depotoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 9, 2012
- 40,718
- 13,425
- 2,280
Do remember they stated up to 2.5c variance is acceptable , in their world. Of course it is. They need that much to make the false modeling work, to prove (haha) agw is happening.
I think billy has provided the raw data and it doesn't line up with the NOAA?no their not. And dude/ dudette, you can post that false statement daily for all i care, but everyone else knows it isn't. So raw data is specially held at the NOAA and NASA offices.
All the raw data in the world is held prisoner by NOAA and NASA?
You understand you're living in a weirdass alternate reality, right?
There is one more office, can't remember which one, that also has it, and they all supply the graphs to the world.
Since the raw data is available online, can you inform us of the mechanism by which these 3 nefarious organizations block the rest of the world from getting it? Are they perhaps mind controlling everyone to prevent them from downloading it?
Here's just one place to get it.
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v3/
---
V3 contains two different dataset files per each of the three elements.
"QCU" files represent the quality controlled unadjusted data, and
"QCA" files represent the quality controlled adjusted data.
---
Three sites, that's it for the globe? And getting raw data is impossible. There wouldn't be any court cases if that weren't true.
Given I just showed everyone one place to get the raw data, you got some 'splainin to do concerning why you're telling such a crazy lie.
On many occasions i have provided the raw data. And no it does not line up with the adjusted crap NOAA has been spewing.. 1.32 deg C in upward adjustments, it is rather stunning to see how badly we have been lied too.