Please help Mortimer its very important

[Picaro]

Mortimer dresses like a Nazi, but I don’t see Nazi rhetoric

He also dresses up like Romans, Cowboys and other fantasies

Yes, a nutjob obsessed with guns, swords, and costume dramas.

 

[Picaro]

France and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You're more full of shit than a Christmas goose.

Enough. You have no posting value.

View attachment 1046767

Projection. You're just too simple to read basic history; don't even have a clue what to look for.

 

[Picaro]

Ah. Haven't a clue, eh, ignorant fuckwit?


Very Texass.


Same with your USA USA USA bullshit.

Yes, we know it pisses off all you commie deviants. Your inferiority complexes shine through like traffic lights.

 

[ESay]

You're too stupid to waste time on. U.S. aid to France goes back to WW I and continues up to today, with our NATO spending on top of that, tard. France has to be 'Speshul', you know. Now their idiot immigration disaster is eating them alive. Good.

BTW, it would be great to see what Europe looked like now had Germany won the WWI. I consider Germany's lose back than to be a greatest disaster for European continent.

 

[rightwinger]

BTW, it would be great to see what Europe looked like now had Germany won the WWI. I consider Germany's lose back than to be a greatest disaster for European continent.

The US won that war

 

[braalian]

BTW, it would be great to see what Europe looked like now had Germany won the WWI. I consider Germany's lose back than to be a greatest disaster for European continent.

Why?

 

[Picaro]

BTW, it would be great to see what Europe looked like now had Germany won the WWI. I consider Germany's lose back than to be a greatest disaster for European continent.

Wilhelm II was an idiot. Germany was doing fine. He highlights exactly why Feudalism had to finally die in Europe, same for the Tsars. Bad timing the way it happened, but that is self-inflicted, like all problems.

I wouldn't disagree that the Slav countries like Ukraine would have been better off under German rule, at least for a while, much better than they did under Soviet thumbs. France, Britain, the Skandies, Finland, Spain, etc. were all better off not being under Wilhelm's thumb.

 

[ESay]

Why?

Germany would have managed to create 'the United States of Europe' over the most part of the continent under their rule, including the Easten parts like Ukraine, part of Belarus, and the Baltics; no WWII insanity; no communist rule over half of Europe; Europe might have been the world's economic powerhouse; the role of such troublemakers as Britain, France and Poland would have been significantly reduced. Etc.

Not necessarily all of that would have come true, but the chances were high, I think.

 

[braalian]

Germany would have managed to create 'the United States of Europe' over the most part of the continent under their rule, including the Easten parts like Ukraine, part of Belarus, and the Baltics; no WWII insanity; no communist rule over half of Europe; Europe might have been the world's economic powerhouse; the role of such troublemakers as Britain, France and Poland would have been significantly reduced. Etc.

Not necessarily all of that would have come true, but the chances were high, I think.

How were Britain and France and Poland troublemakers?

They didn’t start either of the world wars

 

[ESay]

Wilhelm II was an idiot. Germany was doing fine. He highlights exactly why Feudalism had to finally die in Europe, same for the Tsars. Bad timing the way it happened, but that is self-inflicted, like all problems.

I wouldn't disagree that the Slav countries like Ukraine would have been better off under German rule, at least for a while, much better than they did under Soviet thumbs. France, Britain, the Skandies, Finland, Spain, etc. were all better off not being under Wilhelm's thumb.

Self-inflicted, indeed. The worst enemy for Europe had always been Europe itself.

 

[ESay]

How were Britain and France and Poland troublemakers?

They didn’t start either of the world wars

They all want to have some special status in the European affairs. And not only in European. The Pollacks are just small pieces of shit.

 

[ESay]

The US won that war

Nah, they helped Britain and France won this war and went away.

 

[braalian]

Britain and France won WWI

America and Russia won WWII

 

[rightwinger]

Nah, they helped Britain and France won this war and went away.

Britain and France had been fighting for three years and were burnt out. Russia dropped out in 1917

Germany was set to win the war

Fresh US troops turned the tide in WWI

 

[Picaro]

The Russians were crushed. Britain and the U.S. refurbished them and made them the hired help. Britain was able to maintain a global supply chain with a little U.S. help and did indeed fight globally. William Slim in India was probably the best General of the war, bar none. Wasn't a tanker and largely ignored by western media so doesn't get the glory, despite absolutely brilliant administration and logistical mastery and leadership. Fought all over the place.

William Slim, 1st Viscount Slim - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Picaro]

Germany was set to win the war

Nah. their internal supply lines were collapsing, and organization was degrading; even the troops freed up from the Russian front didn't help. France and Britain still had overseas colonials they could feed in.

 

[braalian]

Britain and France had been fighting for three years and were burnt out. Russia dropped out in 1917

Germany was set to win the war

Fresh US troops turned the tide in WWI

Nah

America’s contribution In WWI was too little, too late to be decisive

Once the Germans failed to take Paris in the first months, it was over for them.

Without a quick and decisive victory, France and Britain’s vast colonial empire and resources were always going to win out eventually in a long war

 

[MisterBeale]

The US won that war

While I agree, he is not wrong.

Had Germany won that war, there would never have been a WWII.

 

[Bleipriester]

The war would have been longer, no doubt. Either way France was paid back many times over, and we simplified Napoleon's strategic position re both Britain and Spain considerably. They got a lot more than they paid for, same as we do from Israel.

I doubt the Brits would have lost without France by your side.

 

[Bleipriester]

Nah

America’s contribution In WWI was too little, too late to be decisive

Once the Germans failed to take Paris in the first months, it was over for them.

Without a quick and decisive victory, France and Britain’s vast colonial empire and resources were always going to win out eventually in a long war

I don´t think so.