New ice age in the near future !

[skookerasbil]

Many Flat-earthers sincerely believe the earth is flat. They're still wrong, because all the hard data says they're wrong. The same applies to your beliefs. The hard data contradicts them, so they're wrong, regardless of how fanatical your belief is.

Many Jehovah's witnesses sincerely believe Jesus returned and this is the millennial kingdom. They're still wrong and cultist nutjobs. Empirical data shows no significant temperature rise since 1998.

What has global warming done since 1998?

Facts are facts, regardless of your insane religion.

From your own link:
Every part of the Earth's climate system has continued warming since 1998, with 2015 shattering temperature records.

Only the Karl et al adjusted data sets show warming. All others have been cooling since 1998 as are the balloon radiosonde data sets. I will take empirically observed evidence over your Karl et al crap every time.

BULLSHIT!
As you well know the Karl et al report has been independently confirmed, not that you deniers would care about real confirmed facts and data.

Eat your own bull shit. Karl Et Al and many other "adjustments" are totally unwarranted.. but you like playing with failed models...
China coal use exploding, U.S. leads world in CO2 reductions, alarmist media conceal all this & much more

Left wing lying bigots....

And those models reflect the programmed assumptions – clearly false.

Weather cycles only, not climate-change.

China is an afterthought with the fakers.....by design. The fakers never tell you that if the US disappeared from the earth tomorrow, the temperature would be lowered by 0.1 degree by 2100!!!!

 

[Crick]

Billy

Karl et al 2015

Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus

Confirming studies

Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature
Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature

Total volcanic stratospheric aerosol optical depths and implications for global climate change
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2014GL061541

The “Pause” in Global Warming: Turning a Routine Fluctuation into a Problem for Science
https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00106.1

Eurasian winter cooling in the warming hiatus of 1998–2012
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015GL065327

Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends
https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/qj.2297

A monthly and latitudinally varying volcanic forcing dataset in simulations of 20th century climate
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2003GL016875

 

[skookerasbil]

Hey Billy......

Russian Scientists Predict Ice Age Within 15 Years

 

[Billy_Bob]

Billy

Karl et al 2015

Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus

Confirming studies

Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature
Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature

Total volcanic stratospheric aerosol optical depths and implications for global climate change
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2014GL061541

The “Pause” in Global Warming: Turning a Routine Fluctuation into a Problem for Science
https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00106.1

Eurasian winter cooling in the warming hiatus of 1998–2012
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015GL065327

Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends
https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/qj.2297

A monthly and latitudinally varying volcanic forcing dataset in simulations of 20th century climate
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2003GL016875

I Love it..

You just tried to explain away why Karl Et Al can not predict crap and why its pontifications are bull shit. Your listing excuse after excuse for why Karl Et Al is crap. And you cant even see it.. Priceless..

 

[Crick]

Billy

Karl et al 2015

Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus

Confirming studies

Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature
Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature

Total volcanic stratospheric aerosol optical depths and implications for global climate change
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2014GL061541

The “Pause” in Global Warming: Turning a Routine Fluctuation into a Problem for Science
https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00106.1

Eurasian winter cooling in the warming hiatus of 1998–2012
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015GL065327

Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends
https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/qj.2297

A monthly and latitudinally varying volcanic forcing dataset in simulations of 20th century climate
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2003GL016875

I Love it..

You just tried to explain away why Karl Et Al can not predict crap and why its pontifications are bull shit. Your listing excuse after excuse for why Karl Et Al is crap. And you cant even see it.. Priceless..

I think you may be confused. Karl et al 2015 was a corrected global temperature dataset, not a prediction. Karl et al found that the hiatus was an artifact of processing that did not take note of changes in SST sampling and increased numbers of land stations. While the point is not their primary topic, all of the studies listed above accept and confirm Karl et al 2015. That you would be looking for multiple published studies whose topic was "Is Karl et al correct?" doesn't surprise me. You don't seem to have a thorough knowledge base on how science is conducted.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Billy

Karl et al 2015

Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus

Confirming studies

Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature
Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature

Total volcanic stratospheric aerosol optical depths and implications for global climate change
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2014GL061541

The “Pause” in Global Warming: Turning a Routine Fluctuation into a Problem for Science
https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00106.1

Eurasian winter cooling in the warming hiatus of 1998–2012
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015GL065327

Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends
https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/qj.2297

A monthly and latitudinally varying volcanic forcing dataset in simulations of 20th century climate
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2003GL016875

I Love it..

You just tried to explain away why Karl Et Al can not predict crap and why its pontifications are bull shit. Your listing excuse after excuse for why Karl Et Al is crap. And you cant even see it.. Priceless..

I think you may be confused. Karl et al 2015 was a corrected global temperature dataset, not a prediction. Karl et al found that the hiatus was an artifact of processing that did not take note of changes in SST sampling and increased numbers of land stations. While the point is not their primary topic, all of the studies listed above accept and confirm Karl et al 2015. That you would be looking for multiple published studies whose topic was "Is Karl et al correct?" doesn't surprise me. You don't seem to have a thorough knowledge base on how science is conducted.

You really are an idiot..

Tell me Crick, what region of down-welling solar radiation is responsible for ocean warming to 700m?

Now tell me what a reduction in energy in that band would do to the oceans?

Your the one who hasn't a damn clue about science or how it is conducted. Karl Et Al is peer review by circle jerk. A bunch of idiots all slapping themselves on the back without critical review. Stupid is as stupid does..

 

[Billy_Bob]

Hey Billy......

Russian Scientists Predict Ice Age Within 15 Years

If you look at their report they see the solar energy drop out as well. They are using the ability to think critically and cognitively, unlike our alarmist fools here. Their assessment is correct and its going to bite the alarmists in the ass hard. The cooling of median oceans has already started.

The cooling from Solar drop out is seen in the last 6 months of data.. to over 700m in depth.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

When solar activity diminishes long enough, there will be a significant cooling trend ahead,

Sure, if the sun's output decreased 5%, there would be a cooling trend, but that's not gong to happen. No realistically possible amount of solar dimming is going to stop the man-made warming. At most, it can only slow down the warming a bit.

Then on top of that we are nearing the end of the periodic 350 year warming cycle, which has been ongoing since the beginning of the Minoan warm phase. There is a clear 900-1100 year cycle where it warms significantly, then cools significantly, with an over all COOLING trend over the last 3,250 years as the interglacial period is in the Autumnal part of the cycle.

So, do tell, what causes these magic cycles? Be specific.

Oh, that's right. Nobody knows. It was just curve fitting and mathturbation.

It also featured a fine cherrypicking deception, using one point on an ice sheet,

And it tossed in a "let's cut off the most recent 100 years of warming" deception.

Because the sun rings like a bell. Meaning it's solar output (emissions) shift back and forth on a regular basis.

*****SMILE*****

 

[peach174]

decrease in solar activity may indicate looming drop in global temps ! Diminishing solar activity may bring new Ice Age by 2030 – Astronomy Now

They said that same thing in the 1970's.
We were going to go into a Ice Age .
It didn't happen.

 

[gtopa1]

decrease in solar activity may indicate looming drop in global temps ! Diminishing solar activity may bring new Ice Age by 2030 – Astronomy Now

Oh gawd; back to the 70s. lol

Greg

 

[Likkmee]

 

[ralfy]

From "The Escalator":

 

[gtopa1]

Jesus has a sense of humour too.

Greg

 

[Likkmee]

Until he comes back when he makes Mohammed Ali sound like a choir boy.

 

[gtopa1]

decrease in solar activity may indicate looming drop in global temps ! Diminishing solar activity may bring new Ice Age by 2030 – Astronomy Now

They said that same thing in the 1970's.
We were going to go into a Ice Age .
It didn't happen.

Fifteen years later the same deadheads were talking about AGW: it was all America's fault.

This was one of the creeps. He was my lecturer in a subject on the Environment/Biology. Bloody fruit loop!!!

Ian Lowe: How the media has let us down on global warming

Greg

 

[skookerasbil]

decrease in solar activity may indicate looming drop in global temps ! Diminishing solar activity may bring new Ice Age by 2030 – Astronomy Now

They said that same thing in the 1970's.
We were going to go into a Ice Age .
It didn't happen.

Fifteen years later the same deadheads were talking about AGW: it was all America's fault.

This was one of the creeps. He was my lecturer in a subject on the Environment/Biology. Bloody fruit loop!!!

Ian Lowe: How the media has let us down on global warming

Greg

Lmao....these smart ass professors not smart enough to realize that people who seek the media want to watch/read/listen to things that are of interest to them. The ratings follow. Fucking duh. Nobody wants to tune into stories on climate change.

 

[Billy_Bob]

decrease in solar activity may indicate looming drop in global temps ! Diminishing solar activity may bring new Ice Age by 2030 – Astronomy Now

They said that same thing in the 1970's.
We were going to go into a Ice Age .
It didn't happen.

The suns output had not shifted. We got a normal cyclical low cycle progression and cooling. This time is very different. We have lost output in the range that warms earths oceans, something we have never seen before.

This is the region of down-welling radiation that penetrates our oceans and warms them. Its bottoming out in relative terms. If this persists our oceans will cool rapidly. Talk about a major blow to our input energy..

The blue line I added above is average...

Below is the result of that energy loss.

The cooling shift has started and what is coming is going to rattle man to his core.

The ocean buffer is expended and cooling is now going to rule for a while. The loss were seeing today, when you do the math, is capable of -2.2 deg C globally inside 10 years. Hang on to your ass.

 

[Indeependent]

The world cannot end until every take of every Beatles song has been remastered to death.

 

[yidnar]

the average temp in the state of Texas in the yr 1955 was higher 1933 was higher that it was in 2015 ! there is no sustained global warming trend !

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Meaning it's solar output (emissions) shift back and forth on a regular basis.

And who taught you that?