Obama's Syrian Strategy

MACAULAY

Platinum Member
Jun 23, 2013
5,405
3,306
1,055
What is it?

Two years ago, he said "Assad Must Go", but he is still there. Then he laid down the Red Line. It was ignored.

After the first use of chemical weapons, he went cautious. Took him weeks to say he would send arms to the rebels, but the arms never got there.

After the second use of chemical weapons, now he's Napoleon.

We wants to bomb that little dictator...and he was by God going to do it...until the Anglo-Saxons said they wouldn't be around to help.

Now, he has realized he is poking a snake, so he would like for Congress to hold the stick.

That pompous ass Kerry hasn't bothered to tell us why the first policy...arming the rebels... was abandoned without trying. There has been no explanation for why the first use of chemical weapons evoked such a tepid response and the next one turns Obama into Napoleon. What happened to that first policy.

Now, Kerry said there have actually been NINE uses of chemicals on the Syrian populace. Did they tell Obama this? And what did he say/do about the other seven illegal uses?

Obama is going to "degrade Assad's ability to deliver the chemicals". And not actually do anything about the chemicals themselves, or the murderer who is using them.

But, the chemicals can be shot out of mere artillery pieces which are now hidden in every residential neighborhood in the country. How is Obama going to get at them to degrade them?

Now he says that it was the World's Red Line, not his.

"Sometimes only evil choices are available to the wisdom of man".

All leaders know this; and it is time for Obama to learn about it.

The strategy he has now...his Napoleon Strategy...is going to involve great risks of a regional war and accomplish nothing except to vindicate his ego.

He needs to present the American people with a plan for dealing with Syria that doesn't seem like it was drawn up in the Twilight Zone.
 
He is like a teenager.
Overly confident, thinks he is an expert on everything, doesn't listen to those who are far more experienced and blames others when things go wrong.
He is not even close to savvy enough to handle foreign affairs.
 
If we arm the rebels we are arming al quaeda.

..................................................

I understood Kerry to testify that there were moderate factions not intermingled with Al Quaeda. Was he lying?
 

Forum List

Back
Top