“No Legal Need for It”: Jack Smith’s Hit Piece Against Trump Serves No Purpose Other Than to Influence the Election

[excalibur]

Which I have already said in several threads here on this board.

Look, this is pure election interference on the part of a Commie named judge Chutkan (she is foreign born, her family had numerous Communists in it).

Judge in Trump Jan. 6 case is scion of Marxist revolutionaries

The judge assigned to former President Trump’s multiple indictments stemming from his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election is the scion of a family of revolutionary Marxists in …

nypost.com

And naturally the leftoid media is far more interested in this release than the death and destruction of Hurricane Helene and the poor showing of Federal response.

​

Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy accused special counsel Jack Smith Thursday of tainting a potential jury pool with the release of a brief tied to the federal election interference case against former President Donald Trump.​

​

United States District Judge Tanya Chutkan of the District of Columbia released Smith’s brief, which sought to address the Supreme Court’s July 1 ruling regarding presidential immunity in the election interference case, Wednesday evening over the objection of Trump’s attorneys. McCarthy said that most judges would have expressed concerns over the effects the release of the brief would have on potential jurors.​

​

“The point of this was to try to get this information, which has been hashed out again and again before the American people. None of this is new, but the idea was to get the evidence out in as spectacular a way as possible. And by Smith’s light, hopefully get Trump convicted in the run-up to the election in hopes of influencing the outcome of the election. And now we have the release of this book-length size recitation of Smith’s case under circumstances where there is no possibility of having this trial before November and there was no reason to have it brought out in public now.”​

​

“In fact, in most cases, a judge would be concerned about, for example, poisoning or prejudicing against the defendant a jury pool. In most cases a judge would be very concerned that evidence not be broadcast in public without the usual due process cautions that go on in a trial that the defendant be presumed innocent, the fact that allegations are not evidence of anything,” McCarthy continued. “The point of releasing this now can only be to affect the election. There is no legal need for it.”​

​

...​

"No Legal Need for It": Jack Smith's Hit Piece Against Trump Serves No Purpose Other Than to Influence the Election - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (DCNF)—Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy accused special counsel Jack Smith Thursday of tainting a potential jury pool with the release of a brief tied to the federal election interference case against former President Donald...

thelibertydaily.com

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

An opinion piece that is just "so what."

If SCOTUS can do it, so can Judge Jack.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The three branches of government are the Executive, which is the President and administration, the Legislative, which is Congress and Judicial which is SCOTUS, meaning they are EQUAL with the president. Judge Jack is not.

 

[rampart]

Which I have already said in several threads here on this board.

Look, this is pure election interference on the part of a Commie named judge Chutkan (she is foreign born, her family had numerous Communists in it).

Judge in Trump Jan. 6 case is scion of Marxist revolutionaries

The judge assigned to former President Trump’s multiple indictments stemming from his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election is the scion of a family of revolutionary Marxists in …

nypost.com

And naturally the leftoid media is far more interested in this release than the death and destruction of Hurricane Helene and the poor showing of Federal response.

​

Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy accused special counsel Jack Smith Thursday of tainting a potential jury pool with the release of a brief tied to the federal election interference case against former President Donald Trump.​

​

United States District Judge Tanya Chutkan of the District of Columbia released Smith’s brief, which sought to address the Supreme Court’s July 1 ruling regarding presidential immunity in the election interference case, Wednesday evening over the objection of Trump’s attorneys. McCarthy said that most judges would have expressed concerns over the effects the release of the brief would have on potential jurors.​

​

“The point of this was to try to get this information, which has been hashed out again and again before the American people. None of this is new, but the idea was to get the evidence out in as spectacular a way as possible. And by Smith’s light, hopefully get Trump convicted in the run-up to the election in hopes of influencing the outcome of the election. And now we have the release of this book-length size recitation of Smith’s case under circumstances where there is no possibility of having this trial before November and there was no reason to have it brought out in public now.”​

​

“In fact, in most cases, a judge would be concerned about, for example, poisoning or prejudicing against the defendant a jury pool. In most cases a judge would be very concerned that evidence not be broadcast in public without the usual due process cautions that go on in a trial that the defendant be presumed innocent, the fact that allegations are not evidence of anything,” McCarthy continued. “The point of releasing this now can only be to affect the election. There is no legal need for it.”​

​

...​

"No Legal Need for It": Jack Smith's Hit Piece Against Trump Serves No Purpose Other Than to Influence the Election - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (DCNF)—Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy accused special counsel Jack Smith Thursday of tainting a potential jury pool with the release of a brief tied to the federal election interference case against former President Donald...

thelibertydaily.com

smith is following the supreme court instructions in trump vs usa. any timing issues could have been resolved by a more competent defense team.
\
\"be careful what you ask for. you just might get it. " vonnegut

 

[excalibur]

smith is following the supreme court instructions in trump vs usa. any timing issues could have been resolved by a more competent defense team.
\
\"be careful what you ask for. you just might get it. " vonnegut

Wrong. It is the Marxist hack Chutkan, who has rued in favor of Jack Smith almost 100% of the time.

Try reading the OP for a better understanding. Reading is fundamental.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Define 'marxist,' incel excalibur.