SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
What climate scientists publish may be your concern, but I was answering your post 228 where you said:
So what science says regarding climate change is not your concern..and why? Because you know f'ing well that the radiative greenhouse hypothesis discounts conduction entirely and if you acknowledge that, you will being going against your faith.
I am saying radiation does warm the air. I gave you seven points in the process where step 3 acknowledges conduction.
You say all sorts of things...almost none of which are backed up by any sort of evidence...your argument is about as credible as that of a TV evangelist...you say what you believe and you use your belief as evidence to support that belief...circular reasoning of the worst sort... What you claim is irrelevant...can you, or can you not show me a mainstream description of the radiative greenhouse effect which states that conduction is the main mode of energy transfer in the troposphere? We both know the answer is no...because only a top shelf idiot would attempt to support a radiative greenhouse hypothesis with the fact that conduction is the main mode of energy transport in the troposphere.