martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 82,386
- 33,812
So nothing then.
A man pretending to a woman is not equal to a woman.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So nothing then.
Its not about anyones opinion. Its about the definition. There is already a term for forcefully inserting your fingers inside someone.Again, is forceful penetration of the vagina by fingers a new definition of rape to you? Go ahead and admit that and I'll accept your argument. Otherwise what has changed isn't the definition of rape, but the statute.
Should they have the same rights under your constitution ? Should they have the same rights as you ?A man pretending to a woman is not equal to a woman.
New York changed its law - yes or no?Again, is forceful penetration of the vagina by fingers a new definition of rape to you? Go ahead and admit that and I'll accept your argument. Otherwise what has changed isn't the definition of rape, but the statute.
Yes, that's called rape. Is this new to you? Did you not think that's rape?Its not about anyones opinion. Its about the definition. There is already a term for forcefully inserting your fingers inside someone.
Pedos aren't equal to anything above raw sewage.Arent all men created equal in the US ?
Or will the new reich ditch that nonsense ?
Their law yes, the definition of rape, no.New York changed its law - yes or no?
One law is about giving people further protection. The other is about persecuting vulnerable people. WTF is wrong with you people ?Its not about anyones opinion. Its about the definition. There is already a term for forcefully inserting your fingers inside someone.
.A man pretending to a woman is not equal to a woman.
Why do you mention paedos you sick fuck ?Pedos aren't equal to anything above raw sewage.
It would appear to be a re-definition of rape. It is certainly sexual abuse and intolerable. Rape should be reserved for the more severe case.Jesus you people are stupid. Do you not define forceful penetration of the vagina with fingers as rape? They didn't change the definition of rape you moron, they changed to the statute so it incorporated a broader definition of rape.
The only "protection" pedos need is to have the rest of society protected from them, while thy rot in prison.One law is about giving people further protection. The other is about persecuting vulnerable people. WTF is wrong with you people ?
Do the pink triangle clauses not bother you given the historical precedents ?.
Redefine all the words you want, lying leftist vermin. That's your deal. You and the lying guardian.
.
Forcefully penetrating a woman's vagina with your fingers isn't serious enough for you to warrant a definition of rape? I mean you have a right to your opinion I just find that opinion pretty detestable.It would appear to be a re-definition of rape. It is certainly sexual abuse and intolerable. Rape should be reserved for the more severe case.
So they can change definitions when you agree with it.One law is about giving people further protection. The other is about persecuting vulnerable people. WTF is wrong with you people ?
You mean with their parents ?Why do trannies want to have "story hour" with children in public libraries, instead of in biker bars?
"Equal rights" is not the same term as "same rights".Should they have the same rights under your constitution ? Should they have the same rights as you ?
Its called the trump amendment. Anything he does is ok and should not be questioned.Forcefully penetrating a woman's vagina with your fingers isn't serious enough for you to warrant a definition of rape? I mean you have a right to you opinion I just find that opinion pretty detestable.