Sanders investigation: Bernie's wife attempted to evict disabled group home residents, report claims

[shockedcanadian]

I found this particularly interesting, considering her husband ran as a socialist:

Judicial Watch says Mrs. Sanders sent a letter to an attorney representing the HowardCenter group home in January 2011, saying she was having trouble evicting the 16 residents.

“It is simply not fair to expect the College to continue to carry the burden of the expenses associated with housing both you population and ours until February 2012,” she said in the letter Judicial Watch obtained under a public records request.


Sanders investigation: Bernie's wife attempted to evict disabled group home residents, report claims

 

[Pogo]

Her husband ran as a democratic socialist, revisionist-who-isn't-paying-attention.

Now tell the class what his wife ran for.

 

[Dschrute3]

Nice folks, huh?


Sen. Bernie Sanders’s wife has been accused of heartlessly trying to boot disabled group home residents when she was president of a Vermont college and closed on a real estate deal now under FBI scrutiny.

The home with 16 residents was on property Jane O’Meara Sanders purchased for Burlington College in 2010 as part of an expansion project, the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch claimed Thursday.

Reports this week say Sanders is under FBI investigation in connection with her role in securing financing for the project which didn’t pan out and led to the college’s closure...

More:
Sanders investigation: Bernie's wife attempted to evict disabled group home residents, report claims

 

[Pogo]

Dupe thread.

As I asked the other klown --- what office is Jane Sanders running for again?
HUD was it?

 

[Auld Phart]

Dupe thread.

As I asked the other klown --- what office is Jane Sanders running for again?
HUD was it?

She's not running for any office.

which is why the thread is in Current Events, not Politics.

 

[Pogo]

Dupe thread.

As I asked the other klown --- what office is Jane Sanders running for again?
HUD was it?

She's not running for any office.

which is why the thread is in Current Events, not Politics.

It never was a question of what forum it's in, nor did I report any such thing, nor did I even LOOK at what forum it was in.

It's asking the OPs (both of them now) what the relevance of the story is. In any context.
Note their inability to answer.

 

[Auld Phart]

Dupe thread.

As I asked the other klown --- what office is Jane Sanders running for again?
HUD was it?

She's not running for any office.

which is why the thread is in Current Events, not Politics.

It never was a question of what forum it's in, nor did I report any such thing, nor did I even LOOK at what forum it was in.

It's asking the OPs (both of them now) what the relevance of the story is. In any context.
Note their inability to answer.

It's asking the OPs (both of them now) what the relevance of the story is. In any context.

Why does it need ANY context?

 

[westwall]

Her husband ran as a democratic socialist, revisionist-who-isn't-paying-attention.

Now tell the class what his wife ran for.

I think the point he was making is if she married bernie then she probably has similar ideals. Evidently she doesn't. We know he sold out to the corporate world, and it looks like she had as well, just at an earlier date. Do try and keep up, you're looking ever more stupid by the minute.

 

[HenryBHough]

Pity Nutty Old Uncle Bernie didn't make it.

We'd have actual grounds for impeachment in very short order!

 

[Dschrute3]

Dupe thread.

As I asked the other klown --- what office is Jane Sanders running for again?
HUD was it?

She's not running for any office.

which is why the thread is in Current Events, not Politics.

It never was a question of what forum it's in, nor did I report any such thing, nor did I even LOOK at what forum it was in.

It's asking the OPs (both of them now) what the relevance of the story is. In any context.
Note their inability to answer.

Obviously you're just blindly justifying this awful offense. Shame on you and Sanders.

 

[Pogo]

Dupe thread.

As I asked the other klown --- what office is Jane Sanders running for again?
HUD was it?

She's not running for any office.

which is why the thread is in Current Events, not Politics.

It never was a question of what forum it's in, nor did I report any such thing, nor did I even LOOK at what forum it was in.

It's asking the OPs (both of them now) what the relevance of the story is. In any context.
Note their inability to answer.

Obviously you're just blindly justifying this awful offense. Shame on you and Sanders.

I didn't even read about this "awful offense". I asked you a question as to its relevance to anything. One you apparently can't answer. So no --- shame on YOU.

 

[Pogo]

I think the point he was making is if she married bernie then she probably has similar ideals.

Thank you. That's at least an attempt at an answer, even if from a third party, the proposers of said premise being unable to defend it.

But that of course is an Association Fallacy. As already indicated "Jane" and "Bernie" are two different people. The actions of one are not the actions of the other, nor does marriage somehow bring that about like some Vulcan Mind Meld. Nor is Jane Sanders a political candidate. So this is naught but butthurt mudslinging.

--- which is exactly the fallacy I was exposing, so thanks for that. Do try and keep up, you're looking ever more stupid by the minute.

 

[Dschrute3]

Dupe thread.

As I asked the other klown --- what office is Jane Sanders running for again?
HUD was it?

She's not running for any office.

which is why the thread is in Current Events, not Politics.

It never was a question of what forum it's in, nor did I report any such thing, nor did I even LOOK at what forum it was in.

It's asking the OPs (both of them now) what the relevance of the story is. In any context.
Note their inability to answer.

Obviously you're just blindly justifying this awful offense. Shame on you and Sanders.

I didn't even read about this "awful offense". I asked you a question as to its relevance to anything. One you apparently can't answer. So no --- shame on YOU.

Right, that's why i said 'blindly justifying' it.

 

[Pogo]

Dupe thread.

As I asked the other klown --- what office is Jane Sanders running for again?
HUD was it?

She's not running for any office.

which is why the thread is in Current Events, not Politics.

It never was a question of what forum it's in, nor did I report any such thing, nor did I even LOOK at what forum it was in.

It's asking the OPs (both of them now) what the relevance of the story is. In any context.
Note their inability to answer.

Obviously you're just blindly justifying this awful offense. Shame on you and Sanders.

I didn't even read about this "awful offense". I asked you a question as to its relevance to anything. One you apparently can't answer. So no --- shame on YOU.

Right, that's why i said 'blindly justifying' it.

I can't very well "justify" something I haven't even read. And before I invest the time to read it I want to know why I should read it. And nobody could come up with an answer, so -------- I didn't.

Yanno what, it's just like Nosebook. I had several friends suckered into Nosebook who kept nagging me to get suckered in too. I asked 'em, what will this give me that I don't already have? Nobody could answer that either. So I never went into Nosebook.

Sometimes we have to identify what noise is. Nosebook is noise, and so is this fake news.

 

[Dschrute3]

She's not running for any office.

which is why the thread is in Current Events, not Politics.

It never was a question of what forum it's in, nor did I report any such thing, nor did I even LOOK at what forum it was in.

It's asking the OPs (both of them now) what the relevance of the story is. In any context.
Note their inability to answer.

Obviously you're just blindly justifying this awful offense. Shame on you and Sanders.

I didn't even read about this "awful offense". I asked you a question as to its relevance to anything. One you apparently can't answer. So no --- shame on YOU.

Right, that's why i said 'blindly justifying' it.

I can't very well "justify" something I haven't even read. And before I invest the time to read it I want to know why I should read it. And nobody could come up with an answer, so -------- I didn't.

Yanno what, it's just like Nosebook. I had several friends suckered into Nosebook who kept nagging me to get suckered in too. I asked 'em, what will this give me that I don't already have? Nobody could answer that either. So I never went into Nosebook.

Sometimes we have to identify what noise is. Nosebook is noise, and so is this fake news.

Exactly. You didn't know what you were talking about, yet you went into aggressive Defense/Justification-Mode anyway. It is what it is.