You didn't answer my question. You said that public funds shouldn't be used for anything dealing with religious accommodations or in terms of meeting the spiritual needs of people. I am asking you if you thus disagree with the military employment of chaplains to meet the spiritual needs of our troops.
Homeless people are allowed to use public restrooms, so I'm not sure what your point is? Anyway, the airport has a close working relationship with cab companies, they benefit each other.
all right... lets get specific..
i pay SF taxes... in my opinion it should not be used to accommodate ANY religion for any reason... And considering this is liberal hell... i am surprised they did anything for a religion... but muslims are the newest PC placating thing... so in the same breath...its not surprising.
i would also have zero problem with pulling every religious thing from the military. So you lose in trying to get a double standard.
the cabbies are not airport customers.... neither are the homeless.... neither should be allowed to use the restrooms for bathing.
So, just to be clear, you think that the military should fire all military chaplains then?
lets be clear...
the military is providing something or its employees with our tax dollars.
the airport is providing something for muslims who are NOT airport employees... who want accommodations with our tax dollars. So in my opinion they are on the same level as homeless who want to bathe in private property restrooms.