Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Executive Branch does not have to Comply with ANYTHING any COMMITTEE requests of him.
Then why did Trumpybear file any appeal at all when they lost in court this last time? When they lose the final time will he order his SS to confine McGahn so he can't testify?
Only when this actually becomes an Impeachment in The Senate does The President have to comply
So when did you graduate from Trumpybear U @ St. Pete's'?
Again, I graduated Sum Cum Laude at The University of None of Your Business U with a 4.0 GPA.
Why would President Donald Trump and the Executive Branch challenge that appeal?
Because The DemNazi Party is trying to USURP the CO-EQUAL POWERS of The Executive Branch by abusing the COURTS and attempting to set New Precedents so as to Undermine The Power of The Executive Branch and make it Subservient to The Legislative Branch, thereby turning The Presidency in to a seat to be filled by Congressional Puppets with No Power serving only as a Figure Head, and Rubber Stamp for Congress.
So you have to challenge any and all Orewellian Overreaches by Congress when they are out of their lanes, and trying to USURP Executive Branch Authority, Rights and Privileges.
What The DemNazis are doing is called a Soft COUP or Bureaucratic COUP, but then again, they announced that this was their plan 19 minutes after President Trump was sworn in.
The COUP will most likely continue until people start getting prosecuted for participating in it.
Until then we are in a BLOODLESS CIVIL WAR.
lord you just make shit up as you go.The House is the grand jury, they indict, write the articles of impeachment.
The Senators are the jury in the trial in the Senate, on the approved indictments/articles....
The indicting... the charges approved by a house vote, is an impeachment.
The trial held in the Senate chamber, determines the guilty or not guilty of the impeachment charges, and whether to remove him or not.
Also, Bill Clinton was the second gunman on the grassy knoll, and he used a gun provided by Ted Cruz's dad.Republican Impeachment Report: Dems Have No Evidence On President Trump, No Crimes Committed
It's not an Impeachment Either. That happens in The Senate if THE SENATE agrees holding an Impeachment is Worth their time.sure they are.....The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.
Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”
President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.
Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.
“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”
(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...
-----------'
Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!
And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...
The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....
But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....
He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.
Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.
Witness opinions are not admissible evidence in a court of law, moron.
And this is not a criminal trial... it is an impeachment.
It does not become an Impeachment until The House Writes Articles of Impeachment and The Senate votes to hold The Impeachment to dissprove or prove The Articles of Impeachment through Due Process
Too fucking bad....now investigate biden and the adulterer father!!!Zelensky is getting sick and tired of Comrade Trump saying his country is corrupt: Volodymyr Zelensky pushes back on Trump corruption criticism of UkraineUkraine President Zelensky Says (Again) There Was No Quid Pro Quo: Why are we beating a dead horse?????
Once again, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has denied again that President Trump withheld military aid in order to pressure him to investigate the Bidens or Ukrainian election interference. In an interview with TIME magazine, Zelensky made this absolutely clear. "Look, I never talked to the President from the position of a quid pro quo. That’s not my thing," he said. "I don’t want us to look like beggars. But you have to understand. We’re at war. If you’re our strategic partner, then you can’t go blocking anything for us. I think that’s just about fairness. It’s not about a quid pro quo. It just goes without saying."
Zelensky made similar comments to the German magazine Der Spiegel. “I did not speak with U.S. President Trump in those terms: You give me this, I give you that,” he said. (Quote based on Google translation from German to English.)
President Trump reacted to the story on Twitter: "If the Radical Left Democrats were sane, which they are not, it would be case over!"
Breaking News: The President of Ukraine has just again announced that President Trump has done nothing wrong with respect to Ukraine and our interactions or calls. If the Radical Left Democrats were sane, which they are not, it would be case over!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 2, 2019
Let's consider the facts:
THERE IS NOTHING TO IMPEACH TRUMP ON ...EXCEPT WET DREAMS OF THE SUBVERSIVES AND SABOTEURS OF AMERICA!!!!
Zelenksy says there was no quid pro quo.- Ukraine's foreign minister said there was no quid pro quo.
Ambassador Sondland testified that Trump didn't want a quid pro quo.
Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
"The United States of America is a signal, for the world, for everyone. When America says, for instance, that Ukraine is a corrupt country, that is the hardest of signals," he said.
It doesn't matter. Due process will be observed in the Senate trial. That means all of Schiff's testimony goes into the trashcan.sure they are.....The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.
Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”
President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.
Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.
“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”
(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...
-----------'
Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!
And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...
The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....
But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....
He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.
Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.
Witness opinions are not admissible evidence in a court of law, moron.
And this is not a criminal trial... it is an impeachment.
Trump should stop obstructing and put up his first hand witnesses to defend himself, if he has any that could...
I see you got someone to interpret for you the DNC lying points of the day.....pathetic fool!It's not an Impeachment Either. That happens in The Senate if THE SENATE agrees holding an Impeachment is Worth their time.sure they are.....The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.
Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”
President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.
Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.
“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”
(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...
-----------'
Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!
And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...
The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....
But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....
He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.
Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.
Witness opinions are not admissible evidence in a court of law, moron.
And this is not a criminal trial... it is an impeachment.
It does not become an Impeachment until The House Writes Articles of Impeachment and The Senate votes to hold The Impeachment to dissprove or prove The Articles of Impeachment through Due Process
More of that Trumpbear U @ St Pete's coming through.
Yes they are that stupid.
No they aren't, shit for brains. Why should Trump contribute to his own lynching?sure they are.....The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.
Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”
President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.
Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.
“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”
(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...
-----------'
Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!
And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...
The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....
But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....
He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.
Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.
Witness opinions are not admissible evidence in a court of law, moron.
And this is not a criminal trial... it is an impeachment.
Trump should stop obstructing and put up his first hand witnesses to defend himself, if he has any that could...
They are here for one reason:Don't forget they keep repeating the same shit over and over again although it was answered 3 maybe 4 times in this thread!I love abusing these Foreign Posters and Calling them out. You can tell when you have them cornered because like the Effeminate Cowards they are, they deflect, retreat, running like little girls with their tail tucked between their legs and try to change the subject.They always cry when I abuse them. That just makes it more fun.Psst. Not one of these Commie-Socialist-Jihadists are Americans. Once you realize that, it's more fun to abuse them.
To Stifle Debate, Disrupt Threads, Suppress Information and Facts, and Promote Propaganda and Disinformation.
These are Bad People with Evil Agendas and Bad Intentions.
Confession time again I C.
You might have evil intent here but you're just to ignorant to carry out your agenda very well.
You can "Indict" a ham sandwich.The House is the grand jury, they indict, write the articles of impeachment.
The Senators are the jury in the trial in the Senate, on the approved indictments/articles....
The indicting... the charges approved by a house vote, is an impeachment.
The trial held in the Senate chamber, determines the guilty or not guilty of the impeachment charges, and whether to remove him or not.
The witnesses are all relevant and most will be used in the trial, and can be used in the trial, yes Bolton, Perry, Giulliani, Pompeo, Mulveney would all be better witnesses, and that is why Trump is preventing them from testifying.....It doesn't matter. Due process will be observed in the Senate trial. That means all of Schiff's testimony goes into the trashcan.sure they are.....The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.
Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”
President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.
Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.
“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”
(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...
-----------'
Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!
And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...
The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....
But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....
He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.
Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.
Witness opinions are not admissible evidence in a court of law, moron.
And this is not a criminal trial... it is an impeachment.
Trump should stop obstructing and put up his first hand witnesses to defend himself, if he has any that could...
Nothing to investigate, useful idiot. Ukraine has said so.Too fucking bad....now investigate biden and the adulterer father!!!Zelensky is getting sick and tired of Comrade Trump saying his country is corrupt: Volodymyr Zelensky pushes back on Trump corruption criticism of UkraineUkraine President Zelensky Says (Again) There Was No Quid Pro Quo: Why are we beating a dead horse?????
Once again, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has denied again that President Trump withheld military aid in order to pressure him to investigate the Bidens or Ukrainian election interference. In an interview with TIME magazine, Zelensky made this absolutely clear. "Look, I never talked to the President from the position of a quid pro quo. That’s not my thing," he said. "I don’t want us to look like beggars. But you have to understand. We’re at war. If you’re our strategic partner, then you can’t go blocking anything for us. I think that’s just about fairness. It’s not about a quid pro quo. It just goes without saying."
Zelensky made similar comments to the German magazine Der Spiegel. “I did not speak with U.S. President Trump in those terms: You give me this, I give you that,” he said. (Quote based on Google translation from German to English.)
President Trump reacted to the story on Twitter: "If the Radical Left Democrats were sane, which they are not, it would be case over!"
Breaking News: The President of Ukraine has just again announced that President Trump has done nothing wrong with respect to Ukraine and our interactions or calls. If the Radical Left Democrats were sane, which they are not, it would be case over!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 2, 2019
Let's consider the facts:
THERE IS NOTHING TO IMPEACH TRUMP ON ...EXCEPT WET DREAMS OF THE SUBVERSIVES AND SABOTEURS OF AMERICA!!!!
Zelenksy says there was no quid pro quo.- Ukraine's foreign minister said there was no quid pro quo.
Ambassador Sondland testified that Trump didn't want a quid pro quo.
Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
"The United States of America is a signal, for the world, for everyone. When America says, for instance, that Ukraine is a corrupt country, that is the hardest of signals," he said.
I assume, and I presume are NOT RELEVANT IN A TRIAL...FACTS MATTERVNOT YOUR FUCKING FEELINGS!The witnesses are all relevant and most will be used in the trial, and can be used in the trial, yes Bolton, Perry, Giulliani, Pompeo, Mulveney would all be better witnesses, and that is why Trump is preventing them from testifying.....It doesn't matter. Due process will be observed in the Senate trial. That means all of Schiff's testimony goes into the trashcan.sure they are.....The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.
Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”
President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.
Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.
“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”
(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...
-----------'
Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!
And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...
The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....
But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....
He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.
Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.
Witness opinions are not admissible evidence in a court of law, moron.
And this is not a criminal trial... it is an impeachment.
Trump should stop obstructing and put up his first hand witnesses to defend himself, if he has any that could...
What is the President's actual defense, other than mudslinging process and hoping something sticks???
Wrong. None of the people who testified in Schiff's show trial are witnesses to anything. Futheremore, I didn't comment on whether their testimony was "relevant." I said it wasn't admissible.The witnesses are all relevant and most will be used in the trial, and can be used in the trial, yes Bolton, Perry, Giulliani, Pompeo, Mulveney would all be better witnesses, and that is why Trump is preventing them from testifying.....It doesn't matter. Due process will be observed in the Senate trial. That means all of Schiff's testimony goes into the trashcan.sure they are.....The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.
Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”
President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.
Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.
“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”
(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...
-----------'
Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!
And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...
The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....
But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....
He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.
Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.
Witness opinions are not admissible evidence in a court of law, moron.
And this is not a criminal trial... it is an impeachment.
Trump should stop obstructing and put up his first hand witnesses to defend himself, if he has any that could...
What is the President's actual defense, other than mudslinging process and hoping something sticks???
You lie like the scum you are DAMMIT!....Nothing to investigate, useful idiot. Ukraine has said so.Too fucking bad....now investigate biden and the adulterer father!!!Zelensky is getting sick and tired of Comrade Trump saying his country is corrupt: Volodymyr Zelensky pushes back on Trump corruption criticism of UkraineUkraine President Zelensky Says (Again) There Was No Quid Pro Quo: Why are we beating a dead horse?????
Once again, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has denied again that President Trump withheld military aid in order to pressure him to investigate the Bidens or Ukrainian election interference. In an interview with TIME magazine, Zelensky made this absolutely clear. "Look, I never talked to the President from the position of a quid pro quo. That’s not my thing," he said. "I don’t want us to look like beggars. But you have to understand. We’re at war. If you’re our strategic partner, then you can’t go blocking anything for us. I think that’s just about fairness. It’s not about a quid pro quo. It just goes without saying."
Zelensky made similar comments to the German magazine Der Spiegel. “I did not speak with U.S. President Trump in those terms: You give me this, I give you that,” he said. (Quote based on Google translation from German to English.)
President Trump reacted to the story on Twitter: "If the Radical Left Democrats were sane, which they are not, it would be case over!"
Breaking News: The President of Ukraine has just again announced that President Trump has done nothing wrong with respect to Ukraine and our interactions or calls. If the Radical Left Democrats were sane, which they are not, it would be case over!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 2, 2019
Let's consider the facts:
THERE IS NOTHING TO IMPEACH TRUMP ON ...EXCEPT WET DREAMS OF THE SUBVERSIVES AND SABOTEURS OF AMERICA!!!!
Zelenksy says there was no quid pro quo.- Ukraine's foreign minister said there was no quid pro quo.
Ambassador Sondland testified that Trump didn't want a quid pro quo.
Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
"The United States of America is a signal, for the world, for everyone. When America says, for instance, that Ukraine is a corrupt country, that is the hardest of signals," he said.
Former Ukraine prosecutor says Hunter Biden ‘did not violate anything’
“Hunter Biden cannot be responsible for violations of the management of Burisma that took place two years before his arrival,” Lutsenko said.
Ukraine Prosecutor Says No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Bidens
It Doesn’t Take a Genius to Interfere in the U.S. Presidential Election
As the whistleblower’s report notes, even before Trump was repeating Lutsenko’s lines to Zelensky, the prosecutor was already walking them back. And since the release of the whistleblower report, Lutsenko has told multiple major U.S. newspapers that, regardless of what he said earlier, he doesn’t have dirt on Biden of any consequence whatsoever.
What To Know About The Ukrainian Company At The Heart Of Trump's Biden Allegations
On Friday, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, Ukraine's newly appointed chief prosecutor, told reporters his office will review all investigations shelved by his predecessors, including those involving Burisma and Zlochevsky. Those investigations were into activities that took place before Hunter Biden joined the board in 2014.
DAMMIT!
Being Lazy and Stupid are not the character traits you need to challenge me in a debate. You might want to do something about those two deficits next time you try to take me on and I boot stomp your ass in to oblivion.They are here for one reason:Don't forget they keep repeating the same shit over and over again although it was answered 3 maybe 4 times in this thread!I love abusing these Foreign Posters and Calling them out. You can tell when you have them cornered because like the Effeminate Cowards they are, they deflect, retreat, running like little girls with their tail tucked between their legs and try to change the subject.They always cry when I abuse them. That just makes it more fun.Psst. Not one of these Commie-Socialist-Jihadists are Americans. Once you realize that, it's more fun to abuse them.
To Stifle Debate, Disrupt Threads, Suppress Information and Facts, and Promote Propaganda and Disinformation.
These are Bad People with Evil Agendas and Bad Intentions.
Confession time again I C.
You might have evil intent here but you're just to ignorant to carry out your agenda very well.
I assume, and I presume are NOT RELEVANT IN A TRIAL...FACTS MATTERVNOT YOUR FUCKING FEELINGS!The witnesses are all relevant and most will be used in the trial, and can be used in the trial, yes Bolton, Perry, Giulliani, Pompeo, Mulveney would all be better witnesses, and that is why Trump is preventing them from testifying.....It doesn't matter. Due process will be observed in the Senate trial. That means all of Schiff's testimony goes into the trashcan.sure they are.....The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,
And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...
The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....
But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....
He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.
Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.
Witness opinions are not admissible evidence in a court of law, moron.
And this is not a criminal trial... it is an impeachment.
Trump should stop obstructing and put up his first hand witnesses to defend himself, if he has any that could...
What is the President's actual defense, other than mudslinging process and hoping something sticks???
BRIBERYYou lie like the scum you are DAMMIT!....Nothing to investigate, useful idiot. Ukraine has said so.Too fucking bad....now investigate biden and the adulterer father!!!Zelensky is getting sick and tired of Comrade Trump saying his country is corrupt: Volodymyr Zelensky pushes back on Trump corruption criticism of UkraineUkraine President Zelensky Says (Again) There Was No Quid Pro Quo: Why are we beating a dead horse?????
Once again, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has denied again that President Trump withheld military aid in order to pressure him to investigate the Bidens or Ukrainian election interference. In an interview with TIME magazine, Zelensky made this absolutely clear. "Look, I never talked to the President from the position of a quid pro quo. That’s not my thing," he said. "I don’t want us to look like beggars. But you have to understand. We’re at war. If you’re our strategic partner, then you can’t go blocking anything for us. I think that’s just about fairness. It’s not about a quid pro quo. It just goes without saying."
Zelensky made similar comments to the German magazine Der Spiegel. “I did not speak with U.S. President Trump in those terms: You give me this, I give you that,” he said. (Quote based on Google translation from German to English.)
President Trump reacted to the story on Twitter: "If the Radical Left Democrats were sane, which they are not, it would be case over!"
Breaking News: The President of Ukraine has just again announced that President Trump has done nothing wrong with respect to Ukraine and our interactions or calls. If the Radical Left Democrats were sane, which they are not, it would be case over!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 2, 2019
Let's consider the facts:
THERE IS NOTHING TO IMPEACH TRUMP ON ...EXCEPT WET DREAMS OF THE SUBVERSIVES AND SABOTEURS OF AMERICA!!!!
Zelenksy says there was no quid pro quo.- Ukraine's foreign minister said there was no quid pro quo.
Ambassador Sondland testified that Trump didn't want a quid pro quo.
Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
"The United States of America is a signal, for the world, for everyone. When America says, for instance, that Ukraine is a corrupt country, that is the hardest of signals," he said.
Former Ukraine prosecutor says Hunter Biden ‘did not violate anything’
“Hunter Biden cannot be responsible for violations of the management of Burisma that took place two years before his arrival,” Lutsenko said.
Ukraine Prosecutor Says No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Bidens
It Doesn’t Take a Genius to Interfere in the U.S. Presidential Election
As the whistleblower’s report notes, even before Trump was repeating Lutsenko’s lines to Zelensky, the prosecutor was already walking them back. And since the release of the whistleblower report, Lutsenko has told multiple major U.S. newspapers that, regardless of what he said earlier, he doesn’t have dirt on Biden of any consequence whatsoever.
What To Know About The Ukrainian Company At The Heart Of Trump's Biden Allegations
On Friday, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, Ukraine's newly appointed chief prosecutor, told reporters his office will review all investigations shelved by his predecessors, including those involving Burisma and Zlochevsky. Those investigations were into activities that took place before Hunter Biden joined the board in 2014.
DAMMIT!
Oh another fact comes out..
Turns out Adam Schiff hired whistleblower's best buddy right after that famous phone call....Read all about it!
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...buddy_right_after_that_famous_phone_call.html
Lutsenko is the stooge they put in place after they canned the guy Biden wanted removed to prevent Burisma from being investigated.Nothing to investigate, useful idiot. Ukraine has said so.Too fucking bad....now investigate biden and the adulterer father!!!Zelensky is getting sick and tired of Comrade Trump saying his country is corrupt: Volodymyr Zelensky pushes back on Trump corruption criticism of UkraineUkraine President Zelensky Says (Again) There Was No Quid Pro Quo: Why are we beating a dead horse?????
Once again, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has denied again that President Trump withheld military aid in order to pressure him to investigate the Bidens or Ukrainian election interference. In an interview with TIME magazine, Zelensky made this absolutely clear. "Look, I never talked to the President from the position of a quid pro quo. That’s not my thing," he said. "I don’t want us to look like beggars. But you have to understand. We’re at war. If you’re our strategic partner, then you can’t go blocking anything for us. I think that’s just about fairness. It’s not about a quid pro quo. It just goes without saying."
Zelensky made similar comments to the German magazine Der Spiegel. “I did not speak with U.S. President Trump in those terms: You give me this, I give you that,” he said. (Quote based on Google translation from German to English.)
President Trump reacted to the story on Twitter: "If the Radical Left Democrats were sane, which they are not, it would be case over!"
Breaking News: The President of Ukraine has just again announced that President Trump has done nothing wrong with respect to Ukraine and our interactions or calls. If the Radical Left Democrats were sane, which they are not, it would be case over!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 2, 2019
Let's consider the facts:
THERE IS NOTHING TO IMPEACH TRUMP ON ...EXCEPT WET DREAMS OF THE SUBVERSIVES AND SABOTEURS OF AMERICA!!!!
Zelenksy says there was no quid pro quo.- Ukraine's foreign minister said there was no quid pro quo.
Ambassador Sondland testified that Trump didn't want a quid pro quo.
Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
"The United States of America is a signal, for the world, for everyone. When America says, for instance, that Ukraine is a corrupt country, that is the hardest of signals," he said.
Former Ukraine prosecutor says Hunter Biden ‘did not violate anything’
“Hunter Biden cannot be responsible for violations of the management of Burisma that took place two years before his arrival,” Lutsenko said.
Ukraine Prosecutor Says No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Bidens
It Doesn’t Take a Genius to Interfere in the U.S. Presidential Election
As the whistleblower’s report notes, even before Trump was repeating Lutsenko’s lines to Zelensky, the prosecutor was already walking them back. And since the release of the whistleblower report, Lutsenko has told multiple major U.S. newspapers that, regardless of what he said earlier, he doesn’t have dirt on Biden of any consequence whatsoever.
What To Know About The Ukrainian Company At The Heart Of Trump's Biden Allegations
On Friday, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, Ukraine's newly appointed chief prosecutor, told reporters his office will review all investigations shelved by his predecessors, including those involving Burisma and Zlochevsky. Those investigations were into activities that took place before Hunter Biden joined the board in 2014.
DAMMIT!
Funny how times have changedOMG Democrats exonerated Clinton?! Shit I don't know why!OMG republicans exonerated Trump?! Shit I didn’t see that coming! Well, I guess that’s it then. Trump has the utmost integrity and sense of morality. Just ask republicans.Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.
Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”
President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.
Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.
“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”
(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...
-----------'
Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!
He lied in his Paula Jones deposition
He lied to the nation on television
He manipulated his testimony to the grand jury
He was screwing around with an intern in the White House
Then we have all the perversions and passions
Democrats support and try to force society to accept
Well, I guess that's it then
The Democrats don't know a damn thing
when it comes to integrity and moral standards
He lied about a blow job. Big deal.
In the #MeToo era of today the big deal would have been
the POTUS getting head from an intern AND lying about it
I'm pretty sure they will take the cowardly way out, but honestly I want to see The DemNazis SKEWERED in The Senate. They've been asking for it for three straight years and it needs to happen. The Senate has way more power in a proceeding like this and they can even call Obama Bin Lying on the Carpet and roast his Lying Ass in front of America.I suspect Nadler is even intelligent enough NOT to allow a 'Guilty' verdict and vote to Impeach the President, choosing to Censure instead - preventing the Senate from unleashing hell on the Democrats by conducting a trial that will see Vice President Biden, Hunter Biden, D-Adam Schiff, and other high-profile Democratic Party traitors / criminals called to testify under oath before the Senate....and in front of the whole world on TV.The House is the grand jury, they indict, write the articles of impeachment.
The Senators are the jury in the trial in the Senate, on the approved indictments/articles....
The indicting... the charges approved by a house vote, is an impeachment.
The trial held in the Senate chamber, determines the guilty or not guilty of the impeachment charges, and whether to remove him or not.
