Zoom-boing
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2008
- 25,764
- 7,808
POTUS is a racist, Denzel
Yeah. But at least he's "light-skinned" with "no Negro dialect".
Pssst, I heard he was rather clean as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
POTUS is a racist, Denzel
Yeah. But at least he's "light-skinned" with "no Negro dialect".
Crusader,
Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.
Please and thanks.
Sincerely,
Marc
We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.
And? There's a definite element of racism within the United States and there always will be.
And why are you even bothering bringing up racism if the majority are not racists? Why is the small percentage of racists that do exist within the Tea Party always the focus? It's not the point of the Tea Party . . . but you knew that.
Crusader,
Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.
Please and thanks.
Sincerely,
Marc
Crusader,
Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.
Please and thanks.
Sincerely,
Marc
He denied his white half on the census; he just filled in the dot next to 'black'. Does that make him racist . . . or just ashamed of his white side?
I did not say that people other than whites were/are excluded from the Tea Baggers. People of color just aren't interested in de-legitimizing the president as much as those white folks seem to be.There are some facts that are just too hard for Tea Baggers to hide from.We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.
Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.
The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.
So lets just stop for a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.
Hmmmmkay???
Fact: The Tea baggers were unheard of, hell, INVISIBLE during the Bush years. This in spite of their contention that their 'outrage' is focused on run-a-way government spending. No one heard of a Tea Bagger until after the McCain concession speech.
Fact: The demographics of the Tea Bag movement suggest a firm hold on white women with little or no higher education. There is precious little diversity among these folks.
In my opinion the Tea Bag movement uses racism as the fulcrum to rest the lever of the effort to de-legitimize the first Black president. It's transparent.
Please show me any indication that other races (other than white) are not permitted to attend the tea parties.
Your post is infantile and your sentiments are an exam0le of why racism still exists in our country.
You, sir, call out racism strictly for your own personal reasons; to confirm you are right about a group of people that think differently than you.
Those that think like you are a root of the problem.
I did not say that people other than whites were/are excluded from the Tea Baggers. People of color just aren't interested in de-legitimizing the president as much as those white folks seem to be.There are some facts that are just too hard for Tea Baggers to hide from.
Fact: The Tea baggers were unheard of, hell, INVISIBLE during the Bush years. This in spite of their contention that their 'outrage' is focused on run-a-way government spending. No one heard of a Tea Bagger until after the McCain concession speech.
Fact: The demographics of the Tea Bag movement suggest a firm hold on white women with little or no higher education. There is precious little diversity among these folks.
In my opinion the Tea Bag movement uses racism as the fulcrum to rest the lever of the effort to de-legitimize the first Black president. It's transparent.
Please show me any indication that other races (other than white) are not permitted to attend the tea parties.
Your post is infantile and your sentiments are an exam0le of why racism still exists in our country.
You, sir, call out racism strictly for your own personal reasons; to confirm you are right about a group of people that think differently than you.
Those that think like you are a root of the problem.
Exclusion by the group is one form of racism. The actions of that group which are working against the interests of other groups is yet another form of racism.
Your logic is specious. Try again.
Fact: The Tea baggers were unheard of, hell, INVISIBLE during the Bush years. This in spite of their contention that their 'outrage' is focused on run-a-way government spending. No one heard of a Tea Bagger until after the McCain concession speech.
Fact: The demographics of the Tea Bag movement suggest a firm hold on white women with little or no higher education. There is precious little diversity among these folks.
In my opinion the Tea Bag movement uses racism as the fulcrum to rest the lever of the effort to de-legitimize the first Black president. It's transparent.
I did not say that people other than whites were/are excluded from the Tea Baggers. People of color just aren't interested in de-legitimizing the president as much as those white folks seem to be.There are some facts that are just too hard for Tea Baggers to hide from.
Fact: The Tea baggers were unheard of, hell, INVISIBLE during the Bush years. This in spite of their contention that their 'outrage' is focused on run-a-way government spending. No one heard of a Tea Bagger until after the McCain concession speech.
Fact: The demographics of the Tea Bag movement suggest a firm hold on white women with little or no higher education. There is precious little diversity among these folks.
In my opinion the Tea Bag movement uses racism as the fulcrum to rest the lever of the effort to de-legitimize the first Black president. It's transparent.
Please show me any indication that other races (other than white) are not permitted to attend the tea parties.
Your post is infantile and your sentiments are an exam0le of why racism still exists in our country.
You, sir, call out racism strictly for your own personal reasons; to confirm you are right about a group of people that think differently than you.
Those that think like you are a root of the problem.
Exclusion by the group is one form of racism. The actions of that group which are working against the interests of other groups is yet another form of racism.
Your logic is specious. Try again.
Crusader,
Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.
Please and thanks.
Sincerely,
Marc
He denied his white half on the census; he just filled in the dot next to 'black'. Does that make him racist . . . or just ashamed of his white side?
Of course you don't care about my opinion. There's no profit in it.Fact: The Tea baggers were unheard of, hell, INVISIBLE during the Bush years. This in spite of their contention that their 'outrage' is focused on run-a-way government spending. No one heard of a Tea Bagger until after the McCain concession speech.
Fact: The demographics of the Tea Bag movement suggest a firm hold on white women with little or no higher education. There is precious little diversity among these folks.
In my opinion the Tea Bag movement uses racism as the fulcrum to rest the lever of the effort to de-legitimize the first Black president. It's transparent.
Isn't it handy then that we don't care about your opinion?
Fact is... the first thing this administration did was to pass a grab-bag of gimmees to their cronies and supporters, which ends up costing 962 billion before interest. Then they turned around and passed an omnibus spending bill with 9000 earmarks just a couple of weeks after. All this on top of the 700 billion TARP under Bush. It's about SPENDING. And it's about BIG GOVERNMENT.
G.W. left office with a 34% approval rating. And according to polls, only about 20% of Americans self-identify as "liberal". So... don't hand us some rash of crap about how Bush wasn't taking any flak, because he was.
It doesn't even make any kind of rational sense that you expect your guy can come in and commit himself to MORE of all the things we already didn't like about George Bush and nobody'd have any criticism about it.
Be for real yo. In all seriousness and honesty, it was too little too late. All this "flak" you claim he received from the Right was only AFTER it was PROVEN beyond the shadow of a doubt how abysmal his leadership had been and even a donkey could see it as such. THEN we heard tepid reactions claiming Bush had to go. By then it was almost election time.Isn't it handy then that we don't care about your opinion?
Fact is... the first thing this administration did was to pass a grab-bag of gimmees to their cronies and supporters, which ends up costing 962 billion before interest. Then they turned around and passed an omnibus spending bill with 9000 earmarks just a couple of weeks after. All this on top of the 700 billion TARP under Bush. It's about SPENDING. And it's about BIG GOVERNMENT.
G.W. left office with a 34% approval rating. And according to polls, only about 20% of Americans self-identify as "liberal". So... don't hand us some rash of crap about how Bush wasn't taking any flak, because he was.
It doesn't even make any kind of rational sense that you expect your guy can come in and commit himself to MORE of all the things we already didn't like about George Bush and nobody'd have any criticism about it.
Crusader,
Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.
Please and thanks.
Sincerely,
Marc
Crusader,
Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.
Please and thanks.
Sincerely,
Marc
As long as we can use the same rules that are being applied to members of the tea party then I can and by a left leaning group.
The SPLC list the Nation of Islam as a hate group. Farrakhan is the leader of the Nation of Islam. Obama participated in the million man march organized by Farrakhan. Wright is also a BFF of Farrakhan's and Obama was a member of Wrights church for over 20 years. The only difference is people involved in the tea party movement have no idea who the occasional nut job is that shows up with a sign or shouts out in a crow. Obama on the other hand knows exactly what Wright and Farrakhan represent.
Be for real yo. In all seriousness and honesty, it was too little too late. All this "flak" you claim he received from the Right was only AFTER it was PROVEN beyond the shadow of a doubt how abysmal his leadership had been and even a donkey could see it as such. THEN we heard tepid reactions claiming Bush had to go. By then it was almost election time.Isn't it handy then that we don't care about your opinion?
Fact is... the first thing this administration did was to pass a grab-bag of gimmees to their cronies and supporters, which ends up costing 962 billion before interest. Then they turned around and passed an omnibus spending bill with 9000 earmarks just a couple of weeks after. All this on top of the 700 billion TARP under Bush. It's about SPENDING. And it's about BIG GOVERNMENT.
G.W. left office with a 34% approval rating. And according to polls, only about 20% of Americans self-identify as "liberal". So... don't hand us some rash of crap about how Bush wasn't taking any flak, because he was.
It doesn't even make any kind of rational sense that you expect your guy can come in and commit himself to MORE of all the things we already didn't like about George Bush and nobody'd have any criticism about it.
It's like a criminal who had week to turn himself in, but only after the cops hunted him down after a month and put the shackles on him did he claim to "give in." C'mon man, take yourself a bit more seriously.
Darn tootin'...you betcha!Be for real yo. In all seriousness and honesty, it was too little too late. All this "flak" you claim he received from the Right was only AFTER it was PROVEN beyond the shadow of a doubt how abysmal his leadership had been and even a donkey could see it as such. THEN we heard tepid reactions claiming Bush had to go. By then it was almost election time.Isn't it handy then that we don't care about your opinion?
Fact is... the first thing this administration did was to pass a grab-bag of gimmees to their cronies and supporters, which ends up costing 962 billion before interest. Then they turned around and passed an omnibus spending bill with 9000 earmarks just a couple of weeks after. All this on top of the 700 billion TARP under Bush. It's about SPENDING. And it's about BIG GOVERNMENT.
G.W. left office with a 34% approval rating. And according to polls, only about 20% of Americans self-identify as "liberal". So... don't hand us some rash of crap about how Bush wasn't taking any flak, because he was.
It doesn't even make any kind of rational sense that you expect your guy can come in and commit himself to MORE of all the things we already didn't like about George Bush and nobody'd have any criticism about it.
It's like a criminal who had week to turn himself in, but only after the cops hunted him down after a month and put the shackles on him did he claim to "give in." C'mon man, take yourself a bit more seriously.
Be for real yo?
Seriously?
Of course you don't care about my opinion. There's no profit in it.
And if Bush was so despised, where on earth were all the folks rallying against him? Where were the signs showing Bush with a bone in his nose? Where were all the protesters? Where were they when Bush pushed the Medicare drug benefit? Where were they when Bush financed his wars with debt to communist China?
Were they blinded by Bush's milky white complexion?
We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.
Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.
The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.
So lets just stop for a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.
Hmmmmkay???