ThoughtCrimes
Old Navy Vet
Because you refuse to accept the Constitutional language merely enforces its validity, fool. Now eat shit and die!I posted it to YOU you fucking idiot in post #163, and you said it didn't make sense to you. Figures! That could be because you are either a pissant or a gadfly with head up ass! Damn but you are whacked!!!!You too damn poor to pay attention? I don't think so! You're playing dumb to have an excuse to keep from responding, you transparent, dishonest POS! I knew you were a piker from reading many of your posts to others over the last few months. Now piss off you bloody ass!I wrote;
I made three typos I see so I'll correct them;
The corrections were advice vice advise, Article II vice Article I and the first word in the second sentence was meant to be It vice I. Now to your critique of that;
With or without the corrections, your remarks make no fucking sense at all given that was what was being discussed in the first place. There was no negation as you claim in your desperation. You are the one with the difficulty of reading and understanding, obviously!
I wrote this;
To which you responded with;
IF you have read Article II § 2 Clause 2 you obviously didn't understand a word of it. Here is what I wrote to another on this thread earlier today;
When I wrote the above I didn't bother to mention the Senate Judiciary Committee rules. See Senate Rule XXV. Next time get thee edified!!!!
Please make sense so that I may respond.
Yet still I await the constitutional text that mandates granting advice and consent. Fourth request.
No, you posted the same passage you've been posting all along, which in no way obligates the Senate to provide advice and consent.
Try again.