President Obama: Zero tolerance on terrorist attacks

[rightwinger]

Why is it that Obama is given zero tolerance when a terrorist attack happens? Immediately after yesterday's attack we hear how Obama does not keep us safe, terrorists have no respect for Obama, he allows Muslims to do as they please

After the 9-11 attacks, the whole country rallied around the President. He was given unparalleled support after 3000 were killed in four attacks.

Bush was given a free pass....why is Obama held to a zero tolerance standard?


,

 

[EatMorChikin]

Why is it that Obama is given zero tolerance when a terrorist attack happens? Immediately after yesterday's attack we hear how Obama does not keep us safe, terrorists have no respect for Obama, he allows Muslims to do as they please

After the 9-11 attacks, the whole country rallied around the President. He was given unparalleled support after 3000 were killed in four attacks.

Bush was given a free pass....why is Obama held to a zero tolerance standard?

Maybe because he sticks up for them every chance he can. Maybe because he refuses to call a spade a spade. We know why that is tho don't we?

 

[deltex1]

Because Bush retaliated, whereas Obabble speaks platitudes, garble and lies.

 

[gipper]

Because he likes to call Islamic terrorist attacks workplace violence.

Major Hasan still lives!

 

[Freewill]

Why is it that Obama is given zero tolerance when a terrorist attack happens? Immediately after yesterday's attack we hear how Obama does not keep us safe, terrorists have no respect for Obama, he allows Muslims to do as they please

After the 9-11 attacks, the whole country rallied around the President. He was given unparalleled support after 3000 were killed in four attacks.

Bush was given a free pass....why is Obama held to a zero tolerance standard?

You are once again doing what liberals love to do, set a false paradigm because the truth is just so hard to handle.

Once again we have an act of domestic terrorism and if this were Bush you would be calling for Impeachment.

 

[rightwinger]

Because Bush retaliated, whereas Obabble speaks platitudes, garble and lies.

It was Obama who killed bin Laden to retaliate for 9-11

 

[rightwinger]

Why is it that Obama is given zero tolerance when a terrorist attack happens? Immediately after yesterday's attack we hear how Obama does not keep us safe, terrorists have no respect for Obama, he allows Muslims to do as they please

After the 9-11 attacks, the whole country rallied around the President. He was given unparalleled support after 3000 were killed in four attacks.

Bush was given a free pass....why is Obama held to a zero tolerance standard?

You are once again doing what liberals love to do, set a false paradigm because the truth is just so hard to handle.

Once again we have an act of domestic terrorism and if this were Bush you would be calling for Impeachment.

Bush got a free pass after 9-11

I didn't see calls for impeachment

 

[blackhawk]

Because after 9-11 Bush went to war with the terrorist and confronted radical Islam where Obama is reluctant to do either. If he responds to this attack with something other than his standard talking points I will gladly rally behind him.

 

[Obiwan]

Because Bush retaliated, whereas Obabble speaks platitudes, garble and lies.

It was Obama who killed bin Laden to retaliate for 9-11

Funny, the Seals say they don't remember seeing him there.

 

[Obiwan]

 

[tinydancer]

Oh this is easy why he isn't given a pass. When his whole administration goes hell bent for leather to describe Islamic terrorism as "work place violence" or "protestors getting out of hand over a video" Obama and his idiotic administration needs to be called out over every incident.

 

[rightwinger]

Because after 9-11 Bush went to war with the terrorist and confronted radical Islam where Obama is reluctant to do either. If he responds to this attack with something other than his standard talking points I will gladly rally behind him.

Seems you have it backwards

Bush invaded a non terrorist country and gave up looking for bin laden

Obama took the fight to the terrorists wherever they were hiding and killed bin laden

 

[jon_berzerk]

Why is it that Obama is given zero tolerance when a terrorist attack happens? Immediately after yesterday's attack we hear how Obama does not keep us safe, terrorists have no respect for Obama, he allows Muslims to do as they please

After the 9-11 attacks, the whole country rallied around the President. He was given unparalleled support after 3000 were killed in four attacks.

Bush was given a free pass....why is Obama held to a zero tolerance standard?

the prezbo is certainly behind zero tolerance of certain terrorist attacks

 

[jon_berzerk]

Oh this is easy why he isn't given a pass. When his whole administration goes hell bent for leather to describe Islamic terrorism as "work place violence" or "protestors getting out of hand over a video" Obama and his idiotic administration needs to be called out over every incident.

true according to the prezbo there hasnt been any islamic terrorist attacks here

 

[rightwinger]

Oh this is easy why he isn't given a pass. When his whole administration goes hell bent for leather to describe Islamic terrorism as "work place violence" or "protestors getting out of hand over a video" Obama and his idiotic administration needs to be called out over every incident.

Obama understands the big picture
He can't defeat terrorism with his massive armies
To defeat terrorism he needs the support of the Muslim world. Allowing this to be perceived as a war against Islam will not do that

 

[jon_berzerk]

Because after 9-11 Bush went to war with the terrorist and confronted radical Islam where Obama is reluctant to do either. If he responds to this attack with something other than his standard talking points I will gladly rally behind him.

Seems you have it backwards

Bush invaded a non terrorist country and gave up looking for bin laden

Obama took the fight to the terrorists wherever they were hiding and killed bin laden

and it did not make a bit of difference

 

[rightwinger]

Because after 9-11 Bush went to war with the terrorist and confronted radical Islam where Obama is reluctant to do either. If he responds to this attack with something other than his standard talking points I will gladly rally behind him.

Seems you have it backwards

Bush invaded a non terrorist country and gave up looking for bin laden

Obama took the fight to the terrorists wherever they were hiding and killed bin laden

and it did not make a bit of difference

Of course it has

How is alqaida doing these days? Obama continues to bomb the shit out of ISIS and has prevented further advances WITHOUT an invasion

 

[jon_berzerk]

Because after 9-11 Bush went to war with the terrorist and confronted radical Islam where Obama is reluctant to do either. If he responds to this attack with something other than his standard talking points I will gladly rally behind him.

Seems you have it backwards

Bush invaded a non terrorist country and gave up looking for bin laden

Obama took the fight to the terrorists wherever they were hiding and killed bin laden

and it did not make a bit of difference

Of course it has

How is alqaida doing these days? Obama continues to bomb the shit out of ISIS and has prevented further advances WITHOUT an invasion

it made no difference

isis crippled alqeada

further advances --LOL

 

[rightwinger]

When 200 Marines were killed in Beirut under Reagan, America rallied around the president

When 4 Marines are killed under Obama, the right viciously attacks him for being incompetent

 

[jon_berzerk]

When 200 Marines were killed in Beirut under Reagan, America rallied around the president

When 4 Marines are killed under Obama, the right viciously attacks him for being incompetent

the incompetence of how we treat those in federal offices

started with prezbo g h bush and prezbo w j clinton