President Trump: Making America Normal Again

[Foxfyre]

Pretty much every day I get one or more texts from Newsmax. These are usually notices of breaking news amidst intermittent ads and such. Today they sent an essay by John Browne who is a financial and political analyst for Newsmax along with being a real estate agent in Florida. He is frequently interviewed by other media.

Today's essay illustrated how world leaders from all over are working to curry favor with Donald Trump in the wake of his successful election. . ."Seldom, if ever, has any leader commanded such respect before taking power. . . "

But he goes on to describe four major threats President Trump faces and will face:

(paraphrased summary by me)
--Threat of assassination. No President has ever been in greater danger of such attempts.

--Threat of stroke or other serious health issues. President Trump is a large man and his age coupled with his workaholic lifestyle puts him at higher risk.

--Dealing with inflation and other economic dangers exacerbated by Biden's broken economy may be beyond his ability to completely fix in the four years he will have. Certainly his proposed policies will help but if he is not 100% successful, a partisan leftwing media/professional and amateur pundits will dishonestly report that as abject failure.

--A massive debt cannot be corrected without some pain. In order to address and begin the process of fixing it Trump will need all the good will and honest understanding he can get. A partisan media will not help with that and good will can evaporate if it is successful in blaming Trump.

The text concluded with: ". . .While the threats are real and ominous, he (Donald Trump) has a track record of victory. We pray that it continues."

 

[Cellblock2429]

/----/ The nightmare ends in less than 9,000 minutes.

8968

minutes

 

[Marener]

/----/ The nightmare ends in less than 9,000 minutes.

8968

minutes

It’s going to be 4 years of idiotic whining and trolling.

It’s already started, considering how much we have been talking about Greenland for some stupid reason.

 

[Cellblock2429]

It’s going to be 4 years of idiotic whining and trolling.

It’s already started, considering how much we have been talking about Greenland for some stupid reason.

/----/ Why is talking about Greenland stupid?

 

[Marener]

/----/ Why is talking about Greenland stupid?

Because it’s pointless nonsense.

Greenland is irrelevant and no one is quite sure why Trump is fixated on it.

It’s nothing but a distraction from economic issues the campaign was actually about, which Trump no longer wants to discuss.

 

[Foxfyre]

Because it’s pointless nonsense.

Greenland is irrelevant and no one is quite sure why Trump is fixated on it.

It’s nothing but a distraction from economic issues the campaign was actually about, which Trump no longer wants to discuss.

When the people of a country larger than the State of Alaska, one rich in ores/minerals that should be available to the USA, indicate they would be open to discuss becoming a part of the USA, most people see a good reason to talk about it. When the incoming President is open to discuss that, most people see a good reason to talk about it.

And in incoming administration is talking about economic issues every day.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Because it’s pointless nonsense.

Greenland is irrelevant and no one is quite sure why Trump is fixated on it.

It’s nothing but a distraction from economic issues the campaign was actually about, which Trump no longer wants to discuss.

/—-/ You are a know nothing.

https://thehill.com/opinion/5057818-greenland-security-us-control/

As global competition intensifies and the Arctic emerges as a critical geopolitical battleground, the United States must assert greater control over Greenland to safeguard its national security interests.

President-elect Trump’s vision of American ownership of Greenland is not merely a whimsical notion; it is grounded in the historical and legal framework established by the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement. This agreement empowers the U.S. to significantly influence and potentially control this strategically vital territory, making a compelling case for action that Congress and diplomats cannot ignore.

 

[flack]

Keep in mind that the rainy season will be coming to California in about a month. The disaster is only beginning.

 

[Foxfyre]

Watching the hateful, manipulative, dishonest questioning of Democrats in the Hegseth confirmation hearing this morning makes it very VERY difficult to cut the Democrats any slack as being honorable in any way. It is absolutely disgusting.

But Hegseth is doing a really good job of defending himself and making a good case for his confirmation.

Six more days and people like Pete will be in charge and we can expect the U.S. Defense Dept. and personnel to begin the process of returning to normal. I am really understanding why Trump chose Pete for that position. He is very knowledgeable and very quick on his feet to articulate a good argument.

 

[flack]

 

[Foxfyre]

View attachment 1065511

Unless you are one of the fortunate who was actually educated instead of being indoctrinated. I know I am one who is blessed in that regard.

I do believe the incoming administration wants to return public education to real education instead of indoctrination. And that would be a HUGE help in the process of restoring normalcy in the USA.

 

[Foxfyre]

Newsmax is unashamedly focusing on a special edition of "The Second Shining" documenting the earth shattering event of Donald Trump's victory in November despite the worst a corrupt U.S. government could muster to take him down.

And even as the left/progressives/deep state/woke continue to trash him, he remains focused on the core of his agenda to return America to normal:

--end the border madness
--laser focused on the economy
--a hammer approach to China trade putting America first
--the death of DEI
--Make America profitable again by restoring liberty, choices, options, opportunity, ability to prosper to the people.

 

[Marener]

When the people of a country larger than the State of Alaska, one rich in ores/minerals that should be available to the USA, indicate they would be open to discuss becoming a part of the USA, most people see a good reason to talk about it. When the incoming President is open to discuss that, most people see a good reason to talk about it.

And in incoming administration is talking about economic issues every day.

Greenland is not economically viable. If it were, it wouldn't be home to a small number of chronically depressed people without any significant economic growth. There's no chance it becomes a part of the USA and talking about it is delusional.

The only thing the administration is saying about economic issues is backpedaling from their campaign promises.

 

[Marener]

/—-/ You are a know nothing.

https://thehill.com/opinion/5057818-greenland-security-us-control/

As global competition intensifies and the Arctic emerges as a critical geopolitical battleground, the United States must assert greater control over Greenland to safeguard its national security interests.

President-elect Trump’s vision of American ownership of Greenland is not merely a whimsical notion; it is grounded in the historical and legal framework established by the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement. This agreement empowers the U.S. to significantly influence and potentially control this strategically vital territory, making a compelling case for action that Congress and diplomats cannot ignore.

This is "sane washing". A pathetic attempt from a Trump toadie to make him seem relevant.

There is no military threat from Russia. That much is perfectly clear. The idea we need military bases in the artic circle to watch the Ruskies is insane.

 

[Foxfyre]

Greenland is not economically viable. If it were, it wouldn't be home to a small number of chronically depressed people without any significant economic growth. There's no chance it becomes a part of the USA and talking about it is delusional.

The only thing the administration is saying about economic issues is backpedaling from their campaign promises.

Why? It would give those 'depressed' Greenlanders an option to move if they want and it would prevent their rich natural resources from falling into hands of those who wouldn't give a damn about the Greenlanders but we would prefer they not control those resources.

 

[Marener]

Why? It would give those 'depressed' Greenlanders an option to move if they want and it would prevent their rich natural resources from falling into hands of those who wouldn't give a damn about the Greenlanders but we would prefer they not control those resources.

This is nonsense. Greenland is the suicide capitol in the world, and don't expect me to believe you have any actual concern for these individuals.

Whatever resources they have that are economically viable aren't going to "fall into hands" of anyone without the approval of the people of Greenland.

 

[Foxfyre]

This is nonsense. Greenland is the suicide capitol in the world, and don't expect me to believe you have any actual concern for these individuals.

Whatever resources they have that are economically viable aren't going to "fall into hands" of anyone without the approval of the people of Greenland.

A majority of the people of Greenland have indicated they would be happy to have those resources under the authority of the USA. We are already seeing that an unrestrained China and Russia are not opposed to taking over anything they think they can get away with. China currently for all practical purposes now controls Panama. That is not good.

The population of Greenland is the size of a small U.S. city. They have no army. No defenses. The USA no doubt looks really good to them right now.

The people of Greenland do not have the resources to exploit much of the natural resources of their country. The USA does.

 

[Marener]

A majority of the people of Greenland have indicated they would be happy to have those resources under the authority of the USA. We are already seeing that an unrestrained China and Russia are not opposed to taking over anything they think they can get away with. China currently for all practical purposes now controls Panama. That is not good.

The population of Greenland is the size of a small U.S. city. They have no army. No defenses. The USA no doubt looks really good to them right now.

The people of Greenland do not have the resources to exploit much of the natural resources of their country. The USA does.

They're more than welcome to lease those resources to American companies, but my guess is that no American companies have any interest due to the lack of economic viability.

Greenland is a welfare state. They don't have resources for much of anything and depend on subsidies from Denmark to survive. They should ask Puerto Rico how that's working out.

 

[Billiejeens]

It’s going to be 4 years of idiotic whining and trolling.

It’s already started, considering how much we have been talking about Greenland for some stupid reason.

One day we should talk about purchasing Louisiana and Alaska -


Wait!

 

[Foxfyre]

They're more than welcome to lease those resources to American companies, but my guess is that no American companies have any interest due to the lack of economic viability.

Greenland is a welfare state. They don't have resources for much of anything and depend on subsidies from Denmark to survive. They should ask Puerto Rico how that's working out.

Nevertheless, a majority of Greenlanders are open to joining the USA. Both China and Russia are eyeing Greenland and China is already heavily investing there. It would not be a good thing for Canada or the USA for Greenland to come under the control of either China or Russia. Denmark is far less likely to prevent that than is the USA.

Why does Donald Trump think the US needs Greenland? What to know

Most of the reasons to buy Greenland boil down to two: national security and resources.

www.usatoday.com