TyroneSlothrop
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #101
Do you think that trying divine OPINION from shuffling academic papers around
I am pretty sure only you are wise enough informed enough and Scientific enough to know truth....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you think that trying divine OPINION from shuffling academic papers around
I am not into Gish Galloping with wing nuts sorry bro...ask your multipliers question when they are giving you the Nobel Prize ...any day now your absolute genius will be recognized..Do ALL these scientists agree on what the MULTIPLIERS are? Nope. /QUOTE]
.
The Mainau Declaration 2015 on Climate Change The Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings
I can see why Billy is melting down. 36 Nobel laureates for, and only one against. That even beats 97%.
Giaver, the sole dissenter, is 86 years old. His climate science just stinks, the same dumb denier fallacies that have been debunked so many times. It's hilarious how the best the deniers can do now is getting one senile scientist on their side. They're actually bragging about it. I guess when that's all you've got, you have to fixate on it.
But...but...but...consensus...settled science!
Figure 3: Distribution of the number of researchers convinced by the evidence ofanthropogenicclimate change(green) and unconvinced by the evidence (red) with a given number of totalclimatepublications(Anderegg 2010).
Cook Et Al is a perfect example of the lie. Cook took all papers written on the subject (11,964 to be exact) threw out all but 74 (because they did not conform to his agenda) and then claimed that only 3 papers dissented. Giving him his 97% number.The meme that 97% of scientists support AGW is a lie.
Why not?
prove its a lie right now ...prove it....you are just another drooler prove that scientist are on your side of this issue asshole
In the scientific field of climate studies – which is informed by many different disciplines – the consensus is demonstrated by the number of scientists who have stopped arguing about what is causing climate change– and that’s nearly all of them. A survey of 928 peer-reviewed abstracts on the subject 'global climate change' published between 1993 and 2003 shows that not a single paper rejected the consensus position that global warming is man caused(Oreskes 2004).
Facts are facts and you have none.
Fact number one
Heartland Institute has Zero Scientific credibility
Fact Number two
your big scientist expert has never ever written any papers on Climate ...never
Fact number 3...Consensus
I have presented links showing that a survey of Climate Scientific papers has shown no papers presented denying Climate change
Fact Number Four
The Japanese Meteorological Agency'
The UK Meteorological Agency
NASA and NOAA in the US
97 percent of Climate Scientist
Pope Francis
all agree with me
For you Right winger the word "anthropogenic" means caused by folk's activities...us humans
Of more than 4,000 academic papers published over 20 years, 97.1% agreed that climate change is anthropogenic
Climate research nearly unanimous on human causes survey finds Environment The Guardian
In the latest volley, from Legates et al 2013, John Cook’s “97% consensus” survey has become the case study in agnotology. Based on incorrect results, a flawed method, and a logical fallacy, it kept key facts hidden while sloppily blending vague language into a form that is easily and actively misinterpreted. That it passed peer-review is another damning indictment of peer review.
Cook still refuses to provide about half the data, but the data that has been made public shows (after some digging) that a mere 41 papers out of 12,000 was called a 97% consensus. The trick is that Cook et al interchangeably use different definitions of consensus.
As you can not refute his science with logic and cognitive thought why dont you go play with yourself..
Global surface temperature estimates from NASA GISS.
The latest global temperature data are breaking records
LOL look at the list of Agencies in consensus with MeGlobal surface temperature estimates from NASA GISS.
The latest global temperature data are breaking records
You use the same altered and manufactured data Old Fraud uses..
what are you posting goofy.....Global surface temperature estimates from NASA GISS.
The latest global temperature data are breaking records
You use the same altered and manufactured data Old Fraud uses..
I am not into Gish Galloping with wing nuts sorry bro...ask your multipliers question when they are giving you the Nobel Prize ...any day now your absolute genius will be recognized..Do ALL these scientists agree on what the MULTIPLIERS are? Nope. /QUOTE]
.
So in other words, you are yet another partisan spinster with NO INTEREST in any aspect of the theory you support. Where DID those projections of 6 or 8 degC rise by 2100 come from? When were they made, and what are they TODAY... Fuck your oil company conspiracy theory. The Warmers have pretty much destroyed themselves with their exaggerated claims and screwing with open scientific process. Didn't NEED Exxon money to FAIL at VIRTUALLY EVERY PREDICTION they've made -- in just 3 decades. No more accurate than Nobel Prize winner Al Gore on the topic.. Smarter? Sure -- but they got on a gravy train of unlimited money for anything Global Warming and HAD to Exaggerate to make the sponsors happy..
Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus
AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2
SCIENCE ACADEMIES
American Association for the Advancement of Science
"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)3
American Chemical Society
"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)4
American Geophysical Union
"Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5
American Medical Association
"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2013)6
American Meteorological Society
"It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7
American Physical Society
"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8
The Geological Society of America
"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9
International academies: Joint statement
"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
U.S. National Academy of Sciences
"The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify taking steps to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere." (2005)11
INTERGOVERNMENTAL BODIES
U.S. Global Change Research Program
"The global warming of the past 50 years is due primarily to human-induced increases in heat-trapping gases. Human 'fingerprints' also have been identified in many other aspects of the climate system, including changes in ocean heat content, precipitation, atmospheric moisture, and Arctic sea ice." (2009, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12
OTHER RESOURCES
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
“Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.”13
“Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely* due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.”14
*IPCC defines ‘very likely’ as greater than 90 percent probability of occurrence.
List of worldwide scientific organizations
The following page lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.
Office of Planning and Research - List of Organizations
U.S. agencies
The following page contains information on what federal agencies are doing to adapt to climate change.
http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/federal-agencies-adaptation.pdf
The AGU is a prime example of the "controlling body" being out of touch with reality and those whom they represent.
As you can not refute his science with logic and cognitive thought why dont you go play with yourself..
Pull yourself together man you are hysterical...
Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus
Temperature data from four international science institutions. All show rapid warming in the past few decades and that the last decade has been the warmest on record.
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.
From the link........
Giaever said his climate research was eye opening. “I was horrified by what I found” after researching the issue in 2012, he noted.
“Global warming really has become a new religion. Because you cannot discuss it. It’s not proper. It is like the Catholic Church.”