Votto
Diamond Member
- Oct 31, 2012
- 56,686
- 57,525
![www.washingtontimes.com](https://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2019/08/28/B1-hanson_c0-110-1800-1160_s1200x700.jpg?c01c701b53e25887fbe0f1dc1bc3054da92889bc)
On Venezuela, Bernie Sanders has a lot more explaining to do
While conservative headlines have seldom failed to lambaste Bernie Sanders for his unforgivable sympathies to Latin American-style socialism, the last several weeks have seen a disappointing shortage of coverage on the subject — at a time it would seem most appropriate.
![www.washingtontimes.com](https://www.washingtontimes.com/static/icons/favicon-32x32.5a141a6b84bd.png)
When Mr. Chavez took power, the people of Venezuela were not outraged or pessimistic; his victory was celebrated by millions. As earth-shattering as his election seemed, the conditions that laid the groundwork for it were gradual and subtle, beginning with the nationalization of the petroleum industry in the 1970s and culminating with Mr. Chavez’s eventual annihilation of the Venezuelan people’s most fundamental liberties from 1999 to 2013.
Now, in the face of such harrowing abuses across Venezuela today, from onerous bread lines to rampant police brutality to astronomical hyperinflation, we cannot afford to let politicians like Mr. Sanders — figures with such duplicitous sympathies to ruthless tyrants like Chavez and Mr. Maduro — infiltrate public policy here in the United State.
And with people like Bernie Sanders as cheerleader for them the entire way. Chavez and company repackaged Marxism as a "Third Way", saying they would do it right this time, unlike the former USSR and North Korea.
When will people wake the hell up?
Anyone?
Once your freedoms are gone, they are gone.
And no, I have no hope for the people of Venezuela in getting the freedoms and wealth back that they once had.
Elections have consequences.