prosecution doesnt except the defense in daunte wirght trial

Should she be on the job? Nope. Is she likely to be sued? Of course. If she has immunity, she may not be on the hook for the civil damages, but the victim’s family will be taking home a big old chunk of change.

Still and all, a tragic mistake is still just a tragic mistake.
So if you run a red light and kill someone will it just be written off as a tragic mistake or will the person who ran the light be held accountable?
 
No it doesn't matter the young man is dead because of her actions. If someone runs a red light and kills someone in an accident did they kill the person on purpose? No, but they are still held accountable for that death.
And how are they held accountable?

If one deliberately runs a red light that action is reckless by definition. The driver didn't intend to kill anyone but DID intend to run the red light.

The difference is actual intended action. If she intended to use nondeadly force, how was it reckless or intentional?

One other wrinkle here that you DELIBERATLY ignore.....why did she need to reach for her taser in the first place?

Do we not have an intervening cause brought on by the jackass who made a taser necessary in the first place?
 
No it doesn't matter the young man is dead because of her actions. If someone runs a red light and kills someone in an accident did they kill the person on purpose? No, but they are still held accountable for that death.
But they are not charged with 1st degree murder. I never said she shouldn't be held accountable, but whether it was intentional or not determines how she will be held accountable.
 
And how are they held accountable?

If one deliberately runs a red light that action is reckless by definition. The driver didn't intend to kill anyone but DID intend to run the red light.

The difference is actual intended action. If she intended to use nondeadly force, how was it reckless or intentional?

One other wrinkle here that you DELIBERATLY ignore.....why did she need to reach for her taser in the first place?

Do we not have an intervening cause brought on by the jackass who made a taser necessary in the first place?
Folks break the Law, that is why we have police. If she were a rookie I might give her some leniency, but this is a 26yr veteran who probably trains subordinates.

A tasor weighs about 8 - 10 ounces, a loaded 9mm weighs 2 -3lbs.

Officers are trained to put their gun to the dominant hand side to prevent this from happening, right?

Just these 2 things alone should prevent you from mistaking a taser for a gun.
 
Anyone that would actually pull someone over for having an air freshener hanging from their mirror belongs in prison.
 
Folks break the Law, that is why we have police. If she were a rookie I might give her some leniency, but this is a 26yr veteran who probably trains subordinates.

A tasor weighs about 8 - 10 ounces, a loaded 9mm weighs 2 -3lbs.

Officers are trained to put their gun to the dominant hand side to prevent this from happening, right?

Just these 2 things alone should prevent you from mistaking a taser for a gun.
Folks break the law.

They resist arrest.

They make the job of police VERY FUCKING DANGEROUS.

Then, their family complains when cops make mistakes.

I want YOU to do the job of police. Do it. Go be a cop. Let's see how you perform, you dumb fuck. You better not make a single mistake motherfucker.
 
So if you run a red light and kill someone will it just be written off as a tragic mistake or will the person who ran the light be held accountable?
I would presume that you knew you were driving. You then had a special Dury of caution. Yes, it is still an accident, but that’s where your attempt at an analogy fails. It’s likely still not something you’re grasping. But if you try real hard you might be able to unravel this non mystery by reading carefully.
 
If her lawyer is any good, he will bring up the "hillary" defense.
Too damn stupid to know any better
 
Criminally liable? Not even close. There is no evidence that Potter shot Wright on purpose. Furthermore, Wright escalated the incident by trying to flee. You can't resist arrest and try to flee in your car with cops hanging in it and not expect some blow back. Unfortunately, for Wright that blow back was a mistake by a cop that cost him his life.

Civilly Liable? YES Potter obviously is done as a cop. Wright's family has very legit lawsuit against Potter and the city.
 
Criminally liable? Not even close. There is no evidence that Potter shot Wright on purpose. Furthermore, Wright escalated the incident by trying to flee. You can't resist arrest and try to flee in your car with cops hanging in it and not expect some blow back. Unfortunately, for Wright that blow back was a mistake by a cop that cost him his life.

Civilly Liable? YES Potter obviously is done as a cop. Wright's family has very legit lawsuit against Potter and the city.
That makes sense don't hold Potter responsible, hell the taxpayers will pick up the tab.
 

Forum List

Back
Top