Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It ain't just a "liberal" argument.And there you have it... a liberal had to throw out the, "well, if you not accepting of homos, YOU MUST BE ONE."
Are you really this below intelligent or are you just a good actor hoping for his big break?What? Is that supposed to be an INSULT? Because you're using in the context of one. You first argue in support of homos, and then you try and demonize those who argue against by calling them one. So which is it? Do you think homos are all fine and dandy, or do you think they're sick ass perverts and calling someone a homo is an insult?
Make up your fucking mind.
Did you once take Baaaaah to mean yes?
Not everyone who rails against homosexuality is a closet gay. You are right. But look for these signs: 1) thrusting their heterosexual credentials in everyone's face at every opportunity, 2) bringing up homosexuality and how disgusting it is in waves, as if fighting an ever returning urgeIt ain't just a "liberal" argument.And there you have it... a liberal had to throw out the, "well, if you not accepting of homos, YOU MUST BE ONE."
Are you really this below intelligent or are you just a good actor hoping for his big break?What? Is that supposed to be an INSULT? Because you're using in the context of one. You first argue in support of homos, and then you try and demonize those who argue against by calling them one. So which is it? Do you think homos are all fine and dandy, or do you think they're sick ass perverts and calling someone a homo is an insult?
Make up your fucking mind.
Seriously.
But I'll be nice.
The "insult" is meant to be for the fact that calling homos "faggots" "queers" (though "queer" has become the "n-word" of the gay community as of late) "fairies," and so forth, and always having a negative attitude toward them...it's like...that's TOO much of a negative attitude. Like you HAVE to be negative all the time to hide something.
I don't think EVERY person who is anti-homosexuality or is even homophobic is gay. But there is always the strong possibility that homophobes (NOT people against homosexuality...there IS a difference) are gay or at least bi.
Those who represent public opinion are not those who are serving in the military. THEY are the ones who should be polled in order to make an informed decision.
Those who represent public opinion are not those who are serving in the military. THEY are the ones who should be polled in order to make an informed decision.
Many in the military often forget that they serve at the discretion of the people and the people's elected representatives. They seem to think that the military should be left alone to make all military policy. Maybe they should move to a military dictatorship - they'd be happier.
What if Iran sent a platoon of lesbians to fight our soldiers? Will the straight ones run off screaming in fear?
The truth of the matter is those GI's do NOT want to be forced into these situations with fags.
But what we have here is the loud and liberal voice of the homos and their lovers/enablers spouting of as if they actually had any fucking credence at all... BUT THEY DON'T.
Gudrid --
incidentally, comparing homosexuality or bisexuality to beastiality is pretty pathetic and a bit scary.
It's all sick and scary activity to me.
If you support homosexuality then why would you discriminate someone who practices bestiality?