🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Sep 25, 2011
63,590
16,767
2,220
More lies from the people that want to give us a central planning economy and a jack booted government all in the name of protecting Mother Earth..

Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

Another week, another study showing that our official climate data gatekeepers have been exaggerating the extent of “global warming” to make it look more scary, more urgent, more desperately in need of extra funding for our official climate data gatekeepers…
This one, co-authored by meteorologist Anthony Watts (of Watts Up With That?fame) shows that at least half of the “global warming” in the US since 1979 has been fabricated by NOAA.

While satellite records have shown no global warming for at least 18 years, the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.

One reason for this discrepancy, the study suggests, is that NOAA has been cherry-picking its raw data. That is, it has ignored the evidence from those weather stations showing little or no late Twentieth century warming and instead placed undue emphasis on the ones thatdo show warming.
 
I LOVE Global Warming, going to be 72 degrees in NYC on Christmas eve...10 degrees higher than the old record!...Of course they don't mention that a huge, stagnant HIGH is off the East coast and the JET STREAM is bringing up all the warm air from Florida!
 
I LOVE Global Warming, going to be 72 degrees in NYC on Christmas eve...10 degrees higher than the old record!...Of course they don't mention that a huge, stagnant HIGH is off the East coast and the JET STREAM is bringing up all the warm air from Florida!
And dont forget EHL NEENYO!

roflmao
 
More lies from the people that want to give us a central planning economy and a jack booted government all in the name of protecting Mother Earth..

Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

Another week, another study showing that our official climate data gatekeepers have been exaggerating the extent of “global warming” to make it look more scary, more urgent, more desperately in need of extra funding for our official climate data gatekeepers…
This one, co-authored by meteorologist Anthony Watts (of Watts Up With That?fame) shows that at least half of the “global warming” in the US since 1979 has been fabricated by NOAA.

While satellite records have shown no global warming for at least 18 years, the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.

One reason for this discrepancy, the study suggests, is that NOAA has been cherry-picking its raw data. That is, it has ignored the evidence from those weather stations showing little or no late Twentieth century warming and instead placed undue emphasis on the ones thatdo show warming.
Anthony Watts is not a meteorologist, he has no science degree, period. He was a TV meteorologist before they started hiring people that actually new something.
 
More lies from the people that want to give us a central planning economy and a jack booted government all in the name of protecting Mother Earth..

Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

Another week, another study showing that our official climate data gatekeepers have been exaggerating the extent of “global warming” to make it look more scary, more urgent, more desperately in need of extra funding for our official climate data gatekeepers…
This one, co-authored by meteorologist Anthony Watts (of Watts Up With That?fame) shows that at least half of the “global warming” in the US since 1979 has been fabricated by NOAA.

While satellite records have shown no global warming for at least 18 years, the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.

One reason for this discrepancy, the study suggests, is that NOAA has been cherry-picking its raw data. That is, it has ignored the evidence from those weather stations showing little or no late Twentieth century warming and instead placed undue emphasis on the ones thatdo show warming.
Anthony Watts is not a meteorologist, he has no science degree, period. He was a TV meteorologist before they started hiring people that actually new something.
And yet he has twice corrected NASA's errors on temperatures.

Why are you libtards so fucking stupid you cannot grasp the meaning of 'ad hominem'?
 
More lies from the people that want to give us a central planning economy and a jack booted government all in the name of protecting Mother Earth..

Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

Another week, another study showing that our official climate data gatekeepers have been exaggerating the extent of “global warming” to make it look more scary, more urgent, more desperately in need of extra funding for our official climate data gatekeepers…
This one, co-authored by meteorologist Anthony Watts (of Watts Up With That?fame) shows that at least half of the “global warming” in the US since 1979 has been fabricated by NOAA.

While satellite records have shown no global warming for at least 18 years, the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.

One reason for this discrepancy, the study suggests, is that NOAA has been cherry-picking its raw data. That is, it has ignored the evidence from those weather stations showing little or no late Twentieth century warming and instead placed undue emphasis on the ones thatdo show warming.
Briebart? Why don't you post from the Weekly Globe. Same degree of accuracy.
 
Shocking! Clearly, some of us are not producing nearly enough CO2!
 
More lies from the people that want to give us a central planning economy and a jack booted government all in the name of protecting Mother Earth..

Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

Another week, another study showing that our official climate data gatekeepers have been exaggerating the extent of “global warming” to make it look more scary, more urgent, more desperately in need of extra funding for our official climate data gatekeepers…
This one, co-authored by meteorologist Anthony Watts (of Watts Up With That?fame) shows that at least half of the “global warming” in the US since 1979 has been fabricated by NOAA.

While satellite records have shown no global warming for at least 18 years, the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.

One reason for this discrepancy, the study suggests, is that NOAA has been cherry-picking its raw data. That is, it has ignored the evidence from those weather stations showing little or no late Twentieth century warming and instead placed undue emphasis on the ones thatdo show warming.
Anthony Watts is not a meteorologist, he has no science degree, period. He was a TV meteorologist before they started hiring people that actually new something.
And yet he has twice corrected NASA's errors on temperatures.

Why are you libtards so fucking stupid you cannot grasp the meaning of 'ad hominem'?
Link to a reputable source for that?
 
More lies from the people that want to give us a central planning economy and a jack booted government all in the name of protecting Mother Earth..

Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

Another week, another study showing that our official climate data gatekeepers have been exaggerating the extent of “global warming” to make it look more scary, more urgent, more desperately in need of extra funding for our official climate data gatekeepers…
This one, co-authored by meteorologist Anthony Watts (of Watts Up With That?fame) shows that at least half of the “global warming” in the US since 1979 has been fabricated by NOAA.

While satellite records have shown no global warming for at least 18 years, the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.

One reason for this discrepancy, the study suggests, is that NOAA has been cherry-picking its raw data. That is, it has ignored the evidence from those weather stations showing little or no late Twentieth century warming and instead placed undue emphasis on the ones thatdo show warming.
Has anyone ever considered that the NOAA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics could have gotten their global temperatures mixed up with the unemployment rate? Stranger things have happened in DC.
 
More lies from the people that want to give us a central planning economy and a jack booted government all in the name of protecting Mother Earth..

Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

Another week, another study showing that our official climate data gatekeepers have been exaggerating the extent of “global warming” to make it look more scary, more urgent, more desperately in need of extra funding for our official climate data gatekeepers…
This one, co-authored by meteorologist Anthony Watts (of Watts Up With That?fame) shows that at least half of the “global warming” in the US since 1979 has been fabricated by NOAA.

While satellite records have shown no global warming for at least 18 years, the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.

One reason for this discrepancy, the study suggests, is that NOAA has been cherry-picking its raw data. That is, it has ignored the evidence from those weather stations showing little or no late Twentieth century warming and instead placed undue emphasis on the ones thatdo show warming.
Has anyone ever considered that the NOAA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics could have gotten their global temperatures mixed up with the unemployment rate? Stranger things have happened in DC.
Ever considered actually researching anything at all?
 
And 194 nations just signed a document that states you are incredibly stupid.

No, they didnt, you fucking liar.

They signed a statement that said, 'If Western nations want to give us billions of US dollars for pretending to sign this thing and mean it; HELL YEAH!'
 
Shocking! Clearly, some of us are not producing nearly enough CO2!
And 194 nations just signed a document that states you are incredibly stupid.

A non-binding bit of pulp used as the justification for a bunch of bureaucrat drones to Party On Dude in Paris for a fortnight....

Just sayin'.
 
Just saying doesn't make it so. And the President got what he asked for to implement our part of that treaty in the budget passed by Congress.
 
More lies from the people that want to give us a central planning economy and a jack booted government all in the name of protecting Mother Earth..

Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

Another week, another study showing that our official climate data gatekeepers have been exaggerating the extent of “global warming” to make it look more scary, more urgent, more desperately in need of extra funding for our official climate data gatekeepers…
This one, co-authored by meteorologist Anthony Watts (of Watts Up With That?fame) shows that at least half of the “global warming” in the US since 1979 has been fabricated by NOAA.

While satellite records have shown no global warming for at least 18 years, the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.

One reason for this discrepancy, the study suggests, is that NOAA has been cherry-picking its raw data. That is, it has ignored the evidence from those weather stations showing little or no late Twentieth century warming and instead placed undue emphasis on the ones thatdo show warming.
Has anyone ever considered that the NOAA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics could have gotten their global temperatures mixed up with the unemployment rate? Stranger things have happened in DC.
Ever considered actually researching anything at all?
Nah, we'll let you do the research, Captain Knowledge. Submit a report every day at 9AM.
 
Just saying doesn't make it so. And the President got what he asked for to implement our part of that treaty in the budget passed by Congress.


Your picture must illustrate the definition of Gullible.
 
More lies from the people that want to give us a central planning economy and a jack booted government all in the name of protecting Mother Earth..

Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

Another week, another study showing that our official climate data gatekeepers have been exaggerating the extent of “global warming” to make it look more scary, more urgent, more desperately in need of extra funding for our official climate data gatekeepers…
This one, co-authored by meteorologist Anthony Watts (of Watts Up With That?fame) shows that at least half of the “global warming” in the US since 1979 has been fabricated by NOAA.

While satellite records have shown no global warming for at least 18 years, the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.

One reason for this discrepancy, the study suggests, is that NOAA has been cherry-picking its raw data. That is, it has ignored the evidence from those weather stations showing little or no late Twentieth century warming and instead placed undue emphasis on the ones thatdo show warming.
Has anyone ever considered that the NOAA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics could have gotten their global temperatures mixed up with the unemployment rate? Stranger things have happened in DC.
Ever considered actually researching anything at all?
Nah, we'll let you do the research, Captain Knowledge. Submit a report every day at 9AM.
Why not one right now, ol' Hoss.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

A site from the American Institute of Physics, the largest Scientific Society in the world.
 
Just saying doesn't make it so. And the President got what he asked for to implement our part of that treaty in the budget passed by Congress.
which proves nothing more than what idiots the GOP cuckservative leaders are.
 

Forum List

Back
Top