Ah, so if you decide there is a "conflict of interest" then the government can ignore the 5th and 14th Amendments.
Got it. Thanks for clearing that up.
(for those playing at home Bolling v. Sharpe is the case you want to read here)
Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case which deals with civil rights, specifically, segregation in the District of Columbia's public schools.
Bolling v. Sharpe - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yeah...that sure cleared things up with this thread.![]()
/sigh
Bolling v Sharpe was the case that allowed the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause to be recognized via the 5th Amendment on a Federal level. Which means, if there is a Federal law it must apply equally to all citizens. To do otherwise is unconstitutional.
This applies to this topic, because YOU want the laws to NOT apply equally to relatives of Pelosi. You want them treated differently due solely to her being an elected official. That's unconstitutional.
I can't fix stupid. I give up
![eusa_pray :eusa_pray: :eusa_pray:](/styles/smilies/eusa_pray.gif)