now whoopie wants the briotuish royals to kiss blacks asses

[gtopa1]

I'm not "guessing," on shit.

I know why the Council on Foreign Relations exists, it is a satellite of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. And I know why the UN exists, to do the bidding of the crown and those aforementioned organizations. Did you even bother watching that documentary in post number #2 before you started commenting? It is no secret that British and American elites, before the first world war wanted to reconstruct the British Empire, if not in name, then as a defacto ruling entity.

Shit, that is basically what has propelled all foreign policy for the past century. Only a neophyte denies it.

When they denied Russia entry into NATO, and then continued to expand it. . . what did everyone THINK was going to happen? They knew, exactly what the crown intended.

. . . it is no wonder these folks are going to be able to reduce the world's population by 5 or 6 billion. . . Y'all are like faithful dogs. You worship those who are trying to kill you, everyone, no matter the party, nor the nation. And they throw it in your face and mock you to boot.

Bollocks!!! The Council is a bloody think tank. May be doing good for all I know but if they're advising biden they're either shit or he ain't listening!!! Overblown Yanks imo.

lmao

"In 2019, it was criticized for accepting a donation from Len Blavatnik, a Ukrainian-born English billionaire with close links to Vladimir Putin."

Frankly who cares?? Meh; how much are they giving Hunter?

Can't see any Crowned Heads of Europe among the members.

Greg

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The thing about angry racist such as Whoopi Goldberg, there is nothing that anyone can to do satisfy her hate.
Everyone could apologize to her, but she would still be an angry racist.
So why even bother doing it.

 

[gtopa1]

Exonerate myself from what? Your tiny intellect?



I have nothing to apologize for your short attention span, and lack of comprehension.

Nah; you're microdot focus!!!

Are There Any Benefits in Becoming a Republic?​

"There are no discernible benefits as we already have as good a system as is humanly possible to devise but the answer below will address some of the points which republicans believe.

Republicans often say: We want an Australian for head of state but in fact this is already the case. The Governor-General, appointed by the Queen on the advice of the prime minister, is the Sovereign's representative, is an Australian and, whilst in office, is effective head of state of Australia. It is important to know that once the Governor-General is appointed, the Sovereign steps back from all active engagement in day to day affairs and leaves them to the Governor-General. She is, however, regularly updated by the Governor-General's office as to what is going on and thus is aware of all the major issues affecting the country. Although the Sovereign (the Queen) appoints (and can dismiss) the Governor-General, it is always done on the advice of our prime minister.

The Queen serves the people by accepting the majority opinion (those who voted for the government and thus the prime minister) but equally protects those who did not. A monarch makes no distinction between peoples of a realm.

Republicans want Australia to be completely independent of the UK but this has definitively been the case since 1986. The UK has no involvement with Australian government at all. Australia is entirely independent. The fact that we share the body of the Queen with 15 other realms does not mean that our Crown is not independent. Yes, our history has been heavily influenced by Britain, (law and order, our parliamentary system, the checks and balances inherent within constitutional monarchy, the Christian basis of society) but these have enabled us to remain a democratic beacon to many in the world. Becoming a republic would negate much of this.

Republicans want either an elected or appointed person as president. Were Australia to follow this model then we would immediately lose all the neutrality which our monarchy gives us. The Queen, as Sovereign, is the people. She did not campaign for or influence affairs so as to gain office and thus she represents every member of society. An hereditary monarch serves all the people all the time. No republican model can come near this.

We would also lose the intangible historic link to our Founding in the late eighteenth century. It is our past which has made us the nation we are. The links connecting the past, present and future are inescapable and necessary to a country which is comfortable with itself. It is not a 'natural step', as republicans claim, to become a republic and 'close the circle'. Our monarchy contributed hugely to our past and present success and will continue to do so in the future. We are part of an ancient yet outwardly modern continuum of monarchy which has rich traditions and we are part of a family of similarly libertarian nations which although independent of each other, share the person of the Queen as their Sovereign.

Each state has its own Governor who is similarly appointed by the Sovereign but on the advice of the state premier. The States and their independence are integral to the smooth running of the Constitution. The checks and balances of monarchy apply as much at the state level as at the federal. Decentralisation makes for greater accountability. Were Australia to embrace republicanism we would gain nothing but lose much. With our system we are in the forefront of free countries in the world, most of which are monarchies. This is no coincidence. There is no better model of government for keeping ultimate power away from the unscrupulous than a resilient constitutional monarchy.

it stands to reason that if we are to remove what we have, we must replace it with a better system which is more effective in keeping politicians from abusing their position. No proposal which betters what we have has been put forward."

So in Summary; I am more than content with a system that is better FOR US than one that gives the world Biden and is so open to Leftard Corruption through a Political Party like the DemoKKKrats!!

But Hey; Physician, heal thyself!!! I'm more than happy to give you any assistance of which I am capable, limited though that be.

Are There Any Benefits in Becoming a Republic?

To educate, inform, lobby and protect the Australian Constitution

www.monarchist.org.au

Greg

 

[MisterBeale]

Bollocks!!! The Council is a bloody think tank. May be doing good for all I know but if they're advising biden they're either shit or he ain't listening!!! Overblown Yanks imo.

lmao

"In 2019, it was criticized for accepting a donation from Len Blavatnik, a Ukrainian-born English billionaire with close links to Vladimir Putin."

Frankly who cares?? Meh; how much are they giving Hunter?

Can't see any Crowned Heads of Europe among the members.

Greg

It is far, FAR more than just a think tank silly.

RULING CLASS JOURNALISTS​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1993/10/30/ruling-class-journalists/761e7bf8-025d-474e-81cb-92dcf271571e/

". . . The membership of these journalists in the council, however they may think of themselves, is an acknowledgment of their active and important role in public affairs and of their ascension into the American ruling class. They do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United States; they help make it. Their influence, Jon Vanden Heuvel speculates in an article in the Media Studies Journal, is likely to increase now that the Cold War has ended: "By focusing on particular crises around the world {the media are in a better position} to pressure government to act. ... Humanitarianism has taken on new dimensions as a component of American foreign policy, and the media are largely responsible."

http://www.pennsylvaniacrier.com/filemgmt_data/files/Ruling Class Journalists.pdf

CIA’s Mockingbirds and “Ruling Class Journalists”​

CIA’s Mockingbirds and “Ruling Class Journalists”

Via admissions against interest and Freedom of Information requests, it is well documented that many reporters publish stories at the behest of government and globalists. By William F. Jasper

thenewamerican.com

The American Empire and its Media

Largely unbeknownst to the general public, executives and top journalists of almost all major US news outlets have long been members of the influential Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

swprs.org

They are, like the Monarchy, non-partisan ruling elites. They don't give a shit about the people, only their own power.

They are propagandists.

Propaganda (1928)​

Propaganda by Edward Bernays (1928)

Dick Cheney Omitted the Fact That He Was Director of the CFR When Seeking Re-Election​

Hillary Clinton admits the CFR gives the orders​

As far as the Monarchy?

If any of the citizens in the Common-Wealth nations ever decided that it wasn't in their interest to be involved in one of Britian's wars for the Queen? TOO DAMN BAD. . . they are her slaves.

As are the Americans now apparently.

You're blind obedience to CFR & RIIA propaganda make you oblivious to your own interests. Only citizens committed to the idea of republicanism who see through government/corporate propaganda know their own interests.

You need to understand the difference between patriotism, and nationalism.

 

[MisterBeale]

Nah; you're microdot focus!!!

Are There Any Benefits in Becoming a Republic?​

"There are no discernible benefits as we already have as good a system as is humanly possible to devise but the answer below will address some of the points which republicans believe.

Republicans often say: We want an Australian for head of state but in fact this is already the case. The Governor-General, appointed by the Queen on the advice of the prime minister, is the Sovereign's representative, is an Australian and, whilst in office, is effective head of state of Australia. It is important to know that once the Governor-General is appointed, the Sovereign steps back from all active engagement in day to day affairs and leaves them to the Governor-General. She is, however, regularly updated by the Governor-General's office as to what is going on and thus is aware of all the major issues affecting the country. Although the Sovereign (the Queen) appoints (and can dismiss) the Governor-General, it is always done on the advice of our prime minister.

The Queen serves the people by accepting the majority opinion (those who voted for the government and thus the prime minister) but equally protects those who did not. A monarch makes no distinction between peoples of a realm.

Republicans want Australia to be completely independent of the UK but this has definitively been the case since 1986. The UK has no involvement with Australian government at all. Australia is entirely independent. The fact that we share the body of the Queen with 15 other realms does not mean that our Crown is not independent. Yes, our history has been heavily influenced by Britain, (law and order, our parliamentary system, the checks and balances inherent within constitutional monarchy, the Christian basis of society) but these have enabled us to remain a democratic beacon to many in the world. Becoming a republic would negate much of this.

Republicans want either an elected or appointed person as president. Were Australia to follow this model then we would immediately lose all the neutrality which our monarchy gives us. The Queen, as Sovereign, is the people. She did not campaign for or influence affairs so as to gain office and thus she represents every member of society. An hereditary monarch serves all the people all the time. No republican model can come near this.

We would also lose the intangible historic link to our Founding in the late eighteenth century. It is our past which has made us the nation we are. The links connecting the past, present and future are inescapable and necessary to a country which is comfortable with itself. It is not a 'natural step', as republicans claim, to become a republic and 'close the circle'. Our monarchy contributed hugely to our past and present success and will continue to do so in the future. We are part of an ancient yet outwardly modern continuum of monarchy which has rich traditions and we are part of a family of similarly libertarian nations which although independent of each other, share the person of the Queen as their Sovereign.

Each state has its own Governor who is similarly appointed by the Sovereign but on the advice of the state premier. The States and their independence are integral to the smooth running of the Constitution. The checks and balances of monarchy apply as much at the state level as at the federal. Decentralisation makes for greater accountability. Were Australia to embrace republicanism we would gain nothing but lose much. With our system we are in the forefront of free countries in the world, most of which are monarchies. This is no coincidence. There is no better model of government for keeping ultimate power away from the unscrupulous than a resilient constitutional monarchy.

it stands to reason that if we are to remove what we have, we must replace it with a better system which is more effective in keeping politicians from abusing their position. No proposal which betters what we have has been put forward."

So in Summary; I am more than content with a system that is better FOR US than one that gives the world Biden and is so open to Leftard Corruption through a Political Party like the DemoKKKrats!!

But Hey; Physician, heal thyself!!! I'm more than happy to give you any assistance of which I am capable, limited though that be.

Are There Any Benefits in Becoming a Republic?

To educate, inform, lobby and protect the Australian Constitution

www.monarchist.org.au

Greg

Completely unbiased source.

 

[Mindful]

Don’t push it.

Barbary slaves.

 

[horselightning]

wow this topic on stupied whoopi and gone in all directions lol

 

[MisterBeale]

wow this topic on stupied whoopi and gone in all directions lol

Maybe instead of posting OPs supporting tyrannical aristocrats. . . on a message board devoted to topics that support AMERICANS, and AMERICA. . . you should, I don't know, support Americans over Kings and Queens?

 

[MisterBeale]

Don’t push it.

Barbary slaves.

View attachment 622063

To the shores of Tripoli. . .



The monarchs of Europe didn't do shit, the marines had to do the dirty work.

 

[horselightning]

Maybe instead of posting OPs supporting tyrannical aristocrats. . . on a message board devoted to topics that support AMERICANS, and AMERICA. . . you should, I don't know, support Americans over Kings and Queens?

it waso n an american showe,. justy more whoopis racisum nad black supremacy

 

[monkrules]

she os ignorant and racist., she is digging her own hole.

PLEASE...please, please, please....

NEVER...EVER, make ANY reference to Whoopi's "hole" again.

I can already feel the nightmares beginning...Aaruuggh...