsing due to the Stock market crash that happened in September. Everyone KNEW there were going to be huge slashes in payroll on top of the ones companies were already doing. The whole economy was in COMPLETE panic mode.
 
"The unemployment rate announced three days after his election was 6.5%....not particularly terrible.

Are you some kind of a fucking retard? In November 2008, EVERYONE knew the economy was collapsing due to the Stock market crash that happened in September. Everyone KNEW there were going to be huge slashes in payroll on top of the ones companies were already doing. The whole economy was in COMPLETE panic mode.



It seems you've picked up the greater part of your vocabulary from men's rooms walls. How droll.


There is a simple explanation, so simple that even one such as you, with your limited ....ability....may understand your propensity:

Time and again, when folks realize they have been skewered, that they have no adequate response to truth that destroys their worldview, their most closely held beliefs, their language falls to the vulgar.

It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at being bested leaks out as vulgarity.

That would be you.



Now get lost.
 
It seems you've picked up the greater part of your vocabulary from men's rooms walls. How droll.

You really are a retard if your interpretation of the crash of 2008 was 'Well, things weren't that bad in November". If you are this much of a complete fucking idiot, there's really no point talking to you, no matter how smart you feel cutting and pasting shit you found on other websites.

I lived through 2008. I watched one company have to essentially shed half of its staff because it lost 70% of its business that year.

Seriously, how fucking stupid are you? Did you even have a job where you were gainfully employed in the business world in 2008?
 

Forum List

Back
Top