🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Obama Gave Material Assistance To Our Taliban Enemy

Vigilante

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2014
51,327
18,076
2,290
Waiting on the Cowardly Dante!!
What was that about high crimes and MISDEMEANORS?

National Security: Federal law prohibits any person — repeat, any person — from providing material assistance to terrorists, including human assets. But that's what the president did in releasing five Taliban commanders. When iconic interviewer David Frost asked former President Nixon about the legality of his actions in the Watergate affair, Nixon said "when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal." That's an attitude seemingly shared by the current occupant of the Oval Office. As former congressman and Afghanistan veteran Allen West points out, President Obama signed into law only months ago the National Defense Authorization...

Obama Broke Law In Giving Material Assistance To Our Taliban Enemy - Investors.com
 
Last edited:
The bastard could kill his family on national television and the press would spin it in the interest of national security and Holder would agree. Prince harry would praise him for his bravery and selflessness, we are truly living in the twilight zone.
 
What was that about high crimes and MISDEMEANORS?

National Security: Federal law prohibits any person — repeat, any person — from providing material assistance to terrorists, including human assets. But that's what the president did in releasing five Taliban commanders. When iconic interviewer David Frost asked former President Nixon about the legality of his actions in the Watergate affair, Nixon said "when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal." That's an attitude seemingly shared by the current occupant of the Oval Office. As former congressman and Afghanistan veteran Allen West points out, President Obama signed into law only months ago the National Defense Authorization...

Obama Broke Law In Giving Material Assistance To Our Taliban Enemy - Investors.com

Then why was Bush not accused of the same when he paid Sunni's in Iraq to fight on our side, even after killing American troops?
 
Last edited:
Now we have 82 threads on this one subject.
We need 100 threads on the same subject. Let's make sure every thread on USMB's "Active Topics" deals with the prisoner exchange. Yeah, that's the ticket!
It was totally a stupid thing for Obama/USA to do, but all these redundant threads are just plain stupid too.
 
What was that about high crimes and MISDEMEANORS?

National Security: Federal law prohibits any person — repeat, any person — from providing material assistance to terrorists, including human assets. But that's what the president did in releasing five Taliban commanders. When iconic interviewer David Frost asked former President Nixon about the legality of his actions in the Watergate affair, Nixon said "when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal." That's an attitude seemingly shared by the current occupant of the Oval Office. As former congressman and Afghanistan veteran Allen West points out, President Obama signed into law only months ago the National Defense Authorization...

Obama Broke Law In Giving Material Assistance To Our Taliban Enemy - Investors.com

Taliban leaders are "not terrorists or revolutionaries."
Media reports documenting the Taliban's harsh, radical beliefs were "nonsense."
The Taliban would develop a "disciplined, moral society" that did not harbor terrorists.
The Taliban posed no threat to the U.S.
- Dana Rohrabacher, R-Ca
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
What was that about high crimes and MISDEMEANORS?

National Security: Federal law prohibits any person — repeat, any person — from providing material assistance to terrorists, including human assets. But that's what the president did in releasing five Taliban commanders. When iconic interviewer David Frost asked former President Nixon about the legality of his actions in the Watergate affair, Nixon said "when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal." That's an attitude seemingly shared by the current occupant of the Oval Office. As former congressman and Afghanistan veteran Allen West points out, President Obama signed into law only months ago the National Defense Authorization...

Obama Broke Law In Giving Material Assistance To Our Taliban Enemy - Investors.com

Taliban leaders are "not terrorists or revolutionaries."
Media reports documenting the Taliban's harsh, radical beliefs were "nonsense."
The Taliban would develop a "disciplined, moral society" that did not harbor terrorists.
The Taliban posed no threat to the U.S.
- Dana Rohrabacher, R-Ca


Yes, we believe Rohrabacher as much as we believe McLame, or McGrahamnesty, or for that matter, McCantor!! ...Because there's an R. after his name means SHIT to the thinking!....That leaves you out Ed!
 
Ronald Reagan + Islamic Jihad = Shut the fuck up, Republicans.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Ronald Reagan + Islamic Jihad = Shut the fuck up, Republicans.

Troll-Warning-Photo-by-Gil-300x300.jpg
 
Okay then, Ronnie Reagan gave the Iranians material support for the release of US hostages in Iran after elected. With precedent actions such as these, why is only Oblama wrong?
 
How the Left is Spinning Surrender to the Taliban

American Thinker ^


Salon editor Elias Isquith takes right-wingnuts to task in his latest piece, objectively titled “Wingnuts’ war on the troops: The ugly lesson of Bowe Bergdahl and Sarah Palin.” The article is riddled with false assertions and insanely muddled logic bent to satisfy a preferred apologist agenda, the most ridiculous example I’ve seen since David Sirota’s “Gee, I hope the Boston Bomber’s a White Guy and Not a Muslim” article from last April which, incidentally, also graced the e-leaves at Salon. But it’s yet another example exposing the extent to which entrenched media figures will commit to impossible mental somersaults to...
 
Okay then, Ronnie Reagan gave the Iranians material support for the release of US hostages in Iran after elected. With precedent actions such as these, why is only Oblama wrong?

Congressional investigation didn't think so, but you subversives can continue to look like assholes...we promise to chuckle!
 
What was that about high crimes and MISDEMEANORS?

National Security: Federal law prohibits any person — repeat, any person — from providing material assistance to terrorists, including human assets. But that's what the president did in releasing five Taliban commanders. When iconic interviewer David Frost asked former President Nixon about the legality of his actions in the Watergate affair, Nixon said "when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal." That's an attitude seemingly shared by the current occupant of the Oval Office. As former congressman and Afghanistan veteran Allen West points out, President Obama signed into law only months ago the National Defense Authorization...

Obama Broke Law In Giving Material Assistance To Our Taliban Enemy - Investors.com

Taliban leaders are "not terrorists or revolutionaries."
Media reports documenting the Taliban's harsh, radical beliefs were "nonsense."
The Taliban would develop a "disciplined, moral society" that did not harbor terrorists.
The Taliban posed no threat to the U.S.
- Dana Rohrabacher, R-Ca


Yes, we believe Rohrabacher as much as we believe McLame, or McGrahamnesty, or for that matter, McCantor!! ...Because there's an R. after his name means SHIT to the thinking!....That leaves you out Ed!

Rohrabacher was St Ronnie's hand picked go between for arming the terrorists with shoulder mounted missiles, like OBL, who Rohrabacher met with personally.
 
How the Left is Spinning Surrender to the Taliban

American Thinker ^


Salon editor Elias Isquith takes right-wingnuts to task in his latest piece, objectively titled “Wingnuts’ war on the troops: The ugly lesson of Bowe Bergdahl and Sarah Palin.” The article is riddled with false assertions and insanely muddled logic bent to satisfy a preferred apologist agenda, the most ridiculous example I’ve seen since David Sirota’s “Gee, I hope the Boston Bomber’s a White Guy and Not a Muslim” article from last April which, incidentally, also graced the e-leaves at Salon. But it’s yet another example exposing the extent to which entrenched media figures will commit to impossible mental somersaults to...

American Stinker NEVER tells the truth. :eusa_liar:
 
Taliban leaders are "not terrorists or revolutionaries."
Media reports documenting the Taliban's harsh, radical beliefs were "nonsense."
The Taliban would develop a "disciplined, moral society" that did not harbor terrorists.
The Taliban posed no threat to the U.S.
- Dana Rohrabacher, R-Ca


Yes, we believe Rohrabacher as much as we believe McLame, or McGrahamnesty, or for that matter, McCantor!! ...Because there's an R. after his name means SHIT to the thinking!....That leaves you out Ed!

Rohrabacher was St Ronnie's hand picked go between for arming the terrorists with shoulder mounted missiles, like OBL, who Rohrabacher met with personally.

Yes, the Taliban WAS getting assistance FIGHTING THE RUSSIAN'S from us! Nice try Eddy, you failed again! :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::eusa_clap:
 
How the Left is Spinning Surrender to the Taliban

American Thinker ^


Salon editor Elias Isquith takes right-wingnuts to task in his latest piece, objectively titled “Wingnuts’ war on the troops: The ugly lesson of Bowe Bergdahl and Sarah Palin.” The article is riddled with false assertions and insanely muddled logic bent to satisfy a preferred apologist agenda, the most ridiculous example I’ve seen since David Sirota’s “Gee, I hope the Boston Bomber’s a White Guy and Not a Muslim” article from last April which, incidentally, also graced the e-leaves at Salon. But it’s yet another example exposing the extent to which entrenched media figures will commit to impossible mental somersaults to...

American Stinker NEVER tells the truth. :eusa_liar:

You NEVER tell the truth as I've exposed in this thread alone! You're a liar, and a fool! :cuckoo::cuckoo::eusa_boohoo:
 
Yes, we believe Rohrabacher as much as we believe McLame, or McGrahamnesty, or for that matter, McCantor!! ...Because there's an R. after his name means SHIT to the thinking!....That leaves you out Ed!

Rohrabacher was St Ronnie's hand picked go between for arming the terrorists with shoulder mounted missiles, like OBL, who Rohrabacher met with personally.

Yes, the Taliban WAS getting assistance FIGHTING THE RUSSIAN'S from us! Nice try Eddy, you failed again! :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::eusa_clap:

Except when Rohrabacher met with OBL he was told that OBL wanted to kill Americans as much as Russians, and St Ronnie armed him anyway!!!!!
 
Bush takes money from Lockheed Martin. If a possible war is on the brink, Lockheed puts pressure on Bush to go to war Lockheed Martin or (insert donor Corporation here) profits.

Bush starts Iraq war based on lies. We kill families, imagine yourself as part of that family and ask yourself what you would do.

These families with dead children want revenge.

People start attacking the USA, we call them terrorists. Bush starts a war against terrorists.

Obama stated he would end GITMO. But what if these people were just fathers mad about their childrens death and not actually terrorists? Obama keeps GITMO.

And to the current topic...............My guess is America has tracking bugs on the people we released. It's 2014...they probably don't even know. We gain an American soldier and track the terrorists that lead us to more terrorists.

This isn't rocket science unless you are bias and want drama.
 
Rohrabacher was St Ronnie's hand picked go between for arming the terrorists with shoulder mounted missiles, like OBL, who Rohrabacher met with personally.

Yes, the Taliban WAS getting assistance FIGHTING THE RUSSIAN'S from us! Nice try Eddy, you failed again! :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::eusa_clap:

Except when Rohrabacher met with OBL he was told that OBL wanted to kill Americans as much as Russians, and St Ronnie armed him anyway!!!!!

OBL, after being left high and dry after chasing the Russians out, had a hard on for us...not before!
 
Bush takes money from Lockheed Martin. If a possible war is on the brink, Lockheed puts pressure on Bush to go to war Lockheed Martin or (insert donor Corporation here) profits.

Bush starts Iraq war based on lies. We kill families, imagine yourself as part of that family and ask yourself what you would do.

These families with dead children want revenge.

People start attacking the USA, we call them terrorists. Bush starts a war against terrorists.

Obama stated he would end GITMO. But what if these people were just fathers mad about their childrens death and not actually terrorists? Obama keeps GITMO.

And to the current topic...............My guess is America has tracking bugs on the people we released. It's 2014...they probably don't even know. We gain an American soldier and track the terrorists that lead us to more terrorists.

This isn't rocket science unless you are bias and want drama.

:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::eusa_clap:
 

Forum List

Back
Top