New Yorker Says It's Time to Torch the Constitution (but Donald Trump's the Dictator)

[Doc7505]

New Yorker Says It's Time to Torch the Constitution ​

(but Donald Trump's the Dictator)​

New Yorker Says It's Time to Torch the Constitution (but Donald Trump's the Dictator)

twitchy.com

30 Sep 2024 ~~ By Amy Curtis

When the Left tells you who they are, believe them. John Kerry said the First Amendment is a 'roadblock' to instituting their agenda, and needs to be curtailed to stop 'misinformation' and build a 'consensus'. This is their way of saying you'll either agree with the Leftist agenda or they'll shut you up and punish you.
So much freedom, though.
Obama called the Constitution a barrier.
It's a theme.
Here's The New Yorker calling for the torching of the Constitution:

​

Wow.
Abandoned the Constitution.
They actually said it.
~Snip~
They want to destroy America. And this is how they planned to do it.

​

Commentary:
It has been a pillar of "Progressive" ideology, since turn of the 20th Century that the Constitution is outdated and a barrier to "Progress". From Woodrow Wilson, a foremost archetict of "Progressivism" (before and after he became President", written in 1897

Applied in a democratic state, such doctrine sounds radical, but not revolutionary. It is only an acceptance of the extremest logical conclusions deducible from democratic principles long ago received as respectable. For it is very clear that in fundamental theory socialism and democracy are almost if not quite one and the same. They both rest at bottom upon the absolute right of the community to determine its own destiny and that of its members. Men as communities are supreme over men as individuals. Limits of wisdom and convenience to the public control there may be: limits of principle there are, upon strict analysis, none. ​

— Woodrow Wilson, Socialism and Democracy, 1887​

This analysis is against the whole structure of the Constitution as limiting the power of the state; No Bill of Rights; No Federalism; No balancing of state power against federal power;
No protection of individuals against the power of the government.
The Neo-Marxist Left will be emboldened at some point to begin (or rather ramp up severely) violating constitutional rights- regardless of what the SC rules- There are 1000’s of peaceful people who have been arrested, imprisoned, and sent to solitary for years who did nothing wrong- worse is coming it seems-
Obama's "Fundamental Transformation of America"and destruction of the U.S. Constitution including it's Amendements continues.

 

[progressive hunter]

New Yorker Says It's Time to Torch the Constitution ​

(but Donald Trump's the Dictator)​

New Yorker Says It's Time to Torch the Constitution (but Donald Trump's the Dictator)

twitchy.com

30 Sep 2024 ~~ By Amy Curtis

When the Left tells you who they are, believe them. John Kerry said the First Amendment is a 'roadblock' to instituting their agenda, and needs to be curtailed to stop 'misinformation' and build a 'consensus'. This is their way of saying you'll either agree with the Leftist agenda or they'll shut you up and punish you.
So much freedom, though.
Obama called the Constitution a barrier.
It's a theme.
Here's The New Yorker calling for the torching of the Constitution:

​

Wow.
Abandoned the Constitution.
They actually said it.
~Snip~
They want to destroy America. And this is how they planned to do it.

​

Commentary:
It has been a pillar of "Progressive" ideology, since turn of the 20th Century that the Constitution is outdated and a barrier to "Progress". From Woodrow Wilson, a foremost archetict of "Progressivism" (before and after he became President", written in 1897

Applied in a democratic state, such doctrine sounds radical, but not revolutionary. It is only an acceptance of the extremest logical conclusions deducible from democratic principles long ago received as respectable. For it is very clear that in fundamental theory socialism and democracy are almost if not quite one and the same. They both rest at bottom upon the absolute right of the community to determine its own destiny and that of its members. Men as communities are supreme over men as individuals. Limits of wisdom and convenience to the public control there may be: limits of principle there are, upon strict analysis, none. ​

— Woodrow Wilson, Socialism and Democracy, 1887​

This analysis is against the whole structure of the Constitution as limiting the power of the state; No Bill of Rights; No Federalism; No balancing of state power against federal power;
No protection of individuals against the power of the government.
The Neo-Marxist Left will be emboldened at some point to begin (or rather ramp up severely) violating constitutional rights- regardless of what the SC rules- There are 1000’s of peaceful people who have been arrested, imprisoned, and sent to solitary for years who did nothing wrong- worse is coming it seems-
Obama's "Fundamental Transformation of America"and destruction of the U.S. Constitution including it's Amendements continues.

John Kerry: First Amendment stands as a major block

“But, look, if people go to only one source, and the source they go to is sick and has an agenda, and they’re putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to hammer it out of existence,” Kerry said...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[1srelluc]

Blah, failed rag trying to be relevant.

 

[lafayette]

John Kerry: First Amendment stands as a major block
“But, look, if people go to only one source, and the source they go to is sick and has an agenda, and they’re putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to hammer it out of existence,” Kerry said...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Rambunctious]

Hillary calls for reeducation camps... John Kerry calls for ending the 1st amendment... and now this... a left wing rag calling to burn the US constitution.....
Anymore stupid questions libs on which side hates democracy?...

 

[berg80]

New Yorker Says It's Time to Torch the Constitution ​

(but Donald Trump's the Dictator)​

New Yorker Says It's Time to Torch the Constitution (but Donald Trump's the Dictator)

twitchy.com

30 Sep 2024 ~~ By Amy Curtis

When the Left tells you who they are, believe them. John Kerry said the First Amendment is a 'roadblock' to instituting their agenda, and needs to be curtailed to stop 'misinformation' and build a 'consensus'. This is their way of saying you'll either agree with the Leftist agenda or they'll shut you up and punish you.
So much freedom, though.
Obama called the Constitution a barrier.
It's a theme.
Here's The New Yorker calling for the torching of the Constitution:

​

Wow.
Abandoned the Constitution.
They actually said it.
~Snip~
They want to destroy America. And this is how they planned to do it.

​

Commentary:
It has been a pillar of "Progressive" ideology, since turn of the 20th Century that the Constitution is outdated and a barrier to "Progress". From Woodrow Wilson, a foremost archetict of "Progressivism" (before and after he became President", written in 1897

Applied in a democratic state, such doctrine sounds radical, but not revolutionary. It is only an acceptance of the extremest logical conclusions deducible from democratic principles long ago received as respectable. For it is very clear that in fundamental theory socialism and democracy are almost if not quite one and the same. They both rest at bottom upon the absolute right of the community to determine its own destiny and that of its members. Men as communities are supreme over men as individuals. Limits of wisdom and convenience to the public control there may be: limits of principle there are, upon strict analysis, none. ​

— Woodrow Wilson, Socialism and Democracy, 1887​

This analysis is against the whole structure of the Constitution as limiting the power of the state; No Bill of Rights; No Federalism; No balancing of state power against federal power;
No protection of individuals against the power of the government.
The Neo-Marxist Left will be emboldened at some point to begin (or rather ramp up severely) violating constitutional rights- regardless of what the SC rules- There are 1000’s of peaceful people who have been arrested, imprisoned, and sent to solitary for years who did nothing wrong- worse is coming it seems-
Obama's "Fundamental Transformation of America"and destruction of the U.S. Constitution including it's Amendements continues.

The New Yorker said no such thing. A writer who contributes to the New Yorker wrote a book titled, "No Democracy Lasts Forever."

Chemerinsky had little to say that was critical of the Constitution, and he praised the difficulty of amending it. Something like 11,848 constitutional amendments have been introduced in Congress since 1789. (You can examine them on Jill Lepore’s Amend Project Web site.) Congress has ratified only thirty-three by the required two-thirds majority, and only twenty-seven were then ratified by three-quarters of the states, becoming law. The first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights, were written by James Madison to help the Constitution secure ratification, so they are essentially part of the Constitution itself, and two of those which followed are the prohibition amendment and its repeal—which nets fifteen amendments in two hundred and thirty-three years.

Isn’t this undemocratic, sticking us with a dead-hand document that we can’t change when the times do? Not at all, Chemerinsky explained. The reason the Constitution was made difficult to amend is the tyranny-of-the-majority problem. In times of crisis, majorities may want to suspend individual liberties, and the Constitution makes it very hard for them to do this (which doesn’t mean that it has never been done). “The Constitution is society’s attempt to protect itself from itself,” Chemerinsky concluded.

That was then. Chemerinsky’s new book is “No Democracy Lasts Forever: How the Constitution Threatens the United States” (Liveright), and the difficulty of amending the Constitution is Exhibit A. “The framers of the Constitution went too far in preventing amendments,” he now argues. As a result, we are stuck with a set of rules which not only makes addressing political problems harder but is itself responsible for many of the political problems we need to address. The Constitution’s “very existence as a largely unchanged document has become a sledgehammer wielded by a minority to prop up a system that engenders polarization and festering national discord,” he says. Chemerinsky doesn’t just want to amend the Constitution, either. He wants us to throw it out and come up with a new one.

Is It Time to Torch the Constitution?

Some scholars say that it’s to blame for our political dysfunction—and that we need to start over.

www.newyorker.com

Try to get the story right next time, cuck.

 

[SeaMajor7]

The New Yorker said no such thing. A writer who contributes to the New Yorker wrote a book titled, "No Democracy Lasts Forever."

Chemerinsky had little to say that was critical of the Constitution, and he praised the difficulty of amending it. Something like 11,848 constitutional amendments have been introduced in Congress since 1789. (You can examine them on Jill Lepore’s Amend Project Web site.) Congress has ratified only thirty-three by the required two-thirds majority, and only twenty-seven were then ratified by three-quarters of the states, becoming law. The first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights, were written by James Madison to help the Constitution secure ratification, so they are essentially part of the Constitution itself, and two of those which followed are the prohibition amendment and its repeal—which nets fifteen amendments in two hundred and thirty-three years.

Isn’t this undemocratic, sticking us with a dead-hand document that we can’t change when the times do? Not at all, Chemerinsky explained. The reason the Constitution was made difficult to amend is the tyranny-of-the-majority problem. In times of crisis, majorities may want to suspend individual liberties, and the Constitution makes it very hard for them to do this (which doesn’t mean that it has never been done). “The Constitution is society’s attempt to protect itself from itself,” Chemerinsky concluded.

That was then. Chemerinsky’s new book is “No Democracy Lasts Forever: How the Constitution Threatens the United States” (Liveright), and the difficulty of amending the Constitution is Exhibit A. “The framers of the Constitution went too far in preventing amendments,” he now argues. As a result, we are stuck with a set of rules which not only makes addressing political problems harder but is itself responsible for many of the political problems we need to address. The Constitution’s “very existence as a largely unchanged document has become a sledgehammer wielded by a minority to prop up a system that engenders polarization and festering national discord,” he says. Chemerinsky doesn’t just want to amend the Constitution, either. He wants us to throw it out and come up with a new one.

Is It Time to Torch the Constitution?

Some scholars say that it’s to blame for our political dysfunction—and that we need to start over.

www.newyorker.com

Try to get the story right next time, cuck.

GASLIGHT ALERT

 

[lafayette]

GASLIGHT ALERT

 

[Independent thinker]

New Yorker Says It's Time to Torch the Constitution ​

(but Donald Trump's the Dictator)​

New Yorker Says It's Time to Torch the Constitution (but Donald Trump's the Dictator)

twitchy.com

30 Sep 2024 ~~ By Amy Curtis

When the Left tells you who they are, believe them. John Kerry said the First Amendment is a 'roadblock' to instituting their agenda, and needs to be curtailed to stop 'misinformation' and build a 'consensus'. This is their way of saying you'll either agree with the Leftist agenda or they'll shut you up and punish you.
So much freedom, though.
Obama called the Constitution a barrier.
It's a theme.
Here's The New Yorker calling for the torching of the Constitution:

​

Wow.
Abandoned the Constitution.
They actually said it.
~Snip~
They want to destroy America. And this is how they planned to do it.

​

Commentary:
It has been a pillar of "Progressive" ideology, since turn of the 20th Century that the Constitution is outdated and a barrier to "Progress". From Woodrow Wilson, a foremost archetict of "Progressivism" (before and after he became President", written in 1897

Applied in a democratic state, such doctrine sounds radical, but not revolutionary. It is only an acceptance of the extremest logical conclusions deducible from democratic principles long ago received as respectable. For it is very clear that in fundamental theory socialism and democracy are almost if not quite one and the same. They both rest at bottom upon the absolute right of the community to determine its own destiny and that of its members. Men as communities are supreme over men as individuals. Limits of wisdom and convenience to the public control there may be: limits of principle there are, upon strict analysis, none. ​

— Woodrow Wilson, Socialism and Democracy, 1887​

This analysis is against the whole structure of the Constitution as limiting the power of the state; No Bill of Rights; No Federalism; No balancing of state power against federal power;
No protection of individuals against the power of the government.
The Neo-Marxist Left will be emboldened at some point to begin (or rather ramp up severely) violating constitutional rights- regardless of what the SC rules- There are 1000’s of peaceful people who have been arrested, imprisoned, and sent to solitary for years who did nothing wrong- worse is coming it seems-
Obama's "Fundamental Transformation of America"and destruction of the U.S. Constitution including it's Amendements continues.

Democrats have never cared about the Constitution. Mob rule is what they want.

 

[SeaMajor7]

The subverted demented LEFT are frustrated as to getting around this pesky Constitution.
These neo-Marxists apparently forget that MASS-MURDER is required to establish communist regimes.
With big-pharma and the "vaccination" cabal, perhaps they haven't forgotten after all....

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Looks like the communists are complaining that the Constitution makes it hard to change the republic into a communist tyranny.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

louis menand is a delusional totalitarian crackpot