Riding Mass Transit Is Like Inviting 30 Wuhan Fluists Into Your Car

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
93,806
65,313
2,605
Right coast, classified
2011 study shows that mass transit users are six times more likely to obtain upper respiratory illness than those who don’t.

Yet another Leftist agenda killing people.

 
2011 study shows that mass transit users are six times more likely to obtain upper respiratory illness than those who don’t.

Yet another Leftist agenda killing people.


Are you an idiot???!!!???!!! Global warming is more dangerous!!! One can wear a haz mat and facial PPE against the coronavirus pandemic. Not with global warming. There is little protection against it but prevention. It will be a slow end of the world!!! Until a large asterioid will crush us to smittereens!!!

Only the liberal rich get to ignore it and continue flying in their private jets and burn fossil fuels in the gargantuan motor vehicles and mega gas and electric homes with 3000 sq. ft. per person. Heck, they get to cut in line to take coronavirus tests and have their underlings get if for them and then they get fired.
 
The hazard of public transportation during these times seems just common sense. I do find the article slanted against congressional action though. Here is its 2nd paragraph.

This suggests public transit should have been one of the first things shut down when we realized the seriousness of the pandemic. Instead, the transit lobby persuaded Congress to give transit agencies $25 billion so they could continue spreading the virus to more people. Transit agencies claim they need to keep running to help “essential workers” commute to their jobs. But if those workers are so essential, wouldn’t it be better for them to use safer transportation?

The $25 billion link took me to a story that is headlined:
U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine L. Chao Announces $25 Billion to Help Nation's Public Transportation Systems Respond to COVID-19

While the main article points irresponsibility towards Congress for this stupid funding, everything else focuses on the administration's decision to use part of the CARES money for this purpose.
 
E42B32F3-59AE-415F-AB4D-FB2E75715A1B.jpeg

Courtesy of the blob
 
The hazard of public transportation during these times seems just common sense. I do find the article slanted against congressional action though. Here is its 2nd paragraph.

This suggests public transit should have been one of the first things shut down when we realized the seriousness of the pandemic. Instead, the transit lobby persuaded Congress to give transit agencies $25 billion so they could continue spreading the virus to more people. Transit agencies claim they need to keep running to help “essential workers” commute to their jobs. But if those workers are so essential, wouldn’t it be better for them to use safer transportation?

The $25 billion link took me to a story that is headlined:
U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine L. Chao Announces $25 Billion to Help Nation's Public Transportation Systems Respond to COVID-19

While the main article points irresponsibility towards Congress for this stupid funding, everything else focuses on the administration's decision to use part of the CARES money for this purpose.
After things began shutting down De Blasio said the subways were safe. And what’s the only State with a major problem.
 

Forum List

Back
Top