Donald Trump seeks to toss New York hush money conviction hours after Supreme Court ruling

[WEATHER53]

We are lectured by our MAGA chums, led by an orange crime prophet, swept along by a fake alarmism, being overwhelmed by their irrational fears of a world only the Orange Prophet supposedly can stop. We should be compassionate with them, but not allow our sympathy to enable their neuroses.

We state facts, it doesn’t match your wishes and feelings so you emote that it’s a lecture

 

[Blisterfinger]

You have to be real stupid to think that Trumps NY crimes have anything to do with presidential immunity

Trump's trial was a sham and a fake. Propaganda for the gullible

 

[d0gbreath]

There was no falsification because it’s a permitted act to pay for non disclosure
Since there was no underlying criminal act , the witch hunters concocted it was an impermissible methodology and connected theoretical dots
It’s actually hard to explain what the lib loon contention really is because there really is No Legal violation that occurred. Just the theoretical about what Trump “” to do

So, being a scumbag doesn't matter?

 

[Skylar]

And the children still trying to twist the pretzel further

Due, the verdict is in. Trump is a convicted felon.

Y'all are the one's left trying to spin the signing of private checks to cover up an affair with a porn star as an 'official act' of the Presidency.

Good luck.

 

[Skylar]

Trump's trial was a sham and a fake. Propaganda for the gullible

The trial was due process. As was the verdict. That you don't like the verdict doesn't magically make any less legally binding, or authoritative.

 

[Skylar]

So I use the unusual word “brainless” in my addressing you and you respond with a copycat, not original thought of “no….you are brainless” That’s because You ARE Brainless child.

And by 'copycat', you mean citing the actual law, the actual verdict?

Again, the verdict is in. You can desperately spin it to your heart's content. But trying to argue that a falsifying private business records in a private company to cover up a private affair is somehow an official act of the presidency?

That's meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish.

 

[Skylar]

You have to be real stupid to think that Trumps NY crimes have anything to do with presidential immunity

Laughing....but Trump's lawyers, that Trump pays, said he has a 'good argument'. Isn't that enough?

Why would you expect them to actually think about that pseudo-legal horseshit?

 

[Captain Caveman]

So I use the unusual word “brainless” in my addressing you and you respond with a copycat, not original thought of “no….you are brainless” That’s because You ARE Brainless child.

Omg, that flew over your head. I used brainless because of your brainless post trying to call someone brainless, lmfao. You yanks just don't grasp sarcasm, lol.

And you think the word brainless is unusual? Blimey, we use it everyday when replying to Labourites (idiots that support Labour in the UK, incase you didn't know, brainless child)

(Note - added a little bit sarcasm in my post, see if you can find it. Clue - last two words in the brackets)