Nothing generates unemployment like liberal policy

[P@triot]

Corporate welfare?

Yes...the left did that as well. Barack Insane Obama "bailed out" GM. Then he "bailed out" Chrysler. Then he "bailed out" Wall Street. And through out - he threw billions at his buddies like Solyndra ($500 million alone) which still went out of business. Not sure why you progressives applauded all of that "corporate welfare" but you guys did.

Keep working on it and you might even come to one of the core beliefs of liberalism.

We just did snowflake - that core belief is called hypocrisy. Boo when you've been duped into believing that conservatives are engaging in "corporate welfare", cheer loudly when progressives are actually engaging in corporate welfare.

Thanks for stopping by, Reg!

 

[danielpalos]

Corporate welfare?

Yes...the left did that as well. Barack Insane Obama "bailed out" GM. Then he "bailed out" Chrysler. Then he "bailed out" Wall Street. And throughout - he threw billions at his buddies like Solyndra ($500 million alone) which still went out of business. Not sure why you progressives applauded all of that "corporate welfare" but you guys did.

Because it promotes the general welfare; y'all cannot even repeal the drug war.

 

[P@triot]

Corporate welfare?

Yes...the left did that as well. Barack Insane Obama "bailed out" GM. Then he "bailed out" Chrysler. Then he "bailed out" Wall Street. And throughout - he threw billions at his buddies like Solyndra ($500 million alone) which still went out of business. Not sure why you progressives applauded all of that "corporate welfare" but you guys did.

Because it promotes the general welfare

Then why the fuck do you guys cry about "corporate welfare" if it "promotes the general welfare". You contradict yourselves.

 

[P@triot]

Nothing generates unemployment like failed left-wing policy...

 

[danielpalos]

Corporate welfare?

Yes...the left did that as well. Barack Insane Obama "bailed out" GM. Then he "bailed out" Chrysler. Then he "bailed out" Wall Street. And throughout - he threw billions at his buddies like Solyndra ($500 million alone) which still went out of business. Not sure why you progressives applauded all of that "corporate welfare" but you guys did.

Because it promotes the general welfare

Then why the fuck do you guys cry about "corporate welfare" if it "promotes the general welfare". You contradict yourselves.

The general welfare includes not Only the general corporate welfare, but also that of Individuals exercising their Liberty. The right wing prefers to "hate on the poor" and not the "corporate rich".

 

[P@triot]

Corporate welfare?

Yes...the left did that as well. Barack Insane Obama "bailed out" GM. Then he "bailed out" Chrysler. Then he "bailed out" Wall Street. And throughout - he threw billions at his buddies like Solyndra ($500 million alone) which still went out of business. Not sure why you progressives applauded all of that "corporate welfare" but you guys did.

Because it promotes the general welfare

Then why the fuck do you guys cry about "corporate welfare" if it "promotes the general welfare". You contradict yourselves.

The general welfare includes not Only the general corporate welfare, but also that of Individuals exercising their Liberty. The right wing prefers to "hate on the poor" and not the "corporate rich".

You're not answering the question. Stop running from it, be a man, stand up, and answer it. If "corporate welfare" is constitutional and it "promotes the general welfare" as you claim - then why does the left throw tantrums about all the time?!?

 

[danielpalos]

I did answer the question; too difficult for red herring specialists?

 

[P@triot]

I did answer the question; too difficult for red herring specialists?

Now you're so afraid of the question that you won't even respond to the posts because others will be able to see it. Game. Set. Match.

 

[P@triot]

Nothing generates unemployment like failed left wing policy...

• The board of trustees announced that Mills is currently running a $9 million yearly operating deficit.

• The $9 million shortfall is about 16% of the school’s 2017 budget of $57 million.

• The budgetary crisis will cause professors and administrators to lose their jobs, trustees said.

This is what happens when one ignores science, biology, and reason for a bizarre ideology.

First Women's College To Admit Transgender Dudes Declares Financial Emergency

 

[danielpalos]

I did answer the question; too difficult for red herring specialists?

Now you're so afraid of the question that you won't even respond to the posts because others will be able to see it. Game. Set. Match.

This is the answer, red herring specialist.

The general welfare includes not Only the general corporate welfare, but also that of Individuals exercising their Liberty. The right wing prefers to "hate on the poor" and not the "corporate rich".

 

[Ima Cat]

There's coal miners and there's Goldman Sachs anointed ones. And then theres them flipping burgers or doing yard work below minimum. Embrace it, morons!

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing generates unemployment like failed left wing policy...

• The board of trustees announced that Mills is currently running a $9 million yearly operating deficit.

• The $9 million shortfall is about 16% of the school’s 2017 budget of $57 million.

• The budgetary crisis will cause professors and administrators to lose their jobs, trustees said.

This is what happens when one ignores science, biology, and reason for a bizarre ideology.

First Women's College To Admit Transgender Dudes Declares Financial Emergency

Just wo-men demonstrating their lack of superior money management skills.

In 1990, in the midst of declining enrollment and financial struggles, officials at Mills attempted to admit males of any variety. However, after over 300 angry students held a two-week strike, alumnae created a — now apparently failed — financial plan to preserve the status of Mills as a women’s college, The Associated Press reported at the time.

 

[P@triot]

Just wo-men demonstrating their lack of superior money management skills.

Wow...look at the left-wing misogynist pig proclaiming that women have "inferior money management skills". Typical of that side of the aisle.

 

[danielpalos]

Just wo-men demonstrating their lack of superior money management skills.

Wow...look at the left-wing misogynist pig proclaiming that women have "inferior money management skills". Typical of that side of the aisle.

However, after over 300 angry students held a two-week strike, alumnae created a — now apparently failed — financial plan to preserve the status of Mills as a women’s college, The Associated Press reported at the time.

 

[P@triot]

Just wo-men demonstrating their lack of superior money management skills.

Wow...look at the left-wing misogynist pig proclaiming that women have "inferior money management skills". Typical of that side of the aisle.

However, after over 300 angry students held a two-week strike, alumnae created a — now apparently failed — financial plan to preserve the status of Mills as a women’s college, The Associated Press reported at the time.

The Associated Press did not say "Just wo-men demonstrating their lack of superior money management skills" - you did.

Typical left-wing misogynist pig. Intimated by women - needs to attack them and try to make them feel inferior.

 

[danielpalos]

Just wo-men demonstrating their lack of superior money management skills.

Wow...look at the left-wing misogynist pig proclaiming that women have "inferior money management skills". Typical of that side of the aisle.

However, after over 300 angry students held a two-week strike, alumnae created a — now apparently failed — financial plan to preserve the status of Mills as a women’s college, The Associated Press reported at the time.

The Associated Press did not say "Just wo-men demonstrating their lack of superior money management skills" - you did.

Typical left-wing misogynist pig. Intimated by women - needs to attack them and try to make them feel inferior.

Men try harder to succeed.

now apparently failed

 

[P@triot]

Just wo-men demonstrating their lack of superior money management skills.

Wow...look at the left-wing misogynist pig proclaiming that women have "inferior money management skills". Typical of that side of the aisle.

However, after over 300 angry students held a two-week strike, alumnae created a — now apparently failed — financial plan to preserve the status of Mills as a women’s college, The Associated Press reported at the time.

The Associated Press did not say "Just wo-men demonstrating their lack of superior money management skills" - you did.

Typical left-wing misogynist pig. Intimated by women - needs to attack them and try to make them feel inferior.

Men try harder to succeed.

And the misogynist pig doubles-down on his message. The left-wing War on Women is alive and well.

 

[danielpalos]

Just wo-men demonstrating their lack of superior money management skills.

Wow...look at the left-wing misogynist pig proclaiming that women have "inferior money management skills". Typical of that side of the aisle.

However, after over 300 angry students held a two-week strike, alumnae created a — now apparently failed — financial plan to preserve the status of Mills as a women’s college, The Associated Press reported at the time.

The Associated Press did not say "Just wo-men demonstrating their lack of superior money management skills" - you did.

Typical left-wing misogynist pig. Intimated by women - needs to attack them and try to make them feel inferior.

Men try harder to succeed.

And the misogynist pig doubles-down on his message. The left-wing War on Women is alive and well.

It is about equality. If women can have "gangs of guys coddle them into it", then so should guys have gangs of women, coddle them into it.

 

[P@triot]

It is about equality. If women can have "gangs of guys coddle them into it", then so should guys have gangs of women, coddle them into it.

With your despicable attitude towards women, you'll never get a single woman to "coddle" you into anything - much less "gangs" of them.

 

[danielpalos]

It is about equality. If women can have "gangs of guys coddle them into it", then so should guys have gangs of women, coddle them into it.

With your despicable attitude towards women, you'll never get a single woman to "coddle" you into anything - much less "gangs" of them.

only, slacker free chics, say that.

it is why i love, ambitious and proactive women, when i can afford to establish petty cash funds for such purposes.